[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-19 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-730988517


   Thanks @chia7712 for the review!



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-19 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-730508481


   @chia7712 done



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-19 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-730479015


   @chia7712 I thought only committers can do that.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-19 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-730476432


   @abbccdda I think we're just waiting for your review here. Thanks.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-10 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-724662509


   @chia7712 For this PR I've added a test. It revealed a few places where 
responses had error fields which weren't included in the count. This will 
affect the metrics for those RPCs, since they'll now be counting more error 
codes and potentially observing error code values which weren't observed 
before. I don't think this is a problem, but since it affects Fetch and 
Metadata requests, for example, I think it's worth calling out.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-10 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-724572562


   > Personally, the implementations of `errorCounts` are almost same. Maybe it 
should be implemented
   > by auto-generated protocol so the consistency (code style and behavior) 
can be protected. @hachikuji WDYT?
   
   That's a good idea in theory, but in practice the code generator doesn't 
know which fields are error codes, apart from the convention that they're 
called `ErrorCode` and are an `int16`. If we ever needed to call an error code 
field something else `errorCounts()` would break. I think there is some value 
in having a richer way of expressing types (that is, separately from the 
"serialization type") in the RPC JSON (see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7787 for example), but any effort 
to do that would require a KIP and potentially impose a burden on other client 
implementer who are consuming that JSON.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-09 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-724077206


   @chia7712 is there anything more you needed on this PR?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-11-03 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-720421263


   @chia7712 fixed, thanks.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-10-20 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-712750465


   @dongjinleekr I did a review of all the subclasses.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-10-17 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-711043663


   @abbccdda and chance you could take a look at this? Or maybe @dajac?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] tombentley commented on pull request #9433: KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts()

2020-10-14 Thread GitBox


tombentley commented on pull request #9433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9433#issuecomment-708340163


   @abbccdda please could you take a look since you opened the JIRA? Thanks.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org