Re: [PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub


mjsax commented on PR #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689#issuecomment-2151057059

   Thanks for the PR @florin-akermann. Merged to `trunk` and cherry-picked to 
`3.8` and `3.7` branches.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub


mjsax merged PR #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-05-04 Thread via GitHub


florin-akermann commented on PR #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689#issuecomment-2094077287

   Thanks @AyoubOm & @mjsax 
   
   > I agree with @AyoubOm that both statements you intend to remove are still 
correct? 
   Indeed, yes.
   
   > It seems https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14107 remove it incorrectly 
for inner join instead of left join?
   Removed from left join and added old statement again to inner join.
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-04-29 Thread via GitHub


mjsax commented on PR #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689#issuecomment-2084338816

   Thanks for the PR @florin-akermann. I agree with @AyoubOm that both 
statements you intend to remove are still correct? Seems the stream-stream join 
section did not talk about null-keys and thus left/outer join do not need an 
update? Might be worth to update the stream-stream inner join row, to point out 
that null-key records are dropped?
   
   I also just checked FK-left join, and it still says (this statement is 
missing for inner-join though):
   > Records for which the foreignKeyExtractor produces null are ignored and do 
not trigger a join. If you want to join with null foreign keys, use a suitable 
sentinel value to do so (i.e. "NULL" for a String field, or -1 for an 
auto-incrementing integer field).
   
   It seems https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14107 remove it incorrectly 
for inner join instead of left join?
   
   Might be worth to go over the docs once more to double check (I made a pass, 
but might have missed something).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-04-11 Thread via GitHub


AyoubOm commented on code in PR #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689#discussion_r1561381861


##
docs/streams/developer-guide/dsl-api.html:
##
@@ -1952,11 +1947,6 @@ The join will be 
triggered under the conditions listed below whenever new input is received.  
When it is triggered, the user-supplied ValueJoiner will be called to produce
 join output records.
-
-
-Input records with a 
null value are 
ignored and do not trigger the join.

Review Comment:
   same comment as above



##
docs/streams/developer-guide/dsl-api.html:
##
@@ -1891,11 +1891,6 @@ The join will be 
triggered under the conditions listed below whenever new input is received.  
When it is triggered, the user-supplied ValueJoiner will be called to produce
 join output records.
-
-
-Input records with a 
null value are 
ignored and do not trigger the join.

Review Comment:
   For me, this line is still accurate after the feature KAFKA-12317. If I am 
not mistaken, It's records with null keys (and non null value) which are no 
longer ignored



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[PR] KAFKA-12317: fix documentation [kafka]

2024-04-09 Thread via GitHub


florin-akermann opened a new pull request, #15689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15689

   Fix outdated documentation with regards to KAFKA-12317.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org