Re: [PR] KAFKA-16739: Exclude protected members from aggregated release Javadocs [kafka]
gharris1727 merged PR #15940: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15940 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] KAFKA-16739: Exclude protected members from aggregated release Javadocs [kafka]
gharris1727 commented on PR #15940: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15940#issuecomment-2123422940 Build passes, CI test failures appear unrelated, and this passes for me locally. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] KAFKA-16739: Exclude protected members from aggregated release Javadocs [kafka]
gharris1727 commented on PR #15940: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15940#issuecomment-2108552171 Hi @ijuma @vvcephei @mjsax @mimaison PTAL at this documentation build change, thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] KAFKA-16739: Exclude protected members from aggregated release Javadocs [kafka]
gharris1727 opened a new pull request, #15940: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15940 The `./gradlew javadoc` and `./gradlew aggregatedJavadoc` have separate configurations that should be kept in lockstep. These have diverged twice: #13633 and #1413 and have been converged once before: #10272 . This has the effect of making it so that the aggregatedJavadoc hides protected members, because that's currently the only divergence between these configurations. This was discussed and approved in #13633, but as the change was never reflected in the official documentation, it's possible that users have not yet noticed that protected members have been missing in the last 3 minor releases. ### Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message) - [ ] Verify design and implementation - [ ] Verify test coverage and CI build status - [ ] Verify documentation (including upgrade notes) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
