[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2017-07-27 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sönke Liebau updated KAFKA-5637:

Description: 
We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so that 
people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but more so 
now that we are releasing 1.0.0.

I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones that 
should be documented as a minimum: 

*Code stability*
* Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
* Explanation of what public apis are
* *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
_evolving_ sufficient going forward?

*Support duration*
* How long are versions supported?
* How far are bugfixes backported?
* How far are security fixes backported?
* How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
* How long are older clients supported?
* How long are older brokers supported?

I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation as 
basis for further discussion.

  was:
We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so that 
people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but more so 
now that we are releasing 1.0.0.

More details to come.

Component/s: documentation

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2017-09-22 Thread Guozhang Wang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-5637:
-

*Reminder to the contributor / reviewer of the PR*: please note that the code 
deadline for 1.0.0 is less than 2 weeks away (Oct. 4th). Please re-evaluate 
your JIRA and see if it still makes sense to be merged into 1.0.0 or it could 
be pushed out to 1.1.0, or be closed directly if the JIRA itself is not valid 
any more, or re-assign yourself as contributor / committer if you are no longer 
working on the JIRA.

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2017-10-04 Thread Guozhang Wang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-5637:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2017-10-04 Thread Ismael Juma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ismael Juma updated KAFKA-5637:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2018-10-03 Thread Dong Lin (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dong Lin updated KAFKA-5637:

Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
   2.2.0

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2019-02-17 Thread Matthias J. Sax (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Matthias J. Sax updated KAFKA-5637:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2.0)

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
>Priority: Major
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2018-02-08 Thread Damian Guy (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Damian Guy updated KAFKA-5637:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.0)
   2.0.0

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5637) Document compatibility and release policies

2018-06-06 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rajini Sivaram updated KAFKA-5637:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
   2.1.0

> Document compatibility and release policies
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5637
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentation
>Reporter: Ismael Juma
>Assignee: Sönke Liebau
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> We should document our compatibility and release policies in one place so 
> that people have the correct expectations. This is generally important, but 
> more so now that we are releasing 1.0.0.
> I extracted the following topics from the mailing list thread as the ones 
> that should be documented as a minimum: 
> *Code stability*
> * Explanation of stability annotations and their implications
> * Explanation of what public apis are
> * *Discussion point: * Do we want to keep the _unstable_ annotation or is 
> _evolving_ sufficient going forward?
> *Support duration*
> * How long are versions supported?
> * How far are bugfixes backported?
> * How far are security fixes backported?
> * How long are protocol versions supported by subsequent code versions?
> * How long are older clients supported?
> * How long are older brokers supported?
> I will create an initial pull request to add a section to the documentation 
> as basis for further discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)