Question about calculating the latency
Hello, I wonder what really represents latency in the results of Jmeter (sampler HTTP). I read in previous e-mails that it was the time (in milliseconds) to first response. I understand that it is the difference between the time of receiving the first http response packet and time of sending the request. Is that correct? I compared the value of the Jmeter latency with the information provided by the sniffer Wireshark. I do not get correspondence, the latency Jmeter is far greater than the difference in Wireshark (between the time of receiving the first http response packet and time of sending the request). I know there is the processing time of Jmeter but I think this does not explain everything. For me, the definition of latency is the time of transmission on the network for a request or a response. Is what someone can bring me more details about latency in Jmeter ? Thanks Thierry Boullet www.kereval.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about calculating the latency
JMeter measures the latency from just before sending the request to just after the first response has been received. Thus the time includes all the processing needed to assemble the request as well as assembling the response, which in general will be longer than one byte. Wireshark measures the time when bytes are actually sent/received. The JMeter time should be closer to that which is experienced by a browser or other application client. On 22/11/2007, Thierry Boullet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wonder what really represents latency in the results of Jmeter (sampler HTTP). I read in previous e-mails that it was the time (in milliseconds) to first response. I understand that it is the difference between the time of receiving the first http response packet and time of sending the request. Is that correct? I compared the value of the Jmeter latency with the information provided by the sniffer Wireshark. I do not get correspondence, the latency Jmeter is far greater than the difference in Wireshark (between the time of receiving the first http response packet and time of sending the request). I know there is the processing time of Jmeter but I think this does not explain everything. For me, the definition of latency is the time of transmission on the network for a request or a response. Is what someone can bring me more details about latency in Jmeter ? Thanks Thierry Boullet www.kereval.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UserParameters.setValues blocking
This is a question for the JMeter user list; please post any follow-ups there. On 22/11/2007, Dmitry Kudrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I use UserParameters to calculate, store variables which used on logical controllers. My test plan have a lot of places where these parameters are used. But my threads blocked because UserParameters.setValues method locks with synchronization object 'lock' defined in org.apache.jmeter.modifiers.UserParameters. As I understand UserParameters variables don't shared between threads in the Thread Group. But one thread blocks all threads. I found comment as for 'lock' object which is: * The lock ensures that all the variables are processed together, which is * important for functions such as __CSVRead and _StringFromFile. Yes, this is intentional. Otherwise related variables defined by the User Parameters element might be mixed up. Maybe I am using wrong approach to use UserParameters. Thank you for any advise. Make sure any functions used on the User Parameters screen are quick running. -- Best regards, Dmitry Kudrenko ARDAS group (http://www.ardas.dp.ua) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Proportioning of Request
hi sebb I have written a bean shell script which would return me 0,1,2 from the random generation. but the switch is not working fine. Its not sending request in expected order. I had read the issue in users mailing list. is it a bug so i thought of trying through put controller. i am not still clear how can i proportionate using Throughput controller. can you through some light on this. From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/21/2007 9:09 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Proportioning of Request You could try: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Throughput_Controller You would need one as a parent of each request, and you may not get exactly one of the samples per loop. Otherwise, I would probably use the Switch Controller: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Switch_Controller in conjunction with a function that returns 0,1 or 2 in the appropriate proportions. e.g. generate a random number between 1 and 10 (inclusive) and then divide into suitable portions: 1-5 - 0 6-8 - 1 9-10 - 2 You could use javascript, jexl or beanshell for this. On 21/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have 3 http request. Is it possible to send it in 50:30:20 ratio. Does any controller can do it. Putting it in different Thread group will help in doing it [spliting the user proportion]. But I ll have to rewrite other requests in all thread groups. Can any one through some light on this. Thanks Joseph The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. www.aztecsoft.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. www.aztecsoft.com
Re: Proportioning of Request
On 22/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sebb
This is my function.
I checked the values comming out for the switch it would be 0, 1, 2 . and i
tried placing 3 request in simple controller also and also putting bean shell
function inside __log(). but the order of sending request is not correct
There can be no order of requests since you are using a random function.
${__BeanShell(if(${__Random(0,10,rand)} 6){return 0;}else if(${rand}
9){return 1;}else{return 2;},switchVar)})
That won't work properly, because ${rand} will be replaced by its
value before the script is executed. Either use a Java random function
in BeanShell, or set the value of rand before calling the BeanShell
script.
i am attaching you the logic script. am i missing something
Joseph
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/22/2007 4:50 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Proportioning of Request
On 22/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi sebb
I have written a bean shell script which would return me 0,1,2 from the
random generation. but the switch is not working fine. Its not sending
request in expected order. I had read the issue in users mailing list. is
it a bug
Are you sure that the script is returning the correct values?
Add a Java Request sampler to check it, or enclose the function call in
__log().
e.g. ${__log(${__beanShell(function code)})}
The Switch Controller should look like:
Switch Controller
+ Sampler 0
+ Sampler 1
+ Sampler 2
or you could use Simple Controller parents:
Switch Controller
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 0
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 1
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 2
so i thought of trying through put controller. i am not still clear how can
i proportionate using Throughput controller. can you through some light on
this.
Just use a TC with the appropriate percentage as the parent of each sampler:
TC 1 (50%)
+ sampler 1
TC 2 (30%)
+ sampler 2
etc.
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/21/2007 9:09 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Proportioning of Request
You could try:
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Throughput_Controller
You would need one as a parent of each request, and you may not get
exactly one of the samples per loop.
Otherwise, I would probably use the Switch Controller:
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Switch_Controller
in conjunction with a function that returns 0,1 or 2 in the
appropriate proportions.
e.g. generate a random number between 1 and 10 (inclusive) and then
divide into suitable portions:
1-5 - 0
6-8 - 1
9-10 - 2
You could use javascript, jexl or beanshell for this.
On 21/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 http request. Is it possible to send it in 50:30:20 ratio.
Does any controller can do it. Putting it in different Thread group will
help in doing it [spliting the user proportion]. But I ll have to rewrite
other requests in all thread groups. Can any one through some light on
this.
Thanks
Joseph
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal
privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify
the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your
system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any
purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or
opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should
check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or
indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.
www.aztecsoft.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal
privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and
notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or
disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented
in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
RE: Proportioning of Request
Hi Sebb
This is my function.
I checked the values comming out for the switch it would be 0, 1, 2 . and i
tried placing 3 request in simple controller also and also putting bean shell
function inside __log(). but the order of sending request is not correct
${__BeanShell(if(${__Random(0,10,rand)} 6){return 0;}else if(${rand}
9){return 1;}else{return 2;},switchVar)})
i am attaching you the logic script. am i missing something
Joseph
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/22/2007 4:50 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Proportioning of Request
On 22/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi sebb
I have written a bean shell script which would return me 0,1,2 from the
random generation. but the switch is not working fine. Its not sending
request in expected order. I had read the issue in users mailing list. is it
a bug
Are you sure that the script is returning the correct values?
Add a Java Request sampler to check it, or enclose the function call in __log().
e.g. ${__log(${__beanShell(function code)})}
The Switch Controller should look like:
Switch Controller
+ Sampler 0
+ Sampler 1
+ Sampler 2
or you could use Simple Controller parents:
Switch Controller
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 0
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 1
+ Simple Controller
+ + Sampler 2
so i thought of trying through put controller. i am not still clear how can i
proportionate using Throughput controller. can you through some light on this.
Just use a TC with the appropriate percentage as the parent of each sampler:
TC 1 (50%)
+ sampler 1
TC 2 (30%)
+ sampler 2
etc.
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/21/2007 9:09 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Proportioning of Request
You could try:
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Throughput_Controller
You would need one as a parent of each request, and you may not get
exactly one of the samples per loop.
Otherwise, I would probably use the Switch Controller:
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#Switch_Controller
in conjunction with a function that returns 0,1 or 2 in the
appropriate proportions.
e.g. generate a random number between 1 and 10 (inclusive) and then
divide into suitable portions:
1-5 - 0
6-8 - 1
9-10 - 2
You could use javascript, jexl or beanshell for this.
On 21/11/2007, Joseph Ribin Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 http request. Is it possible to send it in 50:30:20 ratio.
Does any controller can do it. Putting it in different Thread group will
help in doing it [spliting the user proportion]. But I ll have to rewrite
other requests in all thread groups. Can any one through some light on this.
Thanks
Joseph
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal
privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and
notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or
disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented
in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and
any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus
transmitted in this email.
www.aztecsoft.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal privilege. If
you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify
your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its
contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail
are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused,
directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.
www.aztecsoft.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail,
Re: Getting a problem while recording a session via Http proxy Server. Please Help.
On 22/11/2007, Momog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since yesterday morning I am trying to record a session via http proxy server, but Jmeter does not record anything. Please help me. My test is as follows : Test Plan -Thread Group --HTTP Request Defaults [Server Name: localhost, Port: 80, protocol: http] --Recording controller WorkBench -HTTP Proxy Server [pointed to port 8080, Target Controller: Use Recording Controller] --View Result Tree Listener I've set my IE Proxy settings to Address: localhost Port 8080 I've also set my caching to Every visit to page But it do not record anything. Does anybody have any idea what am I missing ? Does the browser display the pages? What happens if you stop the JMeter proxy? Does the browser still work? If so, then the browser is not using the proxy. Check that the target address is not excluded from the proxy. Are you trying to record against a localhost server? I've found problems trying to record localhost URLs with MSIE 7. It seems to ignore the proxy settings, no matter what I do. [I don't have the same problem with FireFox.] Thanks a lot. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-a-problem-while-recording-a-session-via-Http-proxy-Server.-Please-Help.-tf4856612.html#a13897429 Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Getting a problem while recording a session via Http proxy Server. Please Help.
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/jmeter_proxy_step_by_step.pd f I followed it to the letter and got it working. Did you do Tools - Internet options - Connections - Lan Settings - Click on Proxy Server and specify port there? In your test, To WorkBench Add- Non Test Element - HTTP Proxy Server Under Target Controller use TestPlan - ThreadGroup. -Original Message- From: Momog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 7:23 AM To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Getting a problem while recording a session via Http proxy Server. Please Help. Since yesterday morning I am trying to record a session via http proxy server, but Jmeter does not record anything. Please help me. My test is as follows : Test Plan -Thread Group --HTTP Request Defaults [Server Name: localhost, Port: 80, protocol: http] --Recording controller WorkBench -HTTP Proxy Server [pointed to port 8080, Target Controller: Use Recording Controller] --View Result Tree Listener I've set my IE Proxy settings to Address: localhost Port 8080 I've also set my caching to Every visit to page But it do not record anything. Does anybody have any idea what am I missing ? Thanks a lot. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-a-problem-while-recording-a-session-via-Ht tp-proxy-Server.-Please-Help.-tf4856612.html#a13897429 Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 'Spread' for distributed testing
Oops sorry... the attached thread from the spread list did not come through, so here's a link to it: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.spread.user/2818 Thanks again Sebb for all your help! Best regards, Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sonam Chauhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 November 2007 6:45 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: RE: 'Spread' for distributed testing Hi again Sebb... This is an older thread? Anyway, I had a good discussion about this issue on the Spread list (email attached). The approach suggested there was a second process (not JMeter) read the JMeter disk logs and publishing them out the spread daemon in a bandwidth limited manner. This neatly sidesteps the problems incorporate the Spread protocol into JMeter, does not interfere with the length of JMeter test runs, and also will not soak up network bandwidth. Ah - I see. That might help, but it would prolong the end of a test, as the queued entries must be allowed to filter through. There's also the question of where the queued entries are stored. The cool thing is that the entries could be 'published' in a standard format, to whichever application wanted to 'listen' to them -- these could be log-unification tool, syslog, or a test results database where test data could be sliced/diced at will. Can you comment on how JMeter logs are written to disk? Is there buffering involved, or does it write to disk as soon as it can? Kind regards, Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 12 November 2007 7:37 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: 'Spread' for distributed testing On 12/11/2007, Sonam Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sebb: It's mainly a problem because of the data volumes that are required. I don't see how changing the transport mechanism can change that. I thought Spread had bandwidth throttling features so that logs entries could queue up and stream in a bandwidth limited manner to the end destination - however Spread may not have these features. A workaround Ah - I see. That might help, but it would prolong the end of a test, as the queued entries must be allowed to filter through. There's also the question of where the queued entries are stored. would be to setup virtual network interfaces limited to, say, 10 Mbps and have the Spread components bind to those interfaces, but that may be too much work. It may also be a lot of work to incorporate the Spread protocol into JMeter. In any case, I've asked the question on the Spread user list. Thanks. Is it possible to prototype this idea using a BeanShell listener? I think it would be difficult. Listeners are handled specially in client-server mode. Thanks. Kind regards, Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 November 2007 12:57 AM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: 'Spread' for distributed testing In 08/11/2007, Sonam Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought - Would the 'Spread Toolkit' (http://www.spread.org/) be useful in JMeter distributed testing? From the Spread website: Spread functions as a unified message bus for distributed applications, and provides highly tuned application-level multicast, group communication, and point to point support. From what I understand, an existing problem in JMeter distributed testing is collating logs back to the master server, particularly when the logs capture extra information (e.g., the HTTP response). Perhaps using Spread could help in this? It has a Java API encapsulated in one package. It's mainly a problem because of the data volumes that are required. I don't see how changing the transport mechanism can change that. Is it possible to prototype this idea using a BeanShell listener? I think it would be difficult. Listeners are handled specially in client-server mode. Kind regards, Thanks anyway. Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spread Toolkit http://www.spread.org/ Java Interface to the Spread Toolkit http://www.spread.org/docs/javadocs/java.html An interesting article on using Spread to unify apache access logs. http://www.samag.com/documents/s=7789/sam0302a/0302a.htm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
RE: 'Spread' for distributed testing
Hi again Sebb... This is an older thread? Anyway, I had a good discussion about this issue on the Spread list (email attached). The approach suggested there was a second process (not JMeter) read the JMeter disk logs and publishing them out the spread daemon in a bandwidth limited manner. This neatly sidesteps the problems incorporate the Spread protocol into JMeter, does not interfere with the length of JMeter test runs, and also will not soak up network bandwidth. Ah - I see. That might help, but it would prolong the end of a test, as the queued entries must be allowed to filter through. There's also the question of where the queued entries are stored. The cool thing is that the entries could be 'published' in a standard format, to whichever application wanted to 'listen' to them -- these could be log-unification tool, syslog, or a test results database where test data could be sliced/diced at will. Can you comment on how JMeter logs are written to disk? Is there buffering involved, or does it write to disk as soon as it can? Kind regards, Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 12 November 2007 7:37 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: 'Spread' for distributed testing On 12/11/2007, Sonam Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sebb: It's mainly a problem because of the data volumes that are required. I don't see how changing the transport mechanism can change that. I thought Spread had bandwidth throttling features so that logs entries could queue up and stream in a bandwidth limited manner to the end destination - however Spread may not have these features. A workaround Ah - I see. That might help, but it would prolong the end of a test, as the queued entries must be allowed to filter through. There's also the question of where the queued entries are stored. would be to setup virtual network interfaces limited to, say, 10 Mbps and have the Spread components bind to those interfaces, but that may be too much work. It may also be a lot of work to incorporate the Spread protocol into JMeter. In any case, I've asked the question on the Spread user list. Thanks. Is it possible to prototype this idea using a BeanShell listener? I think it would be difficult. Listeners are handled specially in client-server mode. Thanks. Kind regards, Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 November 2007 12:57 AM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: 'Spread' for distributed testing In 08/11/2007, Sonam Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought - Would the 'Spread Toolkit' (http://www.spread.org/) be useful in JMeter distributed testing? From the Spread website: Spread functions as a unified message bus for distributed applications, and provides highly tuned application-level multicast, group communication, and point to point support. From what I understand, an existing problem in JMeter distributed testing is collating logs back to the master server, particularly when the logs capture extra information (e.g., the HTTP response). Perhaps using Spread could help in this? It has a Java API encapsulated in one package. It's mainly a problem because of the data volumes that are required. I don't see how changing the transport mechanism can change that. Is it possible to prototype this idea using a BeanShell listener? I think it would be difficult. Listeners are handled specially in client-server mode. Kind regards, Thanks anyway. Sonam Chauhan -- Corporate Express Australia Ltd. Phone: +61-2-93350725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spread Toolkit http://www.spread.org/ Java Interface to the Spread Toolkit http://www.spread.org/docs/javadocs/java.html An interesting article on using Spread to unify apache access logs. http://www.samag.com/documents/s=7789/sam0302a/0302a.htm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
