Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient
I would say that they are now both equally stable. The underlying HTTPClient code is more versatile, not least because it comes with full source... If there are any bugs in either, please raise a Bugzilla issue, and we'll try to deal with it. S. On 26/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am trying to do some customiations with the HTTP sampler. I would like to use the HTTPClient version as this looks easier to work with for the Body stuff I am trying to send. Is the HTTPClient sampler as stable as the Standard one? I found a issue when trying to use the Authorization Manager with the HTTPClient which does not happen with the Standard one. It could just be something funny with my env... but it just got me thinking I should check which is the better one to customise. Thanx R _ Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient
Hi, I will raise a bug on this one. Looks like the Auth Manager does not append the header for the HTTPClient. Temp work around is just to get the needed Hash and hardcode it into the Header Manager. Cheers R From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" To: "JMeter Users List" Subject: Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:39:40 +0100 I would say that they are now both equally stable. The underlying HTTPClient code is more versatile, not least because it comes with full source... If there are any bugs in either, please raise a Bugzilla issue, and we'll try to deal with it. S. On 26/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am trying to do some customiations with the HTTP sampler. I would like to use the HTTPClient version as this looks easier to work with for the Body stuff I am trying to send. Is the HTTPClient sampler as stable as the Standard one? I found a issue when trying to use the Authorization Manager with the HTTPClient which does not happen with the Standard one. It could just be something funny with my env... but it just got me thinking I should check which is the better one to customise. Thanx R _ Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient
There was a problem with Authorization that was fixed in the current nightly build. Might be worth checking that to see if it works OK. S. On 27/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I will raise a bug on this one. Looks like the Auth Manager does not append the header for the HTTPClient. Temp work around is just to get the needed Hash and hardcode it into the Header Manager. Cheers R >From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" >To: "JMeter Users List" >Subject: Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient >Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:39:40 +0100 > >I would say that they are now both equally stable. > >The underlying HTTPClient code is more versatile, not least because it >comes with full source... > >If there are any bugs in either, please raise a Bugzilla issue, and >we'll try to deal with it. > >S. >On 26/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I am trying to do some customiations with the HTTP sampler. >> >>I would like to use the HTTPClient version as this looks easier to work >>with >>for the Body stuff I am trying to send. >> >>Is the HTTPClient sampler as stable as the Standard one? I found a issue >>when trying to use the Authorization Manager with the HTTPClient which >>does >>not happen with the Standard one. It could just be something funny with my >>env... but it just got me thinking I should check which is the better one >>to >>customise. >> >>Thanx >> >>R >> >>_ >>Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! >>http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb >> >> >>- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient
Hi, I tried it with jakarta-jmeter-2-2.20061004 and it could Auth with normal http sampler but not HTTPClient one. Thanx Reza From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" To: "JMeter Users List" Subject: Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:27:31 +0100 There was a problem with Authorization that was fixed in the current nightly build. Might be worth checking that to see if it works OK. S. On 27/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I will raise a bug on this one. Looks like the Auth Manager does not append the header for the HTTPClient. Temp work around is just to get the needed Hash and hardcode it into the Header Manager. Cheers R >From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" >To: "JMeter Users List" >Subject: Re: Diff between URLConnection and HTTPClient >Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:39:40 +0100 > >I would say that they are now both equally stable. > >The underlying HTTPClient code is more versatile, not least because it >comes with full source... > >If there are any bugs in either, please raise a Bugzilla issue, and >we'll try to deal with it. > >S. >On 26/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I am trying to do some customiations with the HTTP sampler. >> >>I would like to use the HTTPClient version as this looks easier to work >>with >>for the Body stuff I am trying to send. >> >>Is the HTTPClient sampler as stable as the Standard one? I found a issue >>when trying to use the Authorization Manager with the HTTPClient which >>does >>not happen with the Standard one. It could just be something funny with my >>env... but it just got me thinking I should check which is the better one >>to >>customise. >> >>Thanx >> >>R >> >>_ >>Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! >>http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb >> >> >>- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
