Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Eric Martz
Correction:

On 4/6/17 5:58 PM, Eric Martz wrote:
> Windows 10:  Firefox ESR, Pale Moon, Seamonkey, Maxthon (but see 
> caution about data sent to China by Maxthon at above link). I can't 
> test Waterfox because I don't have 64-bit Windows.
The correction is that Firefox ESR in Windows runs both the Jmol_S Java 
applet and JSmol from local files.

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users


Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Eric Martz
Thanks, Henry! I did not know about unchecking "Run in safe mode" 
(hidden unless you hold down the option key). After doing that, I can 
run Jmol_S Java applet from local files (FirstGlance in Jmol) in Safari, 
which is convenient for testing while developing.


We list browsers that still support Java here:
http://proteopedia.org/w/Installing_and_enabling_Java#Browsers_That_Support_Java

Those that will run Jmol_S Java applet from local files are:
OS X: Waterfox, Seamonkey, Safari (fussy to configure, see above).
  Firefox ESR (see above link) maybe -- my system is unreliable for 
testing this for idiosyncratic reasons.


Windows 10:  Pale Moon, Seamonkey, Maxthon (but see caution about data 
sent to China by Maxthon at above link). I can't test Waterfox or 
Firefox ESR because I don't have 64-bit Windows.


All browsers that will run Jmol_S/Java applet from local files will also 
run JSmol from local files, with the exception of Maxthon.


Best regards, Eric


On 4/6/17 9:38 AM, Rzepa, Henry S wrote:

Apologies if my post-tracking is not up to scratch.  I have been silently 
grappling with  Java security policies on my own routine browser  Safari.  This 
browser, including the  “Safari technology preview”, the latest version of 
which was released only yesterday, still support the  browser plugin  API.

Each host does have to be individually enabled, and more than that  it has to 
be set to run in  “safe mode” if Java requires read/write access from local 
user directories. But having done that it is still supported, even in the 
future-looking technology preview version. I have documented it here for our 
own local use:https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=It:jmol



On 29 Mar 2017, at 20:59, Angel Herráez  wrote:

(I'm following another thread started by David Hibbitts but this is a different
topic, so I changed the subject)

David,
May I ask what is the information you have regarding future support of Java
by Waterfox?


On 29 Mar 2017 at 15:14, David Hibbitts wrote:

It's hard to know how much any of us should invest in these java-specific 
issues given the aggressive nature of browsers toward javascript --
but my website really serves my research group, not the general public, and 
there I can certainly get the users to install Waterfox+JAVA.

---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de 
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot


___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users


Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-04-06 Thread Rzepa, Henry S
Apologies if my post-tracking is not up to scratch.  I have been silently 
grappling with  Java security policies on my own routine browser  Safari.  This 
browser, including the  “Safari technology preview”, the latest version of 
which was released only yesterday, still support the  browser plugin  API.

Each host does have to be individually enabled, and more than that  it has to 
be set to run in  “safe mode” if Java requires read/write access from local 
user directories. But having done that it is still supported, even in the 
future-looking technology preview version. I have documented it here for our 
own local use: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=It:jmol


> On 29 Mar 2017, at 20:59, Angel Herráez  wrote:
> 
> (I'm following another thread started by David Hibbitts but this is a 
> different 
> topic, so I changed the subject)
> 
> David,
> May I ask what is the information you have regarding future support of Java 
> by Waterfox?
> 
> 
> On 29 Mar 2017 at 15:14, David Hibbitts wrote:
>> It's hard to know how much any of us should invest in these java-specific 
>> issues given the aggressive nature of browsers toward javascript -- 
>> but my website really serves my research group, not the general public, and 
>> there I can certainly get the users to install Waterfox+JAVA.
> 
> 
> ---
> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca 
> de virus.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users


Re: [Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-03-29 Thread David Hibbitts
I don't have any *insider* information of any kind, but their "About" page
seems pretty clear that they're in favor of allowing users to use Java and
any other plugins if they wish. Also revealing is this page from their
blog:

https://www.waterfoxproject.org/blog/waterfox-52.0-release-download

which indicates that the project may soon fork and only get security
updates from now on (because of a major structural change that Firefox is
introducing). Anyways, on that page they also list NPAPI support as part of
the feature-set of Waterfox, so hopefully that doesn't change any time soon.

It doesn't need to last forever, at some stage the performance differences
between jsmol and jmol will be negligible for all but the largest
structures on modern computers.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Angel Herráez  wrote:

> (I'm following another thread started by David Hibbitts but this is a
> different
> topic, so I changed the subject)
>
> David,
> May I ask what is the information you have regarding future support of Java
> by Waterfox?
>
>
> On 29 Mar 2017 at 15:14, David Hibbitts wrote:
> > It's hard to know how much any of us should invest in these
> java-specific issues given the aggressive nature of browsers toward
> javascript --
> > but my website really serves my research group, not the general public,
> and there I can certainly get the users to install Waterfox+JAVA.
>
>
> ---
> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en
> busca de virus.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users


[Jmol-users] Java support in browsers

2017-03-29 Thread Angel Herráez
(I'm following another thread started by David Hibbitts but this is a different 
topic, so I changed the subject)

David,
May I ask what is the information you have regarding future support of Java 
by Waterfox?


On 29 Mar 2017 at 15:14, David Hibbitts wrote:
> It's hard to know how much any of us should invest in these java-specific 
> issues given the aggressive nature of browsers toward javascript -- 
> but my website really serves my research group, not the general public, and 
> there I can certainly get the users to install Waterfox+JAVA.


---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de 
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users