[jQuery] Re: Tooltips

[kareneliot]

Something like that would be possible with jQuery, but I doubt if it
would be a simple 'plugin' for jQuery, more something you'd have to
build yourself. But it would be quite straightforward to do it.

[jQuery] Re: Problem with IE6/7 show/hide and relative positioned elements below

[kareneliot]

If anyone is interested... and I don't think they are, I have worked
out a workaround: you simply turn it on and off again. Sort of.

At the end of your jQuery custom script, simply show and hide the
affected elements and they kind of reset and everything seems to be in
the correct place.

Therefore, as it only affects IE6/7, i did this...

if (jQuery.browser.msie) {
   $("#contentfeed").hide(1, function () {
  $("#contentfeed").show(1);
   });
}

Hopefully that will be useful to someone.

[jQuery] Re: Problem with IE6/7 show/hide and relative positioned elements below

[kareneliot]

I hate to bump this, but if anyone has any fixes for this, that would
be great...?

[jQuery] Re: Problem with IE6/7 show/hide and relative positioned elements below

[kareneliot]

http://fox-land.co.uk/clients/test/test.png shows the bug in IE6/7
after the elements have been hidden.

[jQuery] Problem with IE6/7 show/hide and relative positioned elements below

[kareneliot]

I have a test page up at:
http://fox-land.co.uk/clients/test/test.html

In IE6/7 the relatively positioned elements do not stay in the overall
flow of the page when the elements above are hidden (the jquery code
uses .hide(1000), but the same happens if you use .hide() ). This must
be a problem others have experienced, but I can't find any obvious fix
for this. Ideally I'd like to find a fix for this that would not
require removing any show/hide effects or the relatively positioned
elements.

Any help here would be very very useful...?

[jQuery] Re: selecting elements in 'load' areas

[kareneliot]

That's great. I had to rejig things around so that the effects that
take place clicking on '.advancedsearchlink a' take place in a
standalone function. Probably a better way of doing things anyway - so
cheers!
Hope that makes sense - and apologies if my initial comments weren't
clear.