[jQuery] Re: jQuery-way for filtering self + all children

2009-05-04 Thread Brandon Aaron
FYI... There is an open enhancement ticket that proposes adding an optional
selector to the .andSelf() method. http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4446
--
Brandon Aaron

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pappy helga...@gmail.com wrote:


 Just curious... what's the jQuery-way of saying Give me all children
 that match a filter and include myself if I happen to match as well.?

 I've been using -

 element.find(*).andSelf().filter([myfilter])

 but that seems kludgy.  Is there a better way? If not, I'll just wrap
 this as findInclusive or find([filter], true) or something.


[jQuery] Re: jQuery-way for filtering self + all children

2009-05-04 Thread Pappy

While it will be nice to pass in a selector to andSelf, it's a shame
you'll have to repeat the selector in both the 'find' and 'addSelf'.
I'd still rather there be only one function necessary.  It's an
awfully common pattern.  Honestly, I wish 'find' had been this way
from the start, and there was a descendants function that works like
'find' today... it seems much more sane to me.

Hmm... other possible interfaces/names -
jObject.search(selector)
jObject.findAll(selector)
jObject.findInclusive(selector) // my favorite
jObject.find(selector, andSelf)

On May 4, 4:47 pm, Brandon Aaron brandon.aa...@gmail.com wrote:
 FYI... There is an open enhancement ticket that proposes adding an optional
 selector to the .andSelf() method.http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4446
 --
 Brandon Aaron

 On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pappy helga...@gmail.com wrote:

  Just curious... what's the jQuery-way of saying Give me all children
  that match a filter and include myself if I happen to match as well.?

  I've been using -

  element.find(*).andSelf().filter([myfilter])

  but that seems kludgy.  Is there a better way? If not, I'll just wrap
  this as findInclusive or find([filter], true) or something.


[jQuery] Re: jQuery-way for filtering self + all children

2009-05-04 Thread Brandon Aaron
Yeah, I see what you mean. What about .findAndSelf(selector)? Trying to
stick with existing naming conventions...
Do you have some sample scenarios to go along with this need? Like actual
HTML, etc. Would you mind filing a new enhancement ticket for this?
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket

--
Brandon Aaron

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Pappy helga...@gmail.com wrote:


 While it will be nice to pass in a selector to andSelf, it's a shame
 you'll have to repeat the selector in both the 'find' and 'addSelf'.
 I'd still rather there be only one function necessary.  It's an
 awfully common pattern.  Honestly, I wish 'find' had been this way
 from the start, and there was a descendants function that works like
 'find' today... it seems much more sane to me.

 Hmm... other possible interfaces/names -
 jObject.search(selector)
 jObject.findAll(selector)
 jObject.findInclusive(selector) // my favorite
 jObject.find(selector, andSelf)

 On May 4, 4:47 pm, Brandon Aaron brandon.aa...@gmail.com wrote:
  FYI... There is an open enhancement ticket that proposes adding an
 optional
  selector to the .andSelf() method.http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4446
  --
  Brandon Aaron
 
  On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pappy helga...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Just curious... what's the jQuery-way of saying Give me all children
   that match a filter and include myself if I happen to match as well.?
 
   I've been using -
 
   element.find(*).andSelf().filter([myfilter])
 
   but that seems kludgy.  Is there a better way? If not, I'll just wrap
   this as findInclusive or find([filter], true) or something.



[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-05 Thread Ricardo Tomasi

From the link you posted you have a library clash going on.
Scriptaculous 1.5.1 conflicts with jQuery, even a basic ID query is
not working correctly. prototype which is also included also seems to
be broken.

On Jan 5, 1:21 pm, Ricardo Tomasi ricardob...@gmail.com wrote:
 For some reason I was sure you were French! hehe :D

 In the HTML you posted, everything is inside the #header div.
 #menu_lateral_usuario and #footer are not children of #container, they
 are way deeper into the DOM
 tree. Since everything is contained by #header, it doesn't need to be
 excluded. The way to achieve what you want you have to also exclude
 all the element's parent's and inner children:

 var conteudo = $('#menu_lateral_usuario, #footer');
 $(#container *).not(conteudo).not(conteudo.parents()).not
 (conteudo.find('*')).empty();

 That seems to work with the HTML on pastebin. the page at
 barquettenet.net is timing out.

 abraço
 - ricardo

 On Jan 5, 3:53 am, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi Ricardo,

  Thats right! I know it works. But not with the dirty code of my job, both
  doesn't work...
  You are from Brazil like me. Don't you?
  See the project 
  at:http://calango.barquettenet.net/~dirceu/cva  //login:dirceu,
  password:senha
  you can click at Adicionar projetos. I injected jQuery at this link. My
  goal is bypass the dirty code, but... arg.

  using firebug, change the second index of array to menu_lateral_usuario.
  It seems like this:
     var a = $('#container')[0];
     var arr = [header,menu_lateral_usuario,footer];
     jQuery.each(a.childNodes,function(k,v){
        if (jQuery.inArray(v.id,arr)  0){
           $(v).empty();
        }
     })
  The above code works (imediatly after login...), but:
  $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
  //JResig code
  and
  $(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty(); //Kean code
  Both these very clean codes doesn't work... I don't know why, but can help
  me in the future.

  You know for my poor english. I really appreciate your help to explain this
  problem. We can chat at gmail if you wish...

  Very special thanks to all!

  Dirceu Barquette

  2009/1/5 Ricardo Tomasi ricardob...@gmail.com

   Both ways do work, as demonstrated here:

  http://jsbin.com/eruje/

   On Jan 4, 5:53 pm, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Thanks a lot!
But it doesn't works... :-(

I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good
   jQuery
code, but is impossible!!!

thanks your attention!

Dirceu Barquette

2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com

 Maybe:
 $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();

 --John

 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
 dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi all!

  Is there better way?

  var elem = $('#container')[0];
  var  arr = [header,content,footer];
  jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
     if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
        $(v).empty();
     }
  })

  thanks

  Dirceu Barquette


[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-05 Thread Ricardo Tomasi

For some reason I was sure you were French! hehe :D

In the HTML you posted, everything is inside the #header div.
#menu_lateral_usuario and #footer are not children of #container, they
are way deeper into the DOM
tree. Since everything is contained by #header, it doesn't need to be
excluded. The way to achieve what you want you have to also exclude
all the element's parent's and inner children:

var conteudo = $('#menu_lateral_usuario, #footer');
$(#container *).not(conteudo).not(conteudo.parents()).not
(conteudo.find('*')).empty();

That seems to work with the HTML on pastebin. the page at
barquettenet.net is timing out.

abraço
- ricardo

On Jan 5, 3:53 am, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi Ricardo,

 Thats right! I know it works. But not with the dirty code of my job, both
 doesn't work...
 You are from Brazil like me. Don't you?
 See the project at:http://calango.barquettenet.net/~dirceu/cva   
 //login:dirceu,
 password:senha
 you can click at Adicionar projetos. I injected jQuery at this link. My
 goal is bypass the dirty code, but... arg.

 using firebug, change the second index of array to menu_lateral_usuario.
 It seems like this:
    var a = $('#container')[0];
    var arr = [header,menu_lateral_usuario,footer];
    jQuery.each(a.childNodes,function(k,v){
       if (jQuery.inArray(v.id,arr)  0){
          $(v).empty();
       }
    })
 The above code works (imediatly after login...), but:
 $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
 //JResig code
 and
 $(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty(); //Kean code
 Both these very clean codes doesn't work... I don't know why, but can help
 me in the future.

 You know for my poor english. I really appreciate your help to explain this
 problem. We can chat at gmail if you wish...

 Very special thanks to all!

 Dirceu Barquette

 2009/1/5 Ricardo Tomasi ricardob...@gmail.com



  Both ways do work, as demonstrated here:

 http://jsbin.com/eruje/

  On Jan 4, 5:53 pm, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Thanks a lot!
   But it doesn't works... :-(

   I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good
  jQuery
   code, but is impossible!!!

   thanks your attention!

   Dirceu Barquette

   2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com

Maybe:
$(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();

--John

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all!

 Is there better way?

 var elem = $('#container')[0];
 var  arr = [header,content,footer];
 jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
    if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
       $(v).empty();
    }
 })

 thanks

 Dirceu Barquette


[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-05 Thread Dirceu Barquette
Hi Brian,

This is a real code. I can't modify it cause not my code:
http://pastebin.com/m2e4cf3ea

Thanks for help!

Dirceu Barquette


[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread John Resig

Maybe:
$(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();

--John



On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all!

 Is there better way?

 var elem = $('#container')[0];
 var  arr = [header,content,footer];
 jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
   $(v).empty();
}
 })

 thanks

 Dirceu Barquette



[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread Kean

This might be shorter.

$(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty();

- Kean

Tested with Sizzle but not jQuery 1.2.6

On Jan 4, 11:08 am, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
 Maybe:
 $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();

 --John

 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette

 dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi all!

  Is there better way?

  var elem = $('#container')[0];
  var  arr = [header,content,footer];
  jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
     if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
        $(v).empty();
     }
  })

  thanks

  Dirceu Barquette


[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread Dirceu Barquette
Thanks a lot!
But it doesn't works... :-(

I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good jQuery
code, but is impossible!!!

thanks your attention!

Dirceu Barquette

2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com


 Maybe:
 $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();



 --John



 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
 dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi all!
 
  Is there better way?
 
  var elem = $('#container')[0];
  var  arr = [header,content,footer];
  jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
 if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
$(v).empty();
 }
  })
 
  thanks
 
  Dirceu Barquette
 



[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread Dirceu Barquette
Not works too...

Thank you.

Dirceu Barquette

2009/1/4 Kean shenan...@gmail.com


 This might be shorter.

 $(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty();

 - Kean

 Tested with Sizzle but not jQuery 1.2.6

 On Jan 4, 11:08 am, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
  Maybe:
  $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
 
  --John
 
  On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
 
  dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi all!
 
   Is there better way?
 
   var elem = $('#container')[0];
   var  arr = [header,content,footer];
   jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
  if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
 $(v).empty();
  }
   })
 
   thanks
 
   Dirceu Barquette



[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread Ricardo Tomasi

Both ways do work, as demonstrated here:

http://jsbin.com/eruje/

On Jan 4, 5:53 pm, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Thanks a lot!
 But it doesn't works... :-(

 I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good jQuery
 code, but is impossible!!!

 thanks your attention!

 Dirceu Barquette

 2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com



  Maybe:
  $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();

  --John

  On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
  dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi all!

   Is there better way?

   var elem = $('#container')[0];
   var  arr = [header,content,footer];
   jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
      if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
         $(v).empty();
      }
   })

   thanks

   Dirceu Barquette


[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread Dirceu Barquette
Hi Ricardo,

Thats right! I know it works. But not with the dirty code of my job, both
doesn't work...
You are from Brazil like me. Don't you?
See the project at:
http://calango.barquettenet.net/~dirceu/cva//login:dirceu,
password:senha
you can click at Adicionar projetos. I injected jQuery at this link. My
goal is bypass the dirty code, but... arg.

using firebug, change the second index of array to menu_lateral_usuario.
It seems like this:
   var a = $('#container')[0];
   var arr = [header,menu_lateral_usuario,footer];
   jQuery.each(a.childNodes,function(k,v){
  if (jQuery.inArray(v.id,arr)  0){
 $(v).empty();
  }
   })
The above code works (imediatly after login...), but:
$(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
//JResig code
and
$(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty(); //Kean code
Both these very clean codes doesn't work... I don't know why, but can help
me in the future.

You know for my poor english. I really appreciate your help to explain this
problem. We can chat at gmail if you wish...

Very special thanks to all!

Dirceu Barquette

2009/1/5 Ricardo Tomasi ricardob...@gmail.com


 Both ways do work, as demonstrated here:

 http://jsbin.com/eruje/

 On Jan 4, 5:53 pm, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Thanks a lot!
  But it doesn't works... :-(
 
  I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good
 jQuery
  code, but is impossible!!!
 
  thanks your attention!
 
  Dirceu Barquette
 
  2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com
 
 
 
   Maybe:
   $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
 
   --John
 
   On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
   dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
 
Is there better way?
 
var elem = $('#container')[0];
var  arr = [header,content,footer];
jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
   if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
  $(v).empty();
   }
})
 
thanks
 
Dirceu Barquette



[jQuery] Re: jQuery way

2009-01-04 Thread brian

What does #container look like? Can you post an example of just that
element with its HTML?

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Dirceu Barquette
dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Ricardo,

 Thats right! I know it works. But not with the dirty code of my job, both
 doesn't work...
 You are from Brazil like me. Don't you?
 See the project at:
 http://calango.barquettenet.net/~dirceu/cva//login:dirceu,
 password:senha
 you can click at Adicionar projetos. I injected jQuery at this link. My
 goal is bypass the dirty code, but... arg.

 using firebug, change the second index of array to menu_lateral_usuario.
 It seems like this:
var a = $('#container')[0];
var arr = [header,menu_lateral_usuario,footer];
jQuery.each(a.childNodes,function(k,v){
   if (jQuery.inArray(v.id,arr)  0){
  $(v).empty();
   }
})
 The above code works (imediatly after login...), but:
 $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
 //JResig code
 and
 $(#container  :not(#header, #content, #footer)).empty(); //Kean code
 Both these very clean codes doesn't work... I don't know why, but can help
 me in the future.

 You know for my poor english. I really appreciate your help to explain this
 problem. We can chat at gmail if you wish...

 Very special thanks to all!

 Dirceu Barquette

 2009/1/5 Ricardo Tomasi ricardob...@gmail.com

 Both ways do work, as demonstrated here:

 http://jsbin.com/eruje/

 On Jan 4, 5:53 pm, Dirceu Barquette dirceu.barque...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Thanks a lot!
  But it doesn't works... :-(
 
  I get a really dirty code to add modules. I wish inject a pretty good
  jQuery
  code, but is impossible!!!
 
  thanks your attention!
 
  Dirceu Barquette
 
  2009/1/4 John Resig jere...@gmail.com
 
 
 
   Maybe:
   $(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
 
   --John
 
   On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
   dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
 
Is there better way?
 
var elem = $('#container')[0];
var  arr = [header,content,footer];
jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(k,v) {
   if (jQuery.inArray(v.id, arr)  0) {
  $(v).empty();
   }
})
 
thanks
 
Dirceu Barquette



[jQuery] Re: jquery way to set page title?

2007-06-01 Thread Matt Stith

No need for jquery here, using normal javascript would be much faster.

document.title = blahblahblah;

(i think :-\ )

On 6/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi,

Subject line is the question.  How do I use JQuery to set the page
title (what goes in the TITLE tags)?

Thanks, - Dave




[jQuery] Re: jquery way to set page title?

2007-06-01 Thread Glen Lipka

Interestingly $(title).text('new'); changes the title in the DOM, you can
see it in firebug, but it doesn't change it in the window.

Glen


On 6/1/07, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



jQuery is not needed for this, try:

document.title = ...;

~Sean