[Review Queue] storage (encryption) and nfs (trusty)

2014-11-05 Thread Cory Johns
I reviewed Chris's addition to the storage charm to add encrypted
file-system support.  He added tests per Tim's request, which were
good, but I had issues running them as we as encountering a few small
test breakages in the existing tests.

I also reviewed Matt's test additions to get the nfs charm promoted to
trusty, but I also ran into a test failure there, as well.

[1]: 
https://launchpad.net/~chris-gondolin/charms/trusty/storage/trunk/+merge/234452
[2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1387460

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


[Review Queue] storage

2014-09-26 Thread David Britton

https://code.launchpad.net/~tribaal/charms/precise/storage/refactor-mount-volume/+merge/232236

Needs Fixing:  Failing some deployments scenerios, but the idea and
refactor seem sound at this point.  Spoke with Chris in the review and
on IRC.


-- 
David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


[Review Queue] storage and zabbix-agent (personal namespace) followup

2014-09-26 Thread Cory Johns
https://code.launchpad.net/~tribaal/charms/precise/storage/refactor-mount-volume/+merge/232236

I had some back-and-forth discussion with Chris and David regarding
this refactor, which looks like a great change to me.  I have
personally reserved my +1 due to some tests that were necessarily
removed from the `make test` target due to this change, but Chris
makes a good point that reintegrating them will further complicate an
already complex review, and it appears that he and David have
discussed it at length.  So my review was more of a +0 than a -1
(pending an issue with testing this with the postgres charm that David
uncovered).

https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1369892

I did a follow-up on my previous review for Samuel.  I felt like there
was still some lack of clarity regarding how personal namespaces work,
so I tried to explain it further, with links, as well as responding to
Samuel's direct points.  This highlights the need to better describe
in the documentation the distinction between Recommended charms and
personal namespace charms, as well as precisely when a review is
required vs when one can be optionally requested simply for feedback
or advice.

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


Re: [Review Queue] storage and zabbix-agent (personal namespace) followup

2014-09-26 Thread David Britton
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:46:44PM +0300, Christopher Glass wrote:
 
 Back to the hammer and anvil for this one!

Looking forward to seeing it again.  Thanks Chris for your willingness
to take this one on! :)


-- 
David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju