Re: dependency branches for 1.21
In general, let's please move toward using gopkg.in to maintain stable APIs. Then we should be able to use the latest version of all dependencies without thinking too much, and there will always be a branch available for backported changes. On 5 February 2015 at 20:38, Horacio Duran wrote: > Hey, I have been backporting licencing fixes into utils, syslog and testing > for 1.21 release. While doing this I noticed that the revs testing and utils > used in 1.21 are quite far from what we use in master so, in order to > prevent bringing unwanted changes to 1.21 by bumping the deps to HEAD I > branched utils and testing at the version they where in 1.21. > Both repos now have a 1.21 branch where all backported changes should go, if > any. > I presume I will be doing the same for 1.22 If I find the case to be the > same. > Cheers. > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Re: Unit test failure in juju/errors
On 6 February 2015 at 09:14, Matthew Williams wrote: > Hi Folks, > > It appears that juju/errors has a failing unit test: > http://paste.ubuntu.com/10085832/ > > It also appears that it only fails in go1.4 Interesting. It seems that the line reported for a defer has changed in 1.4. That said, I'm not really sure why that test needs to use defer. The functionality being tested doesn't rely on defer at all. -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Re: Unit test failure in juju/errors
Interesting. It seems that the line reported for a defer has changed in 1.4. That said, I'm not really sure why that test needs to use defer. The functionality being tested doesn't rely on defer at all. On 6 February 2015 at 09:14, Matthew Williams wrote: > Hi Folks, > > It appears that juju/errors has a failing unit test: > http://paste.ubuntu.com/10085832/ > > It also appears that it only fails in go1.4 > > Matty > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Unit test failure in juju/errors
Hi Folks, It appears that juju/errors has a failing unit test: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10085832/ It also appears that it only fails in go1.4 Matty -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
