Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
More INFO: -- julia versioninfo(true) Julia Version 0.4.0-dev+1876 Commit a0542e7 (2014-11-30 02:13 UTC) Platform Info: System: Linux (arm-linux-gnueabihf) CPU: ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) WORD_SIZE: 32 Linaro 14.04 uname: Linux 3.0.36+ #14 SMP PREEMPT Tue Aug 26 13:51:06 CST 2014 armv7l armv7l Memory: 2.0 GB (1366.35546875 MB free) Uptime: 2827.0 sec Load Avg: 2.22607421875 0.77392578125 0.41015625 ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l): speed user nice sys idle irq #1 1008 MHz 2372 s 0 s 30710 s 243273 s 51 s #2 1008 MHz 2236 s 0 s 3846 s 273905 s 0 s #3 1008 MHz 1864 s 0 s 4416 s 271809 s 0 s #4 1008 MHz 3116 s 0 s 2180 s 275603 s 0 s BLAS: libopenblas (NO_AFFINITY ARMV7) LAPACK: libopenblas LIBM: libm LLVM: libLLVM-3.5.0 Environment: TERM = xterm PATH = /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games HOME = /root Package Directory: /root/.julia/v0.4 INFO: Initializing package repository /root/.julia/v0.4 INFO: Cloning METADATA from git://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl No packages installed julia -- root@radxa:~/julia# cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) processor : 0 BogoMIPS: 3214.95 processor : 1 BogoMIPS: 3214.95 processor : 2 BogoMIPS: 3214.95 processor : 3 BogoMIPS: 3214.95 Features: swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x3 CPU part: 0xc09 CPU revision: 0 Hardware: RK30board Revision: Serial : On Sunday, November 30, 2014 12:36:34 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Finished compiling, Lots of warnings, %CPU at 299~310, Used your below test and mine is the same. How can we find what is spinning all the CPU cycles? https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ZtUw4ml2dXc/VHrI7joXJhI/AFs/VGb5yUeYq-8/s1600/htop.JPG On Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:17:33 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing for me before works fine now. julia Base.LinAlg.BlasInt Int32 julia Base.USE_BLAS64 false -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org wrote: Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole openblas directory before starting the build. -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton isaiah...@gmail.com wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
Thanks, I'll try again On Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:44:18 PM UTC-7, Isaiah wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole openblas directory before starting the build. -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton isaiah.nor...@gmail.com wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing for me before works fine now. julia Base.LinAlg.BlasInt Int32 julia Base.USE_BLAS64 false -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org wrote: Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole openblas directory before starting the build. -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton isaiah.nor...@gmail.com wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
Yes, the ARM nomenclature is a huge alphabet soup. This could be handy, I suppose: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ARM_microarchitectures -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 1:38 am, Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: Another Correction: The RK3188 features a quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 - The RK3288 is based on the Quad Core Cortex-A17 The Radxa Rock Pro is a RK3188 Cortex-A9 It's like ARM has a dice shaker with letters and number and each letter and number has it's own dice shaker, add to the the convoluted information on the internet your head explodes. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:02:11 PM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Correction: Quad-Core Cortex-A17 is an ARMv7 based product RK3188 - I have no idea where I got ARM9 from On Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:31:28 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
Finished compiling, Lots of warnings, %CPU at 299~310, Used your below test and mine is the same. How can we find what is spinning all the CPU cycles? https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ZtUw4ml2dXc/VHrI7joXJhI/AFs/VGb5yUeYq-8/s1600/htop.JPG On Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:17:33 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing for me before works fine now. julia Base.LinAlg.BlasInt Int32 julia Base.USE_BLAS64 false -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org javascript: wrote: Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole openblas directory before starting the build. -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton isaiah...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
Re: [julia-users] Julia on ARM Radxa Rock Pro Quad Core
`killall -USR1 julia` On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 2:36:37 AM Airhead Bit airhead...@gmail.com wrote: Finished compiling, Lots of warnings, %CPU at 299~310, Used your below test and mine is the same. How can we find what is spinning all the CPU cycles? https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ZtUw4ml2dXc/VHrI7joXJhI/AFs/VGb5yUeYq-8/s1600/htop.JPG On Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:17:33 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing for me before works fine now. julia Base.LinAlg.BlasInt Int32 julia Base.USE_BLAS64 false -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org wrote: Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole openblas directory before starting the build. -viral On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton isaiah...@gmail.com wrote: You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: git pull verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 Same error message : ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) Unit still compiling. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? -viral On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit airhe...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: Just finished compiling one Error: Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: ErrorException(BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.) exports.jl Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... root@radxa:~/julia# make testall JULIA test/all Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Worker 5 terminated. Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% until I killed the terminal I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the Make.user file. Any other ideas for a build? Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU?
