[julia-users] Re: [ANN] Measurements.jl v0.1.1: Error propagation library

2016-06-27 Thread Mosè Giordano 
Hi,

2016-06-27 4:32 GMT+02:00 g:
>
> Hello,
> This looks very nice. I will use it next time I have a need. 
>

Thank you :-)
 

> I took a brief look at the code, and I have one question. Why did you 
> choose to "tag" your Measurement types with a random Float64, instead of an 
> incrementing integer?
>

How would you do it?  With a global variable?  I didn't benchmark it, but 
I'm worried about performances.  In addition, this causes a race condition 
when parallelization is enabled, doesn't it?

Bye,
Mosè

[julia-users] Re: [ANN] Measurements.jl v0.1.1: Error propagation library

2016-06-26 Thread ggggg 
Hello,
This looks very nice. I will use it next time I have a need. 

I took a brief look at the code, and I have one question. Why did you 
choose to "tag" your Measurement types with a random Float64, instead of an 
incrementing integer?

>
>