[julia-users] Re: Versioning for unregistered Packages

2015-11-30 Thread Tony Kelman
Contributions adding to the documentation based on what you were able to 
get to work would be much appreciated, I'm sure.


On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 11:29:21 PM UTC-8, Leonardo wrote:
>
> Issue closed.
>
> I've omitted to register "offline" package (git repo is on local disk) 
> with command:
> Pkg.register("", "git://.git")
>
> Thanks for all suggestions
>
> Leonardo
>
>
> Il giorno lunedì 23 novembre 2015 09:06:47 UTC+1, Leonardo ha scritto:
>>
>> Moreover, digging into Pkg code, I've found that version is returned by 
>> Pkg.Read.installed_version(), which requires firstly a call to 
>> Pkg.Read.available(pkgname::AbstractString), but calling this last 
>> method from REPL I get an empty Dict also for "normal" packages.
>> Maybe because Base (and all sub-packages) is precompiled?
>>
>> Leonardo
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 20:06:45 UTC+1, Leonardo ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Yes, but with no results (I've forgotten to indicate it in previous 
>>> message)
>>>
>>> I've tagged with Pkg.tag() after package was commited and tagged with 
>>> git: state of source is in correct state to do this?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Leonardo
>>>
>>>
>>> Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 10:41:27 UTC+1, Kristoffer Carlsson 
>>> ha scritto:

 Did you tag with Pkg.tag("...")?
>>>
>>>

[julia-users] Re: Versioning for unregistered Packages

2015-11-29 Thread Leonardo
Issue closed.

I've omitted to register "offline" package (git repo is on local disk) with 
command:
Pkg.register("", "git://.git")

Thanks for all suggestions

Leonardo


Il giorno lunedì 23 novembre 2015 09:06:47 UTC+1, Leonardo ha scritto:
>
> Moreover, digging into Pkg code, I've found that version is returned by 
> Pkg.Read.installed_version(), which requires firstly a call to 
> Pkg.Read.available(pkgname::AbstractString), but calling this last method 
> from REPL I get an empty Dict also for "normal" packages.
> Maybe because Base (and all sub-packages) is precompiled?
>
> Leonardo
>
>
>
> Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 20:06:45 UTC+1, Leonardo ha scritto:
>>
>> Yes, but with no results (I've forgotten to indicate it in previous 
>> message)
>>
>> I've tagged with Pkg.tag() after package was commited and tagged with 
>> git: state of source is in correct state to do this?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Leonardo
>>
>>
>> Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 10:41:27 UTC+1, Kristoffer Carlsson ha 
>> scritto:
>>>
>>> Did you tag with Pkg.tag("...")?
>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: Versioning for unregistered Packages

2015-11-23 Thread Leonardo
Moreover, digging into Pkg code, I've found that version is returned by 
Pkg.Read.installed_version(), which requires firstly a call to 
Pkg.Read.available(pkgname::AbstractString), but calling this last method 
from REPL I get an empty Dict also for "normal" packages.
Maybe because Base (and all sub-packages) is precompiled?

Leonardo



Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 20:06:45 UTC+1, Leonardo ha scritto:
>
> Yes, but with no results (I've forgotten to indicate it in previous 
> message)
>
> I've tagged with Pkg.tag() after package was commited and tagged with 
> git: state of source is in correct state to do this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Leonardo
>
>
> Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 10:41:27 UTC+1, Kristoffer Carlsson ha 
> scritto:
>>
>> Did you tag with Pkg.tag("...")?
>
>

[julia-users] Re: Versioning for unregistered Packages

2015-11-20 Thread Leonardo
Yes, but with no results (I've forgotten to indicate it in previous message)

I've tagged with Pkg.tag() after package was commited and tagged with git: 
state of source is in correct state to do this?

Thanks

Leonardo


Il giorno venerdì 20 novembre 2015 10:41:27 UTC+1, Kristoffer Carlsson ha 
scritto:
>
> Did you tag with Pkg.tag("...")?