[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Arch Call]

I am getting fma not defined!  It is probably related to line 22.

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> I wrote this  FloatTest 
> 
>  to 
> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>  It is done immediately.
> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
> the github site.
>
>
>
>
>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

Thank you for running it.  My guess is that, for your environment, this is 
false:  VERSION >= v"0.4.0-dev+2823"
I am putting that test in now. If that is true -- pls let me know.

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:17:02 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote:
>
> I am getting fma not defined!  It is probably related to line 22.
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>>
>> I wrote this  FloatTest 
>> 
>>  to 
>> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
>> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
>> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>>  It is done immediately.
>> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
>> the github site.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

I would appreciate hearing from a few supercomputer users and a few (shh, 
it's new hardware) users.

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:24:35 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> Thank you for running it.  My guess is that, for your environment, this is 
> false:  VERSION >= v"0.4.0-dev+2823"
> I am putting that test in now. If that is true -- pls let me know.
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:17:02 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote:
>>
>> I am getting fma not defined!  It is probably related to line 22.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wrote this  FloatTest 
>>> 
>>>  to 
>>> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
>>> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
>>> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>>>  It is done immediately.
>>> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
>>> the github site.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

thanks for running it

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 5:33:10 AM UTC-4, Nils Gudat wrote:
>
> Not sure that this is what you meant by "(shh, it's new hardware)", but on 
> a Surface Pro 3 running Windows 10 the test passes. 
>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

I'm hoping for feedback from a variety of environments, hardware and OS. 
 Your information about Win10 is appreciated.


On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:19:07 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> thanks for running it
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 5:33:10 AM UTC-4, Nils Gudat wrote:
>>
>> Not sure that this is what you meant by "(shh, it's new hardware)", but 
>> on a Surface Pro 3 running Windows 10 the test passes. 
>>
>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

(when version 0.4 is released, you will have fma support)

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:03:06 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote:
>
> You have made some changes to the script and I now get!
>
> The numerics tested work properly.
>The version you are using does not support fma.
>
>
> I am running 3.11 on Windows 10 with 64 bit...Arch
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>>
>> I wrote this  FloatTest  to 
>> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
>> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
>> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>>  It is done immediately.
>> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
>> the github site.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Nils Gudat]

Not sure that this is what you meant by "(shh, it's new hardware)", but on 
a Surface Pro 3 running Windows 10 the test passes. 

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Arch Call]

You have made some changes to the script and I now get!

The numerics tested work properly.
 The version you are using does not support fma.


I am running 3.11 on Windows 10 with 64 bit...Arch

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> I wrote this  FloatTest  to 
> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>  It is done immediately.
> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
> the github site.
>
>
>
>
>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Jeffrey Sarnoff]

Thank you.  The information is correct for your system.

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:03:06 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote:
>
> You have made some changes to the script and I now get!
>
> The numerics tested work properly.
>The version you are using does not support fma.
>
>
> I am running 3.11 on Windows 10 with 64 bit...Arch
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>>
>> I wrote this  FloatTest  to 
>> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
>> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
>> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>>  It is done immediately.
>> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
>> the github site.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

[Seth]

 The numerics tested work properly.
on

Julia Version 0.4.0-pre+7107
Commit 4e44a1c (2015-08-31 16:51 UTC)
Platform Info:
  System: Darwin (x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0)
  CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5557U CPU @ 3.10GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)
  LAPACK: libopenblas
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-3.3


On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 10:04:34 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> I wrote this  FloatTest  to 
> find out if three things that should be true of numerics with Julia hold 
> for the wide variety of working environments in use.
> It is 40 lines -- just click 'raw', copy it and paste it into your REPL. 
>  It is done immediately.
> If a test fails, please note that with basic system infoas an 'issue' at 
> the github site.
>
>
>
>
>