Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Elliot Saba
Yes sorry about that.  This has now been fixed.  Thanks for reporting!
-E

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Iain Dunning 
wrote:

> There was an issue and the unstable nightly version got pushed to
> juliareleases - should be fixed soon.
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:36:13 AM UTC-4, K leo wrote:
>>
>> Removed the binary update and compiled julia from the 0.3.0+6 source.
>> Things become usual.
>>
>> On 2014年09月23日 18:55, K Leo wrote:
>> > Sorry for double posting.
>> >
>> > There is nothing special with the print statement.  It has been simply:
>> >
>> > println(file, A, ",", B, ",", C)
>> >
>> > And with that I usually got:
>> >
>> > 162038.8,160.2,0.26118204
>> >
>> > The update came in today from the julia release PPA for Ubuntu:
>> > https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/
>> juliareleases?field.series_filter=trusty
>> >
>> > I wonder if there is a way to revert back?
>> >
>> > On 2014年09月23日 16:51, Ivar Nesje wrote:
>> >> Please don't double post your questions
>> >> .
>> >>
>> >> How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet
>> >> been updated
>> >>  with
>> >> links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself as a 11
>> >> days old nightly version. What link did you use to get the wrong
>> >> version?
>> >>
>> >> It is hard to know whether the printing is correct, when you don't
>> >> provide example code. It seems like you are printing Float32 and
>> >> Float16 values, and they intentionally print differently from the
>> >> normal Float64 values.
>> >>
>> >> Ivar
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> kl. 07:42:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 23. september 2014 skrev K leo følgende:
>> >>
>> >> A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a
>> >> string
>> >> which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on
>> >> what
>> >> to do?
>> >>
>> >> On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote:
>> >> > Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543.
>> >> >
>> >> > println to file now get something like the following. Is this
>> >> > intended?  How can I get normal decimals?
>> >> >
>> >> > 162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0
>> >> >
>> >> >_
>> >> >_   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical
>> computing
>> >> >   (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation:
>> http://docs.julialang.org
>> >> >_ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help.
>> >> >   | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
>> >> >   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11
>> >> 13:47 UTC)
>> >> >  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master)
>> >> > |__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>


Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Iain Dunning
There was an issue and the unstable nightly version got pushed to 
juliareleases - should be fixed soon.

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:36:13 AM UTC-4, K leo wrote:
>
> Removed the binary update and compiled julia from the 0.3.0+6 source.   
> Things become usual. 
>
> On 2014年09月23日 18:55, K Leo wrote: 
> > Sorry for double posting. 
> > 
> > There is nothing special with the print statement.  It has been simply: 
> > 
> > println(file, A, ",", B, ",", C) 
> > 
> > And with that I usually got: 
> > 
> > 162038.8,160.2,0.26118204 
> > 
> > The update came in today from the julia release PPA for Ubuntu: 
> > 
> https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/juliareleases?field.series_filter=trusty
>  
> > 
> > I wonder if there is a way to revert back? 
> > 
> > On 2014年09月23日 16:51, Ivar Nesje wrote: 
> >> Please don't double post your questions 
> >> . 
> >> 
> >> How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet 
> >> been updated 
> >>  with 
> >> links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself as a 11 
> >> days old nightly version. What link did you use to get the wrong 
> >> version? 
> >> 
> >> It is hard to know whether the printing is correct, when you don't 
> >> provide example code. It seems like you are printing Float32 and 
> >> Float16 values, and they intentionally print differently from the 
> >> normal Float64 values. 
> >> 
> >> Ivar 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> kl. 07:42:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 23. september 2014 skrev K leo følgende: 
> >> 
> >> A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a 
> >> string 
> >> which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on 
> >> what 
> >> to do? 
> >> 
> >> On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote: 
> >> > Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543. 
> >> > 
> >> > println to file now get something like the following. Is this 
> >> > intended?  How can I get normal decimals? 
> >> > 
> >> > 162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0 
> >> > 
> >> >_ 
> >> >_   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical computing 
> >> >   (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation: 
> http://docs.julialang.org 
> >> >_ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help. 
> >> >   | | | | | | |/ _` |  | 
> >> >   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11 
> >> 13:47 UTC) 
> >> >  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master) 
> >> > |__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu 
> >> > 
> >> 
> > 
>
>

Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread K Leo
Removed the binary update and compiled julia from the 0.3.0+6 source.  
Things become usual.


On 2014年09月23日 18:55, K Leo wrote:

Sorry for double posting.

There is nothing special with the print statement.  It has been simply:

println(file, A, ",", B, ",", C)

And with that I usually got:

162038.8,160.2,0.26118204

The update came in today from the julia release PPA for Ubuntu: 
https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/juliareleases?field.series_filter=trusty


I wonder if there is a way to revert back?

On 2014年09月23日 16:51, Ivar Nesje wrote:
Please don't double post your questions 
.


How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet 
been updated 
 with 
links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself as a 11 
days old nightly version. What link did you use to get the wrong 
version?


It is hard to know whether the printing is correct, when you don't 
provide example code. It seems like you are printing Float32 and 
Float16 values, and they intentionally print differently from the 
normal Float64 values.


Ivar


kl. 07:42:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 23. september 2014 skrev K leo følgende:

A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a
string
which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on
what
to do?

On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote:
> Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543.
>
> println to file now get something like the following. Is this
> intended?  How can I get normal decimals?
>
> 162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0
>
>_
>_   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical computing
>   (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org
>_ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help.
>   | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
>   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11
13:47 UTC)
>  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master)
> |__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu
>







Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread K Leo

Sorry for double posting.

There is nothing special with the print statement.  It has been simply:

println(file, A, ",", B, ",", C)

And with that I usually got:

162038.8,160.2,0.26118204

The update came in today from the julia release PPA for Ubuntu: 
https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/juliareleases?field.series_filter=trusty


I wonder if there is a way to revert back?

On 2014年09月23日 16:51, Ivar Nesje wrote:
Please don't double post your questions 
.


How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet 
been updated 
 with 
links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself as a 11 
days old nightly version. What link did you use to get the wrong version?


It is hard to know whether the printing is correct, when you don't 
provide example code. It seems like you are printing Float32 and 
Float16 values, and they intentionally print differently from the 
normal Float64 values.


Ivar


kl. 07:42:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 23. september 2014 skrev K leo følgende:

A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a
string
which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on
what
to do?

On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote:
> Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543.
>
> println to file now get something like the following.  Is this
> intended?  How can I get normal decimals?
>
> 162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0
>
>_
>_   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical computing
>   (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org
>_ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help.
>   | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
>   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11
13:47 UTC)
>  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master)
> |__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu
>





[julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Ivar Nesje
Please don't double post your questions 
.

How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet been 
updated  with 
links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself as a 11 days 
old nightly version. What link did you use to get the wrong version?

It is hard to know whether the printing is correct, when you don't provide 
example code. It seems like you are printing Float32 and Float16 values, 
and they intentionally print differently from the normal Float64 values.

Ivar


kl. 07:42:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 23. september 2014 skrev K leo følgende:
>
> A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a string 
> which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on what 
> to do? 
>
> On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote: 
> > Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543. 
> > 
> > println to file now get something like the following.  Is this 
> > intended?  How can I get normal decimals? 
> > 
> > 162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0 
> > 
> >_ 
> >_   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical computing 
> >   (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org 
> >_ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help. 
> >   | | | | | | |/ _` |  | 
> >   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11 13:47 UTC) 
> >  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master) 
> > |__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu 
> > 
>
>

[julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-22 Thread K Leo
A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a string 
which then can not be easily converted to a float.  Any advice on what 
to do?


On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote:

Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543.

println to file now get something like the following.  Is this 
intended?  How can I get normal decimals?


162038.8f0,float16(160.2),0.26118204f0

   _
   _   _ _(_)_ |  A fresh approach to technical computing
  (_) | (_) (_)|  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org
   _ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "help()" for help.
  | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
  | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.4.0-dev+543 (2014-09-11 13:47 UTC)
 _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit c79e349 (11 days old master)
|__/   |  x86_64-linux-gnu