Over at LightGraphs we have been discussing support for collections indexed 
by integers that can be either dense like Vector{T} or sparse like 
Dict{Int,T}.
The idea is that you want to collect some T's together indexed by a range 
of integers 1:n. Often you will have a value for all or most of the indices 
and should use a Vector{T} for that case. But sometimes you will only have 
a few values and don't want to allocate O(n) storage just to hold a much 
smaller amount of data.

What is the best way to express this in types? Does 
Union{Associative{Int,T}, AbstractArray{T}} express this with no 
performance penalty? Is there any reason to avoid Union types?

Thanks,
James

Reply via email to