Re: [julia-users] Re: polynomial terms in formula specification

[dnm]

I think the formula interface is slated to get an overhaul..but someone can 
correct me if I'm wrong. 

On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:49:18 PM UTC-4, Michael Borregaard wrote:
>
> And... Sorry if I sounded unnecessarily critical, I just hoped to argue 
> the case for a change. I know all decisions in Julia are based on careful 
> consideration of all the options. 
>

Re: [julia-users] Re: polynomial terms in formula specification

[Michael Krabbe Borregaard]

And... Sorry if I sounded unnecessarily critical, I just hoped to argue the
case for a change. I know all decisions in Julia are based on careful
consideration of all the options.

Re: [julia-users] Re: polynomial terms in formula specification

[Tamas Papp]

On Mon, Jun 27 2016, Michael Borregaard wrote:

> I have no strong feelings about then '1 +' , it will require typing a few 
> unneccesary extra characters, but perhaps there is a pedagogical gain from 
> requiring people to specify that they want an intercept fitted as well.

I have nothing to say about your other points, but I love the explicit
intercept (1+), and I hope it stays.

Best,

Tamas