Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread Michaël Michaud

Hi,

i am with you on february 4th, essentially we could do it this week, but why 
put pressure on it ;)
let's branch the revision on release of 1.5.1

fine

What do you think ? What is your planning ?
release 1.5.1 beginning fbruary and having an izpack based installer then as 
well ;)

fine again

By the way, did you read my mail about the windows batch issue ?
was there another one? the wow64 issue is fixed.
another issue appeared after you added [] to test empty variables (here 
attached the private mail I sent on january 9th)


Michaël


ede

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel




--- Begin Message ---

Hi Ede,

After so many years, I'm still struggling with batch pitfall like 
whitespaces and other special chars.

Don't know why you used [], but I cannot change the jre by hand anymore.
I wanted to test with my 1.5 jvm :
set JAVA_HOME=C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre1.5.0_22

the batch stopped working until I changed
if NOT  [%JAVA_HOME%]==[] set JAVA=%JAVA_HOME%\bin\%JAVA_BIN%
by
if NOT "%JAVA_HOME%"=="" set JAVA=%JAVA_HOME%\bin\%JAVA_BIN%

Thanks to double check and to commit if you have a proper solution.

Michaël


Le 07/01/2012 18:16, e...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit :

Revision: 2590
   http://jump-pilot.svn.sourceforge.net/jump-pilot/?rev=2590&view=rev
Author:   edso
Date: 2012-01-07 17:16:45 + (Sat, 07 Jan 2012)
Log Message:
---
- polish the wow64 workaround
- SETTINGS_HOME now properly enables relocation of 
workbench_state,workbench_properties,openjump.log
- commented default SETTINGS_HOME is now ~user/.openjump

Modified Paths:
--
 core/trunk/scripts/oj_windows.bat

Modified: core/trunk/scripts/oj_windows.bat
===
(Binary files differ)

This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the 
world's largest Open Source development site.


--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
___
Jump-pilot-svn-notify mailing list
jump-pilot-svn-not...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-svn-notify




--- End Message ---
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.01.2012 22:42, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>>> Last time I compiled with my good old ant build file (yesterday),
>>> I get the following version named
>>> Version ${version.number} ${version.release} rev.${version.revision}
>> could you tell me when you think it is time for a release and let me compile 
>> it on linux? currently the file permission in zip distros are sometimes 777 
>> and i can't seem to convince maven to fix that correctly. a leftover from 
>> the linux repackaging is a recompress fix permissions routine which i'd 
>> really like to apply on the final releases.
> Sorry, I do not understand clearly your concern.

it's a unix thing. extracting the zip without permission fix leads to 
folders/files read and writable to all users. 

> 
> The release date on sourceforge could be on february, 4th.
> My wishes are
> - to synchronize versions 1.5.1 on sourceforge and on osgeo-dvd
> - to make it as bug free as possible and with language files as complete 
> as possible
> - to let committers work again without restriction as soon as possible
>(but before, I think it's better to finish the work you are doing on 
> release
> procedure, then, to release 1.5.1 or to branch until 1.5.1 release)

i am with you on february 4th, essentially we could do it this week, but why 
put pressure on it ;) 
let's branch the revision on release of 1.5.1

> What do you think ? What is your planning ?

release 1.5.1 beginning fbruary and having an izpack based installer then as 
well ;)

> By the way, did you read my mail about the windows batch issue ?

was there another one? the wow64 issue is fixed.

ede

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi,
>> Last time I compiled with my good old ant build file (yesterday),
>> I get the following version named
>> Version ${version.number} ${version.release} rev.${version.revision}
> could you tell me when you think it is time for a release and let me compile 
> it on linux? currently the file permission in zip distros are sometimes 777 
> and i can't seem to convince maven to fix that correctly. a leftover from the 
> linux repackaging is a recompress fix permissions routine which i'd really 
> like to apply on the final releases.
Sorry, I do not understand clearly your concern.

The release date on sourceforge could be on february, 4th.
My wishes are
- to synchronize versions 1.5.1 on sourceforge and on osgeo-dvd
- to make it as bug free as possible and with language files as complete 
as possible
- to let committers work again without restriction as soon as possible
   (but before, I think it's better to finish the work you are doing on 
release
procedure, then, to release 1.5.1 or to branch until 1.5.1 release)

What do you think ? What is your planning ?

By the way, did you read my mail about the windows batch issue ?

regards,

Michaël
>
> ede
>
> --
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] latest changes on SVN

2012-01-12 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi,
> the changes you committed - is that for 1.5.2 or so? or will that go 
> into 1.5.1? just asking - with respect to translation.
> it's a bugfix, hence it should go into 1.5.1 .. regarding translation i am 
> not concerned about some missing strings ;) we've got enough of them in most 
> languages ..ede
Agree with that,

Michaël
>
> --
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


[JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3472008 ] AssertionFailedException with two identical attribute name

2012-01-12 Thread SourceForge . net
Bugs item #3472008, was opened at 2012-01-10 13:28
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by michaudm
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3472008&group_id=118054

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: OpenJUMP - Menu - Edit
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: AssertionFailedException with two identical attribute name

Initial Comment:
How can two identical attribute names happen ?
- with a sql query : ex. select geom, name, name, name from city
  (although I don't think a plain table can have duplicate names)
- it can be saved/read to/from a shapefile, a jml (with different results !)
- feature schema edition tool pevent such a schema edition

What happens ?
- a AssertionFailedException is thrown by plugins like
  * combine selected layers
  * clip map to fence
  * there are other problems if one try to change an attribute value using its 
name...

What to do ?
The minimum would be to throw a clearer message
Maybe sufficient, automatic renaming seems a bit dangerous
Refusing data loading maybe frustrating (although getting a yellow warning 
light be useful)

Michaël 
 

--

Comment By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Date: 2012-01-12 12:49

Message:
Problem in CombineSelectedLayers should be fixed, while problem in
ClipMapFence will throw a better message and report the problem in the
outputFrame.
Michaël 2012-01-12

--

Comment By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Date: 2012-01-11 00:03

Message:
In the case of "combine selected layers", the problem is different.
It is because the Geometry Attribute is not handled properly when it is not
named GEOMETRY or when several layers have different names for Geometry
attribute.
==> The plugin tries to create a second Geometry Attribute

Michaël

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3472008&group_id=118054

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


[JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3472008 ] AssertionFailedException with two identical attribute name

2012-01-12 Thread SourceForge . net
Bugs item #3472008, was opened at 2012-01-10 13:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by michaudm
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3472008&group_id=118054

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: OpenJUMP - Menu - Edit
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: AssertionFailedException with two identical attribute name

Initial Comment:
How can two identical attribute names happen ?
- with a sql query : ex. select geom, name, name, name from city
  (although I don't think a plain table can have duplicate names)
- it can be saved/read to/from a shapefile, a jml (with different results !)
- feature schema edition tool pevent such a schema edition

What happens ?
- a AssertionFailedException is thrown by plugins like
  * combine selected layers
  * clip map to fence
  * there are other problems if one try to change an attribute value using its 
name...

What to do ?
The minimum would be to throw a clearer message
Maybe sufficient, automatic renaming seems a bit dangerous
Refusing data loading maybe frustrating (although getting a yellow warning 
light be useful)

Michaël 
 

--

>Comment By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Date: 2012-01-12 12:49

Message:
Problem in CombineSelectedLayers should be fixed, while problem in
ClipMapFence will throw a better message and report the problem in the
outputFrame.
Michaël 2012-01-12

--

Comment By: michael michaud (michaudm)
Date: 2012-01-11 00:03

Message:
In the case of "combine selected layers", the problem is different.
It is because the Geometry Attribute is not handled properly when it is not
named GEOMETRY or when several layers have different names for Geometry
attribute.
==> The plugin tries to create a second Geometry Attribute

Michaël

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3472008&group_id=118054

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] latest changes on SVN

2012-01-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.01.2012 21:23, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Michael,
> 
> the changes you committed - is that for 1.5.2 or so?
> or will that go into 1.5.1?
> 
> just asking - with respect to translation.
> 

it's a bugfix, hence it should go into 1.5.1 .. regarding translation i am not 
concerned about some missing strings ;) we've got enough of them in most 
languages ..ede

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.01.2012 08:39, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Last time I compiled with my good old ant build file (yesterday),
> I get the following version named
> Version ${version.number} ${version.release} rev.${version.revision}

could you tell me when you think it is time for a release and let me compile it 
on linux? currently the file permission in zip distros are sometimes 777 and i 
can't seem to convince maven to fix that correctly. a leftover from the linux 
repackaging is a recompress fix permissions routine which i'd really like to 
apply on the final releases.

ede

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


[JPP-Devel] latest changes on SVN

2012-01-12 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Michael,

the changes you committed - is that for 1.5.2 or so?
or will that go into 1.5.1?

just asking - with respect to translation.

stefan

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread edgar . soldin
just added generation of apidocs to the release profile. this will only work if 
javadoc is in the executable path and _wont_ complain if not. apidocs end up in 
target/apidocs.

..ede

On 12.01.2012 15:41, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> and: automation is nice but otherwise I would update just for each 
> official release.
> 
> Am 12.01.12 15:37, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>> When I did the releases I copied the javadoc manually to that folder -
>> Using the javadoc created by the ANT script.
>>
>> the filed are from 2011. So not sure who copied the stuff there.
>>
>> stefan
>>
>>>
>>> * for documentation, I use the following url, but I'm not sure it is
>>> uptodate
>>> any idea how to automatize that ?
>>> http://jump-pilot.sourceforge.net/javadoc/openjump_javadoc/
>>>

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread Stefan Steiniger
and: automation is nice but otherwise I would update just for each 
official release.

Am 12.01.12 15:37, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
> When I did the releases I copied the javadoc manually to that folder -
> Using the javadoc created by the ANT script.
>
> the filed are from 2011. So not sure who copied the stuff there.
>
> stefan
>
>>
>> * for documentation, I use the following url, but I'm not sure it is
>> uptodate
>> any idea how to automatize that ?
>> http://jump-pilot.sourceforge.net/javadoc/openjump_javadoc/
>>
>
> --
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread Stefan Steiniger
When I did the releases I copied the javadoc manually to that folder -
Using the javadoc created by the ANT script.

the filed are from 2011. So not sure who copied the stuff there.

stefan

>
> * for documentation, I use the following url, but I'm not sure it is
> uptodate
> any idea how to automatize that ?
> http://jump-pilot.sourceforge.net/javadoc/openjump_javadoc/
>

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] revision of OJ LiveDVD docs

2012-01-12 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Michael,

thanks for the changes

> Thanks for feedback about doc for osgeo-dvd.
> I did the small updates you suggeted except :
> - the one about macosx (tell me if I finally have to change)
no need to change (everything is alright)

> - the one about screenshots (will do the change if someone has some time
> to prepare new screenshots)
agreed

stefan

>
> Michaël
>
> Le 11/01/2012 22:42, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
>> mhm.. true,
>>
>> I made those figures quite some time ago (3 years?) from images of the
>> (german) tutorial - I think. Though, not sure if we need to be that exact ;)
>>
>> but more opinions are welcome
>> stefan
>>
>> Am 11.01.12 21:51, schrieb Giuseppe Aruta:
>>> Another couple othing
>>>
>>> C) the figure in
>>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/overview/openjump_overview.html
>>> is not updated to OpenJUMP 1.5. Editing toolbox shows the ew poligonize
>>> tool from Michael, and both attribute windows have their toolbar on the
>>> top of the windows (not on the left side).
>>> Sorry to be so accurate ;-(
>>>
>>> Peppe
>>>
>>> 
>>> *Da:* "edgar.sol...@web.de"
>>> *A:* OpenJump develop and use
>>> *Inviato:* Mercoledì 11 Gennaio 2012 13:51
>>> *Oggetto:* Re: [JPP-Devel] revision of OJ LiveDVD docs
>>>
>>> two things:
>>>
>>> A) the logo is not up to date. please use one from svn/core/trunk/icon
>>>
>>> B) regarding "Starting OpenJUMP"
>>>
>>> OSGeo Live-DVD: start OpenJUMP link on desktop or run /usr/bin/openjump
>>>
>>> should suffice.. ede
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2012 13:05, Michaël Michaud wrote:
>>>>   Hi,
>>>>
>>>>   Modifications made on osgeo-live-dvd documentation for 5.5 are 
>>> already
>>>>   visible here :
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/overview/openjump_overview.html
>>>>   and
>>>>
>>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/quickstart/openjump_quickstart.html
>>>>
>>>>   There is at least two things I have to fix :
>>>>   switch version number to 1.5.1 in overview
>>>>   change the broken link to openjump.sh to a relative path (should I 
>>> write
>>>>   user/Desktop/openjump.sh ?)
>>>>
>>>>   If you want to change anything else, please, tell me
>>>>
>>>>   Michaël
>>>>
>>>>   Le 09/01/2012 21:27, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
>>>>>   Hi Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>>   thanks - yes the idea was to see first how/where OJ is installed on 
>>> the
>>>>>   LiveDVD and can be accessed from the Ubuntu menu. The "General" is 
>>> for
>>>>>   users that download etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>   so - next iteration
>>>>>   stefan
>>>>>
>>>>>   Am 09.01.12 00:37, schrieb Michaël Michaud:
>>>>>>   Hi Stefan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I comitted the changes. But I did not check the html-formatted
>>> result yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   There is one think that will surely not work. It is the link you
>>> added :
>>>>>>   OSGeo Live-DVD: go to XXX
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I tried
>>>>>>   OSGeo Live-DVD: go to<../../../app-conf/openjump/openjump.sh>
>>>>>>   but I doubt it will be a valid link
>>>>>>   maybe you just wanted to write the path (usr/.../...)
>>>>>>   Will need to fix that before next iteration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Michaël
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Le 08/01/2012 20:26, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
>>>   I have also made revision to the quickstart but I would like to 
>>> see
>>>   first how OJ can be accessed from the LiveDVD and were sample 
>>> data are
>>>   stored on the dvd
>>>
>>>   stefan
>>>
>>>   Am 08.01.12 19:15, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>>>   Ok Michael, - I now found your docs attached - sorry.
>>>>   I attach my version of the OJ overview.
>>>>
>>>>   but still my question: should I commit on my own (after asking 
>>> for a
>>>>   login) or will you?
>>>>
>>>>   I also attach the sphinx doc.
>>>>   Stefan
>>>>
>>>>   Am 08.01.12 18:37, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>>>>   Oh.. I just see, that I probably not edited your lastest
>>> version, as I
>>>>>   have only access to the OSGeo SVN version.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Where is yours Michael?
>>>>>
>>>>>   Am 08.01.12 17:42, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>>>>>   Hei Michael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I made a couple of small changes to the OJ description.
>>>>>>   How are we going with those? Shall I send the doc via the list
>>> to you
>>>>>>   and you will commit it? (and people can see&   revise the doc 
>>> on the
>>>>>>   list...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Or shall I ask for commit permissions to Osgeo as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Same would hold then for the quickstart...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   cheers,
>>>>>>   stefan
>>>>>>
>

Re: [JPP-Devel] Compilation and release configuration

2012-01-12 Thread edgar . soldin
hi Michael,

On 12.01.2012 08:39, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Last time I compiled with my good old ant build file (yesterday),
> I get the following version named
> Version ${version.number} ${version.release} rev.${version.revision}

it's easier to replace placeholders

> OK, time for me to switch to maven, I suppose
> Could you give some hints or a documentation for newbies :
> The old pom file used to have 2 small dependencies.
> Did you remove them to gather everything in a single pom file ?

no i retailored as follows, all files now in etc/mvn to not fill up trunk root 
needlessly
bin_zip-_.xml
- currently 4 files, the assemblies that pick the correct assembly components 
for the specific edition e.g. bin_zip-core_snapshot.xml
 . remember we keep the language files extracted in the snapshots, while 
releases do not carry sources in oj.jar ;)
cmp_oj-.xml
- oj.jar in different flavors
cmp_core.xml
- includes all files for the CORE distro
cmp_plus.xml
- includes additional files for PLUS

> What are the options
> - to simply compile
> - to release
> - to release sources*, doc...
> - to release automatically the NB?

A) i don't actually only compile. it is used locally or on a server to package 
releases. we would have to overhaul it some more for that as it currently 
compiles into target/classes .

B) mvn release [-P  -D version.number=X.X.X [-D 
version.release=]]]

- you can select one or more profiles core, plus (both are the snapshots) or 
release (builds releases for CORE and PLUS)
- without a given profile CORE snapshot will be built by default
- for releases you might want to give a version.number (default=unknown) and a 
version.release (default=stable)

C) didn't think about sources so far, but if you'd like to have them zipped 
automatically i'll make it happen. what do you mean with 'doc,...', javadocs?

D) releasing to sf.net is done via shell scripting on my server, statically to 
snapshots. so if you want to release a release build on your site you will have 
to manually push it to sf.net files section.
 
> On JPP download page, after my last change, 10 files have been uploaded
> in NB directory (over 200 Mo) !
> Is that really necessary ?

probably not ;) .. i was playing with linux distros to have native libs have 
their symlinks withing the distro. we will probably end up having izpack 
setting these up during installation.

> What are the differences between
> OpenJUMP-x.y.z-r-CORE.zip and
> OpenJUMP--mm-dd-r-CORE.zip ?

http://www.mail-archive.com/jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09977.html

> How the final release will be recognized from NB ?

we build them with 
 mvn release -P release -D version.number=X.X.X
and release them to sf.net/files/OpenJUMP/X.X.X

> Why are there as many linux distro as standard distro ?

essentially tgz versions of the zip. has to do with the symlink issue, but i'll 
drop this again.
 
> * for documentation, I use the following url, but I'm not sure it is 
> uptodate
> any idea how to automatize that ?
> http://jump-pilot.sourceforge.net/javadoc/openjump_javadoc/

would have to find out. if not by maven i could simply run javadoc daily and 
upload the result to sf.net webspace.

> 
> Sorry for asking so many questions and thanks for all the work done on 
> release side.

it's work in progress. when it's finished please remind me to update the 
wikipage accordingly... ede

> 
> Michaël
> 
> --
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] revision of OJ LiveDVD docs

2012-01-12 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi,

Thanks for feedback about doc for osgeo-dvd.
I did the small updates you suggeted except :
- the one about macosx (tell me if I finally have to change)
- the one about screenshots (will do the change if someone has some time 
to prepare new screenshots)

Michaël

Le 11/01/2012 22:42, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
> mhm.. true,
>
> I made those figures quite some time ago (3 years?) from images of the
> (german) tutorial - I think. Though, not sure if we need to be that exact ;)
>
> but more opinions are welcome
> stefan
>
> Am 11.01.12 21:51, schrieb Giuseppe Aruta:
>> Another couple othing
>>
>> C) the figure in
>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/overview/openjump_overview.html
>> is not updated to OpenJUMP 1.5. Editing toolbox shows the ew poligonize
>> tool from Michael, and both attribute windows have their toolbar on the
>> top of the windows (not on the left side).
>> Sorry to be so accurate ;-(
>>
>> Peppe
>>
>> 
>> *Da:* "edgar.sol...@web.de"
>> *A:* OpenJump develop and use
>> *Inviato:* Mercoledì 11 Gennaio 2012 13:51
>> *Oggetto:* Re: [JPP-Devel] revision of OJ LiveDVD docs
>>
>> two things:
>>
>> A) the logo is not up to date. please use one from svn/core/trunk/icon
>>
>> B) regarding "Starting OpenJUMP"
>>
>> OSGeo Live-DVD: start OpenJUMP link on desktop or run /usr/bin/openjump
>>
>> should suffice.. ede
>>
>> On 11.01.2012 13:05, Michaël Michaud wrote:
>>   >  Hi,
>>   >
>>   >  Modifications made on osgeo-live-dvd documentation for 5.5 are already
>>   >  visible here :
>>   >
>>   >
>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/overview/openjump_overview.html
>>   >  and
>>   >
>> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/quickstart/openjump_quickstart.html
>>   >
>>   >  There is at least two things I have to fix :
>>   >  switch version number to 1.5.1 in overview
>>   >  change the broken link to openjump.sh to a relative path (should I write
>>   >  user/Desktop/openjump.sh ?)
>>   >
>>   >  If you want to change anything else, please, tell me
>>   >
>>   >  Michaël
>>   >
>>   >  Le 09/01/2012 21:27, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
>>   >>  Hi Michael,
>>   >>
>>   >>  thanks - yes the idea was to see first how/where OJ is installed on the
>>   >>  LiveDVD and can be accessed from the Ubuntu menu. The "General" is for
>>   >>  users that download etc.
>>   >>
>>   >>  so - next iteration
>>   >>  stefan
>>   >>
>>   >>  Am 09.01.12 00:37, schrieb Michaël Michaud:
>>   >>>  Hi Stefan,
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  I comitted the changes. But I did not check the html-formatted
>> result yet.
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  There is one think that will surely not work. It is the link you
>> added :
>>   >>>  OSGeo Live-DVD: go to XXX
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  I tried
>>   >>>  OSGeo Live-DVD: go to<../../../app-conf/openjump/openjump.sh>
>>   >>>  but I doubt it will be a valid link
>>   >>>  maybe you just wanted to write the path (usr/.../...)
>>   >>>  Will need to fix that before next iteration.
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  Michaël
>>   >>>
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  Le 08/01/2012 20:26, Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
>>     I have also made revision to the quickstart but I would like to see
>>     first how OJ can be accessed from the LiveDVD and were sample data 
>> are
>>     stored on the dvd
>>   
>>     stefan
>>   
>>     Am 08.01.12 19:15, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>   >  Ok Michael, - I now found your docs attached - sorry.
>>   >  I attach my version of the OJ overview.
>>   >
>>   >  but still my question: should I commit on my own (after asking for a
>>   >  login) or will you?
>>   >
>>   >  I also attach the sphinx doc.
>>   >  Stefan
>>   >
>>   >  Am 08.01.12 18:37, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>   >>  Oh.. I just see, that I probably not edited your lastest
>> version, as I
>>   >>  have only access to the OSGeo SVN version.
>>   >>
>>   >>  Where is yours Michael?
>>   >>
>>   >>  Am 08.01.12 17:42, schrieb Stefan Steiniger:
>>   >>>  Hei Michael,
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  I made a couple of small changes to the OJ description.
>>   >>>  How are we going with those? Shall I send the doc via the list
>> to you
>>   >>>  and you will commit it? (and people can see&  revise the doc on 
>> the
>>   >>>  list...)
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  Or shall I ask for commit permissions to Osgeo as well?
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  Same would hold then for the quickstart...
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  cheers,
>>   >>>  stefan
>>   >>>
>>   >>>
>> --
>>   >>>
>>   >>>  Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a
>>   >>>  complex
>>   >>>  infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure
>>   >>>  access to
>>   >>>  virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy
>> virtual
>>