Re: [JPP-Devel] I: Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK Only for LiveDVD 5.5?

2012-01-06 Thread edgar . soldin
On 05.01.2012 11:42, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 we should ship on OSGeo-Live OpenJUMP 1.5, the plus version, with ECW 
 libraries activated

i understand that osgeo focusses on open source in the complete form. as oj 
bundled with ecw has restrictions
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/jump-pilot/index.php?title=OpenJUMP_Licensing
we should probably go with CORE but come up with a message top check PLUS if a 
user tries to load JP2/ECW.

..ede

PS: Where was the message/ok dialog in oj again?


--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


[JPP-Devel] I: Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK Only for LiveDVD 5.5?

2012-01-05 Thread Giuseppe Aruta



- Messaggio inoltrato -
Da: Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it
A: Michaël Michaud michael.mich...@free.fr 
Inviato: Giovedì 5 Gennaio 2012 11:05
Oggetto: Re: Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK Only for LiveDVD 5.5?
 

Hi all,
we should ship on OSGeo-Live OpenJUMP 1.5, the plus version, with ECW libraries 
activated

regards

Peppe



 Da: Michaël Michaud michael.mich...@free.fr
A: Edgar Soldin ed...@soldin.de; Stefan Steiniger sst...@geo.uzh.ch; 
Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it; Rahkonen Jukka 
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi 
Inviato: Martedì 3 Gennaio 2012 22:03
Oggetto: Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK Only for LiveDVD 5.5?
 

Hi all,

I transfer this mail from cameron about which java version will be
included in next OSGeo-Live releases

Michaël

 Message original  
Sujet: Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK Only for LiveDVD 5.5? 
Date : Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:28:51 +1100 
De : Cameron Shorter cameron.shor...@gmail.com 
Pour : Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com 
Copie à : Geoserver-devel geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrea Aime 
aa...@opengeo.org, live-d...@lists.osgeo.org 

Andre, Even, Jody,
Thank you for your insights.
Based on your advice, it sounds like it will be unwise to try to
migrate all java based OSGeo applications to OpenJDK by our
OSGeo-Live5.5 release due in March 2012.

As such, I propose that Sun Java be included on OSGeo-Live5.5.

I'm hopeful that we can find enough space to include OpenJDK,
(ideally version 7) on this and  future OSGeo-Live releases, and
start moving all applications across to OpenJDK as soon as they are
available. This will mean that the OSGeo-Live community can be drawn
upon to help with testing which hopefully can be seen as a positive
for java projects.

Does this sound reasonable?

Alex, it would be great if you could start the build process so that
we can determine whether we can find sufficient space to include 2
versions of java on OSGeo-Live.

On 03/01/12 13:29, Jody Garnett wrote: 
Questions for Geotools developers:
1. Do geotools based applications work on OpenJDK now?

Not sure; even if they did without a build box configured with OpenJDK to 
ensure the library works in that environment it would not be considered a 
supported platform for production use. I always figure demo is almost more 
important then production use as it is a first impression.


By the same token I would not recommend projects based on GeoTools go live on 
OpenJDK without appropriate testing.


Perhaps the Geomajas guys could stand up a build box with OpenJDK? 
2. Is it possible to migrate geotools based applications to OpenJDK?

Yes; would required volunteer time; hardware to run a nightly build with that 
configuration and so on. I recently lost two weeks to a build box at my 
current work site that was incorrectly configured to use OpenJDK rather than 
Java 6. 
3. Can such migration happen before Feb 2012 (for OSGeo-Live 5.5)?

We can help with testing packaged applications, but are
  looking for guidance from projects on where we should be
  focusing our energy.

I do not think so; we would need hardware in place now.


Our developers are an even split between mac, linux and windows environments. 
As I understand it mac OpenJDK is not ready yet (with no sign of arrival); 
windows is troubled. 


I would wait for OpenJDK Java 7 to be released; and then set up a build box at 
that time.


Jody
On 31/12/11 19:34, Jody Garnett wrote: 
An easy one is to add the extensions into libs/ext and then run uDig without 
its jre folder so it uses the system default. 


Geosolutions (i.e. Simone or Andrea) is the best point of contact with 
respect to compatibility with OpenJDK. Personally I was not going to bother 
until Java 7 or Java 8.


You could also try talking to Andrea Antonello who at least uses Linux and 
may be able to test?


If you want you can also contact me officially as GeoTools Officer and I 
will take the question to the geotools-devel email list for you. However I 
expect I need a more than Open JDK (this page for example does not give me 
much to work from http://openjdk.java.net/install/).


-- 
Jody Garnett



On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 9:02 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Jody and others,

Do you know if anyone has tested the
viability of using OpenJDK with
JAI/ImageIO/ImageIO-EXT (with the geotools
based applications)?

What would be involved in testing this? Who
would know how?

On 30/12/11 20:29, Jody Garnett wrote: 
Need to check out how well or poorly OpenJDK does with the JAI / ImageIO / 
ImageIO-EXT combo for geotools based apps. 


-- 
Jody Garnett



On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 6:48 PM, Brian Hamlin wrote:
jsanz tells me that GeoNetwork is also running well under OpenJDK for 
him


let this thread be an entrypoint for Java-app