Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS

2010-05-07 Thread Muhammad Farooq

Hi Paul,
You will apply CoS/QoS configurations on AE interface not on AE members.
Regards,
Muhammad Farooq


 From: waller...@hotmail.com
 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:58:29 +1000
 Subject: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS
 
 
 Hi all,
 
  
 
 I can't find any documentation on CoS/QoS configuration on Aggregated 
 Ethernet from Junipers web site, if anyone knows any links pls share.
 
  
 
 I know what configuration I want to do I'm just not sure where it has to be 
 applied i.e on Gig interface, AE interface or ex interfaces.
 
 Regards
 Paul
 
 
 
 
 _
 New, Used, Demo, Dealer or Private? Find it at CarPoint.com.au
 http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/206222968/direct/01/
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS

2010-05-07 Thread Muhammad Farooq


Please also find below link covering all required configurations for CoS/QoS in 
JUNOS.
http://jnpr.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.1/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/config-guide-cos-TOC.html
Regards,
Muhammad Farooq

 From: scorpian...@hotmail.com
 To: waller...@hotmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 05:55:59 +
 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS
 
 
 Hi Paul,
 You will apply CoS/QoS configurations on AE interface not on AE members.
 Regards,
 Muhammad Farooq
 
 
  From: waller...@hotmail.com
  To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:58:29 +1000
  Subject: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS
  
  
  Hi all,
  
   
  
  I can't find any documentation on CoS/QoS configuration on Aggregated 
  Ethernet from Junipers web site, if anyone knows any links pls share.
  
   
  
  I know what configuration I want to do I'm just not sure where it has to be 
  applied i.e on Gig interface, AE interface or ex interfaces.
  
  Regards
  Paul
  
  
  

  _
  New, Used, Demo, Dealer or Private? Find it at CarPoint.com.au
  http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/206222968/direct/01/
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 _
 Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
 https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] EX and mirroring (ideally to GRE)

2010-05-07 Thread Bjørn Skovlund
Hi all,

I was wondering if someone has found a good solution to remote
mirror/analyze all traffic to/from a single IP?

I see that GRE tunnels is now working, but setting it as output to an
analyzer is not possible it seems. My Juniper rep. suggested a CCC,
but buying 100+ AFLs doesn't seem likely for me.

Any suggestions?

Cheers, Bjørn

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] XNM Reverse DNS lookup

2010-05-07 Thread Thomas Eichhorn
Hi all,

I currently run into the next problem with xnm, maybe
you have an idea:

If I do a login via xnm, the login takes about 30 secs - which is a
little bit long.

My idea behind this is, that the router tries to do a reverse lookup
of the connecting ip.

This fails/runs into an timeout because the router uses the nearest-by
nameserver, but the xnm connect comes from a RFC1918 IP on the
management interface - the nameserver usually don't know about
this and tries to resolve it - up to a timeout.

Do you have any idea howto disable reverse lookups on the router?

I have no problem to do it globally - but I do not want to remove
the nameservers completely..

Thanks for you help,
Tom
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS

2010-05-07 Thread Brad Fleming

On May 6, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Paul Waller wrote:

I can't find any documentation on CoS/QoS configuration on  
Aggregated Ethernet from Junipers web site, if anyone knows any  
links pls share.


I know what configuration I want to do I'm just not sure where it  
has to be applied i.e on Gig interface, AE interface or ex interfaces.


Be very careful what version of JunOS you use with AE and CoS. We  
discovered a software bug in 9.3 on the M10i platform where BA  
classifiers were not working on AE bundles. In our case, the packets  
were marked correctly but the classifier was simply throwing  
everything into the best-effort forwarding-class. The workaround was  
to configure a MF classifier until the bug could be resolved. Just be  
sure to TEST the config on a bench with proper hardware before  
deployment. Be sure to check egress forwarding-class on the non-AE  
interfaces to make sure your classifiers are working.

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] XNM Reverse DNS lookup

2010-05-07 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Thomas Eichhorn wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I currently run into the next problem with xnm, maybe
 you have an idea:
 
 If I do a login via xnm, the login takes about 30 secs - which is a
 little bit long.
 
 My idea behind this is, that the router tries to do a reverse lookup
 of the connecting ip.
 
 This fails/runs into an timeout because the router uses the nearest-by
 nameserver, but the xnm connect comes from a RFC1918 IP on the
 management interface - the nameserver usually don't know about
 this and tries to resolve it - up to a timeout.
 
 Do you have any idea howto disable reverse lookups on the router?

set system static-host-mapping xnm-hostname inet rfc1918 address ? 
 
 I have no problem to do it globally - but I do not want to remove
 the nameservers completely..
 
 Thanks for you help,
 Tom
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] MS-DPC Licensing (CLI)

2010-05-07 Thread Judah Scott
Does anyone know how to show licensing info (through cli specifically
for MS-DPC) or know of a doc specifically related to MS-DPC for MX
series (again, cli, not marketing)?  I can't find any cli command to
confirm we have the licenses required, nor do I see any error messages
saying that there is a licensing issue.  Does MS-DPC hook into 'show
system license' ?

Additionally, configuring services has proved to be cumbersome.  Does
anyone know of a guide or two relating to this besides Services
Interfaces Configuration Guide.  Something with a working explained
config would be nice ...


-J Scott
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Multicast Streaming Simulation

2010-05-07 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Hi Experts

Is it possible to generate multicast streaming (simulation) from my router to 
verify multicast configuration? If no, is their any other easy way? 

Best Regards,
Walaa Abdel Razzak


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] JUNOS 10.1 on EX

2010-05-07 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hello everyone,

Anyone run any EX3200/4200 boxes with 10.1 yet?  How good/bad is it?
10.1R1 is a lot of ones :)

Need to police some CCCs, and it looks like I need 10.1 for that.
Got it running on two lab switches and no major disasters yet...

Thanks,
Ross

-- 
Ross Vandegrift
r...@kallisti.us

If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter.  If the going gets tough,
the songs get tougher.
--Woody Guthrie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] SRX vs. SSG

2010-05-07 Thread Eric Helm
Hi,

Has anyone heard what Juniper's plan is moving forward with the SSG
platform? The SSG still has a much better feature set than the SRX, but
is seems that marketing is pushing people to the SRX. I am looking to
roll-out of approximately 200-300 VPN tunnels and trying to decide what
platform to go with between the two. SSG is more appealing because of
some of its feature set and proven stability. I just don't want to be
buying equipment that is slated to be phased out sometime in the future.

Thanks in advance,

/Eric
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] 10.0R3 VSTP on EXs...

2010-05-07 Thread Derick Winkworth
Anyone find that making a physical loop with two or more EXs automatically 
results in a forwarding loop when you use VSTP?  

We are seeing this right now...  I wonder if it affects the MX too.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Multicast Streaming Simulation

2010-05-07 Thread Tomasz Opala
Hi Walaa,

try VideoLAN - free streaming application.

Regards,
Tomasz

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sawrote:

 Hi Experts

 Is it possible to generate multicast streaming (simulation) from my router
 to verify multicast configuration? If no, is their any other easy way?

 Best Regards,
 Walaa Abdel Razzak


 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.1 on EX

2010-05-07 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:35:15PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
 Anyone run any EX3200/4200 boxes with 10.1 yet?  How good/bad is it?
 10.1R1 is a lot of ones :)
 
 Need to police some CCCs, and it looks like I need 10.1 for that.
 Got it running on two lab switches and no major disasters yet...

Get 10.1S1.  There is an issue with SFID crashing on 10.1R1, which is 
supposed to be fixed in 10.1S1.

Otherwise, 10.1R1 has been fine for me with L2 features.  I don't have 
any CCC/MPLS configured though, nor any L3 features
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.1 on EX

2010-05-07 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:45:00PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
 On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:35:15PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
  Anyone run any EX3200/4200 boxes with 10.1 yet?  How good/bad is it?
  10.1R1 is a lot of ones :)
  
  Need to police some CCCs, and it looks like I need 10.1 for that.
  Got it running on two lab switches and no major disasters yet...
 
 Get 10.1S1.  There is an issue with SFID crashing on 10.1R1, which is 
 supposed to be fixed in 10.1S1.
 
 Otherwise, 10.1R1 has been fine for me with L2 features.  I don't have 
 any CCC/MPLS configured though, nor any L3 features

Get 10.1R2 (which was due out a couple days ago), we hit a bug in 10.1S1
on EX8200 where FPCs crashed when updating a prefix-list that was
referenced in a firewall filter that is fixed in 10.1R2.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net   http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs. SSG

2010-05-07 Thread Chris Burwell
A few months back when we were looking at the SSG  SRX we were told
that there were no Immediate plans to phase out the SSG. Juniper
projects their product lifelines about 18 months in advance, and at
that point the SSG was still in the picture (Note: I believe 18 months
was the number given, but I'm not 100% sure).

IMO it appears that Juniper is building up the SRX line to replace the
SSG line, particularly since the SSG is running ScreenOS.

- Chris

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Eric Helm helmw...@ruraltel.net wrote:
 Hi,

 Has anyone heard what Juniper's plan is moving forward with the SSG
 platform? The SSG still has a much better feature set than the SRX, but
 is seems that marketing is pushing people to the SRX. I am looking to
 roll-out of approximately 200-300 VPN tunnels and trying to decide what
 platform to go with between the two. SSG is more appealing because of
 some of its feature set and proven stability. I just don't want to be
 buying equipment that is slated to be phased out sometime in the future.

 Thanks in advance,

 /Eric
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp