[j-nsp] Juniper QoS (LLQ)
Hi, Can anyone lend a hand with a sample configuration of QoS on Juniper? I am trying to have something really close to an existing Cisco deployment of LLQ with 1 PQ for VoIP and routing protocols (OSPF/IS-IS, BGP, LDP, RSVP), 3 CBWFQ classes (OAM, Services, IPSec VPNs) and a default class with everything that was not included in the previous classes. Thanks in advance, Vlad ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match
Hi Experts I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on subnets as it's not fixed range. I need somethins like QPPB in Cisco, Any Ideas? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match
Scu dcu.Search for those terms.. should return what you are looking for... On Jan 31, 2011 12:19 PM, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sa wrote: Hi Experts I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on subnets as it's not fixed range. I need somethins like QPPB in Cisco, Any Ideas? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match
No it's hyprid. -Original Message- From: Amos Rosenboim [mailto:a...@oasis-tech.net] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:05 PM To: Walaa Abdel razzak Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match If the network is Juniper end to end you can evaluate flow spec. Regards, Amos Sent from my iPhone On 31 Jan 2011, at 19:17, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sa wrote: Hi Experts I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on subnets as it's not fixed range. I need somethins like QPPB in Cisco, Any Ideas? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match
If the network is Juniper end to end you can evaluate flow spec. Regards, Amos Sent from my iPhone On 31 Jan 2011, at 19:17, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sa wrote: Hi Experts I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on subnets as it's not fixed range. I need somethins like QPPB in Cisco, Any Ideas? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match
Hello Friend, I agree with Chris, in any network environment that you have and are using the QPPB of Cisco. For interoperability with equipments Juniper, you need to use the configuration of SCU/DCU from JunOS, they are arrays of policies where you can select some parameters of BGP and applied to specific traffic-class or queue of CoS. I'm attaching some examples that you can see and try to replicated your policies of QPPB. And this links is about SCU/DCU: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-network-mgm/source-class-usage-options-junos-nm.html Best regards, David. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sawrote: No it's hyprid. -Original Message- From: Amos Rosenboim [mailto:a...@oasis-tech.net] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:05 PM To: Walaa Abdel razzak Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match If the network is Juniper end to end you can evaluate flow spec. Regards, Amos Sent from my iPhone On 31 Jan 2011, at 19:17, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sa wrote: Hi Experts I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on subnets as it's not fixed range. I need somethins like QPPB in Cisco, Any Ideas? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] ex8200 errors - sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric request time out
Hi all, I'm seeing these messages spewing from one of our ex8208s -- (FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric request time out for plane 2 dest 1 pfe 1 (FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric request time out for plane 2 dest 4 pfe 1 (FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric request time out for plane 2 dest 5 pfe 1 (FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric request time out for plane 2 dest 65 pfe 1 It's always in this sequence (dest 1, 4, 5, 65) and the sequence is repeated constantly -- ~15-20 messages per second. Anyone seen this before? We're working through it with the JTAC but it's slow-going (our fault) and I hoped someone else might've been there, done that. ex8208, JUNOS 10.0S1. Cheers, Dale ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Creating L2tp/ADSL over M10i
Hi Expertise
I'm going to move ADSL customers from cisco to Juniper M10i router and
let is working as LNS, I’m installing (Multiservice 100) to support the
tunneling and PPP sessions over it.
I created the configurations and need any one made this service before to
review it.
interfaces {
sp-0/2/0 {
description L2TP-STS-VIRTUAL-INTERFACE;
unit 0 {
family inet;
}
unit 2295 {
dial-options {
l2tp-interface-id ADSL-XXX;
shared;
}
family inet;
}
}
lo0 {
unit 0 {
address X.X.X.X/32;
}
}
}
access {
radius-server {
Y.Y.Y.Y {
port 1812;
accounting-port 1813;
secret $9$hlPceMX7V2oGN-Hq.fzFO1RSlM; ## SECRET-DATA
source-address X.X.X.X;
}
}
profile ADSL-CUSTOMERS {
authentication-order radius;
}
profile ADSL-XXX-TUNNEL {
client PRODUCTION-TUNNEL {
l2tp {
interface-id ADSL-XXX;
lcp-renegotiation;
ppp-authentication pap;
}
}
}
}
services {
l2tp {
tunnel-group VPDN-GROUP {
l2tp-access-profile ADSL-XXX-TUNNEL;
ppp-access-profile ADSL-CUSTOMERS;
local-gateway {
address X.X.X.X;
}
service-interface sp-0/2/0;
}
traceoptions {
file ADSL-TRACE;
flag all;
debug-level error;
}
}
}
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Ethernet Rings - ERPS - ITU G.8032
Hi Everybody, Does anybody know if/when the EX Series will support this standard? http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/example/layer-2-ethernet-oam-ring-protection-example-mx-solutions.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_Ring_Protection_Switching If it will not happen, or will not happen soon. Then what are others using to build redundant Rings on EX Series. MST just doesn't really work the MPLS features seem so limited that everything has to be manually configured. We have a Metro ring, which will soon have 20 Nodes 400M Ceragon links from Node to Node. The Ceragon switch features do support G. 8032, but I would prefer doing this on really routing/switching gear. cheers /rolf ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] selective NATing
We have a m120 running 10.0R4.7 which is being used as an edge-router for
our group. It has a single link connected to the campus backbone
which is its path to off-campus nets. There are multiple leaf subnets
behind this m120.
Our campus IT group has picked a rfc1918 net to be used as a campus-scope
net (172.30/16) and I have been allocated a subset of that space.
I would like to configure selective NATing on a given subnet.
IE for local subnet 172.30.70/24 if the destination is a campus address
don't translate, if it's an off-campus address then NAT it to a routeable
address.
I tried setting up a routing instance and next-hop-service nat but
couldn't make it work.
Can somebody please point me at relevant documentation or some examples.
Thanks.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.eduCollege of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_adminIowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include std_disclaimer.h
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
