[j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

2011-03-01 Thread Patrik Lagerman
Can I run a full BGP table on the M20 with a RE2 with 768MB memory?

Full IPv4 and IPv6 table.

/Patrik

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread Scott T. Cameron
You could use gdb.  But the likelihood of any success without source code is
slim.

You're better off sending them to jtac.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:36 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Hello community,

 Is there any tool to debug vmcore files generated on an m-series juniper
 router ?


 Thanks.



 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread meryem Z

You mean kgdb i guess. this tool is available on juniper routers on /var/bin.
I'm wondering if anyone has tested it before ?


Thank you.





 From: routeh...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:21:58 -0500
 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files
 
 You could use gdb.  But the likelihood of any success without source code is
 slim.
 
 You're better off sending them to jtac.
 
 On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:36 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 
  Hello community,
 
  Is there any tool to debug vmcore files generated on an m-series juniper
  router ?
 
 
  Thanks.
 
 
 
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
  
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread Scott T. Cameron
Here's an example below.  You'll either need to use gdb on the box itself,
or get/xcompile a powerpc-freebsd gdb.

Again, without source, you're not going to get far.

% tar zvxf /var/tmp/chassisd.core-tarball.4.tgz
chassisd.core.4.gz
juniper.conf.gz
messages
chassisd.info.4
juniper.conf.1.gz
% gzip -d chassisd.core.4.gz
% gdb /usr/sbin/chassisd chassisd.core.4
GNU gdb 6.5 [juniper_2006a_411]
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as powerpc-specifix.com-freebsd...(no debugging
symbols found)

Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libjipc.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjipc.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libthr.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libisc.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libisc.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcmb.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcmb.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libm.so.4...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libm.so.4
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libprovider.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libprovider.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libiic.so.1...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libiic.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcam.so.3...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcam.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libutil.so.5...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libutil.so.5
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgcc.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgcc.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.6...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
Core was generated by `chassisd'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
[New Thread 0x2057000 (LWP 100110)]
(gdb) bt
#0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x421d8a30 in raise () from /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
#2  0x42681e88 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x01c00c64 in vlogging_event ()
#4  0x01c00af4 in vlogging ()
#5  0x01c00ce4 in logging ()
#6  0x01ab9670 in pic_clean_init ()
#7  0x01a16308 in mcontrol_check_backup_active ()
#8  0x01a16e20 in msm_exec ()
#9  0x01a17b2c in mcontrol_init ()
#10 0x019365e4 in ch_init ()
#11 0x01938640 in ch_a2_fru_map_set_context ()
#12 0x01ab3620 in allocadupx ()
#13 0x01ab44bc in main ()
(gdb) x 0x01a16308
0x1a16308 mcontrol_check_backup_active+364:   0x3d200201

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:

  You mean kgdb i guess. this tool is available on juniper routers on
 /var/bin.
 I'm wondering if anyone has tested it before ?


 Thank you.





  From: routeh...@gmail.com
  Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:21:58 -0500
  To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

 
  You could use gdb. But the likelihood of any success without source code
 is
  slim.
 
  You're better off sending them to jtac.
 
  On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:36 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
  
   Hello community,
  
   Is there any tool to debug vmcore files generated on an m-series
 juniper
   

Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread david.roy
Hi,

You can also use the cli command : show system core-dumps core-file-info detail 
core-filename

Regards,
David
 


 
David Roy
Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC
Tel.   +33(0)299876472
Mob. +33(0)685522213
Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com
JNCIE-M/T  #703 ; JNCIS-ENT

-Message d'origine-
De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Scott T. Cameron
Envoyé : mardi 1 mars 2011 15:02
À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Objet : Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

Here's an example below.  You'll either need to use gdb on the box itself, or 
get/xcompile a powerpc-freebsd gdb.

Again, without source, you're not going to get far.

% tar zvxf /var/tmp/chassisd.core-tarball.4.tgz
chassisd.core.4.gz
juniper.conf.gz
messages
chassisd.info.4
juniper.conf.1.gz
% gzip -d chassisd.core.4.gz
% gdb /usr/sbin/chassisd chassisd.core.4 GNU gdb 6.5 [juniper_2006a_411] 
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are 
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as powerpc-specifix.com-freebsd...(no debugging 
symbols found)

Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libjipc.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjipc.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libthr.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libisc.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libisc.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libcmb.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcmb.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libm.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libm.so.4
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libprovider.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libprovider.so.1 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libiic.so.1...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libiic.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcam.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcam.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libutil.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libutil.so.5 Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libgcc.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgcc.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.6...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 Core was generated by `chassisd'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 [New Thread 0x2057000 (LWP 
100110)]
(gdb) bt
#0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x421d8a30 in raise () from /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
#2  0x42681e88 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x01c00c64 in vlogging_event ()
#4  0x01c00af4 in vlogging ()
#5  0x01c00ce4 in logging ()
#6  0x01ab9670 in pic_clean_init ()
#7  0x01a16308 in mcontrol_check_backup_active ()
#8  0x01a16e20 in msm_exec ()
#9  0x01a17b2c in mcontrol_init ()
#10 0x019365e4 in ch_init ()
#11 0x01938640 in ch_a2_fru_map_set_context ()
#12 0x01ab3620 in allocadupx ()
#13 0x01ab44bc in main ()
(gdb) x 0x01a16308
0x1a16308 mcontrol_check_backup_active+364:   0x3d200201

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:

  You mean kgdb i guess. this tool is available on 

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] P2MP LSPs :: TailEnd/Bud nodes behavior

2011-03-01 Thread Phil Bedard
I'm not sure about the MX80 but on the MX960 with a DPC you can dedicate a
PFE on one of the DPCs to be used for tunnel services, but you lose the
Ethernet interfaces.  I believe on the newer MPCs you can do the same and
not lose the Ethernet interfaces.  Not sure about support on the MX80
though you'd have to check with Juniper.

Phil 

On 3/1/11 2:50 AM, Egor Zimin les...@gmail.com wrote:

In my case I have a deal with MX80

2011/3/1 Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com:
 In the Juniper case you can get around the double replication on the M/T
 by using a tunnel services PIC and using a tunnel interface to terminate
 the P2MP LSP.   Just a limitation of the platforms.

 Phil

 On 2/28/11 10:44 AM, Egor Zimin les...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello, guys

Today I noticed very interesting difference in implementation of P2MP
LSPs by Cisco and Juniper.
The difference is related to explicit/implicit-null behavior of S2L
Sub-LSP tailend routers:
Cisco implementation:
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_te_p2mp
_p
s6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html)
---
The tailend routers allocate unreserved labels, which are greater than
15 and do not include implicit or explicit null labels.
---

In Juniper's implementation tailend allocates implicit/explicit null
label as a usual.
As a consequence of this, (it looks like) we can have unnecessary
replication before Bud nodes.

For example:
Let's consider this configuration:
###
label-switched-path LSP-P2MP-16--19 {
to 10.245.87.19;
p2mp TREE1;
}
label-switched-path LSP-P2MP-16--18 {
to 10.245.87.18;
p2mp TREE1;
}
label-switched-path LSP-P2MP-16--15 {
to 10.245.87.15;
p2mp TREE1;
}
label-switched-path LSP-P2MP-16--17 {
to 10.245.87.17;
p2mp TREE1;
}
###
 show mpls lsp p2mp ingress
Ingress LSP: 1 sessions
P2MP name: TREE1, P2MP branch count: 4
To  FromState Rt P ActivePath   LSPname
10.245.87.1710.245.87.16Up 0 *
LSP-P2MP-16--17
10.245.87.1510.245.87.16Up 0 *
LSP-P2MP-16--15
10.245.87.1810.245.87.16Up 0 *
LSP-P2MP-16--18
10.245.87.1910.245.87.16Up 0 *
LSP-P2MP-16--19
Total 4 displayed, Up 4, Down 0
###
As you can see, there are four leaves. Three bottom leaves use the
same downstream interface:
###
 show rsvp session p2mp detail | match PATH sentto
  PATH sentto: 10.245.87.146 (xe-0/0/2.0) 4 pkts
  PATH sentto: 10.245.87.149 (xe-0/0/1.0) 2 pkts
  PATH sentto: 10.245.87.149 (xe-0/0/1.0) 2 pkts
  PATH sentto: 10.245.87.149 (xe-0/0/1.0) 3 pkts
###
 show rsvp session p2mp
Ingress RSVP: 18 sessions
P2MP name: TREE1, P2MP branch count: 4
To  FromState   Rt Style Labelin Labelout
LSPname
10.245.87.1710.245.87.16Up   0  1 SE   -3
LSP-P2MP-16--17
10.245.87.1510.245.87.16Up   0  1 SE   -3
LSP-P2MP-16--15
10.245.87.1810.245.87.16Up   0  1 SE   -   309200
LSP-P2MP-16--18
10.245.87.1910.245.87.16Up   0  1 SE   -   309200
LSP-P2MP-16--19
Total 4 displayed, Up 4, Down 0
###

As you can see, we have two different out labels (3 and 309200) for
the same P2MP LSP. Label 3 is allocated by node 10.245.87.15 because
of PHP.

Can anybody explain, what IETF speaks about this case ? Must tailend
routers allocate unreserved label or not ? I can't find any mention of
this case in RFCs (4875, 4461).

--
Best regards,
Egor Zimin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/






-- 
Best regards,
Egor Zimin


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

2011-03-01 Thread Michael Loftis
It actually depends on other factors than just the RE. The SSB may not have
enough memory depending on number of neighbors and ports.



Sent from my Motorola Xoom
On Mar 1, 2011 4:12 AM, Patrik Lagerman p...@connect2ip.se wrote:
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

2011-03-01 Thread Patrik Lagerman
What is max on SSB-E with 128MB mem?

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:46:17 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote
 It actually depends on other factors than just the RE. The SSB may not have 
 enough memory depending on number of neighbors and ports.
 
 Sent from my Motorola Xoom
 On Mar 1, 2011 4:12 AM, Patrik Lagerman p...@connect2ip.se wrote:

 
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread meryem Z

It is a good idea.
one more question plz: Is it safe to read a vmcore file of a router on another 
router ? since the first one crashed recently and any command with a lot of 
output makes him stop responding.


Thanks again for your help.

 From: david@orange-ftgroup.com
 To: routeh...@gmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:18:28 +0100
 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files
 
 Hi,
 
 You can also use the cli command : show system core-dumps core-file-info 
 detail core-filename
 
 Regards,
 David
  
 
 
  
 David Roy
 Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC
 Tel.   +33(0)299876472
 Mob. +33(0)685522213
 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com
 JNCIE-M/T  #703 ; JNCIS-ENT
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
 [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Scott T. Cameron
 Envoyé : mardi 1 mars 2011 15:02
 À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Objet : Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files
 
 Here's an example below.  You'll either need to use gdb on the box itself, or 
 get/xcompile a powerpc-freebsd gdb.
 
 Again, without source, you're not going to get far.
 
 % tar zvxf /var/tmp/chassisd.core-tarball.4.tgz
 chassisd.core.4.gz
 juniper.conf.gz
 messages
 chassisd.info.4
 juniper.conf.1.gz
 % gzip -d chassisd.core.4.gz
 % gdb /usr/sbin/chassisd chassisd.core.4 GNU gdb 6.5 [juniper_2006a_411] 
 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are 
 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
 Type show copying to see the conditions.
 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
 This GDB was configured as powerpc-specifix.com-freebsd...(no debugging 
 symbols found)
 
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libddl-access.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libjipc.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjipc.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libberkeley-db.so.4 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libthr.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libisc.so.2...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libisc.so.2
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3...
 (no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libkvm.so.3
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfasic.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libhsl2.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libcmb.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcmb.so.1
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcnh.so.1
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1...
 (no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjpci.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libm.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libm.so.4
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric2.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfabric1.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libprovider.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libprovider.so.1 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libiic.so.1...
 (no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libiic.so.1
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcam.so.3...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcam.so.3
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsbuf.so.3 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libutil.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libutil.so.5 Reading symbols from 
 /usr/lib/libgcc.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgcc.so.1
 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.6...
 (no debugging symbols found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.6
 Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
 found)...done.
 Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 Core was generated by `chassisd'.
 Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
 #0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 [New Thread 0x2057000 (LWP 
 100110)]
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0x42683428 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
 #1  0x421d8a30 in raise () from /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
 #2  0x42681e88 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
 #3  0x01c00c64 in vlogging_event ()
 #4  0x01c00af4 in 

Re: [j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

2011-03-01 Thread Keegan Holley
It's possible, but there are alot of other factors, number of peers,
forwarding table size, L3VPN/L2VPN or no, etc.  On the surface it sounds
like a bad idea though. Especially since the M20 is EOL and doesn't have the
resources to support newer code versions.



On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Patrik Lagerman p...@connect2ip.se wrote:

 Can I run a full BGP table on the M20 with a RE2 with 768MB memory?

 Full IPv4 and IPv6 table.

 /Patrik

 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

2011-03-01 Thread Dan Spataro
I know of one doing this.  I would not recommend it in a production environment.


DRAM   768 MB
Memory utilization  95 percent
CPU utilization:
User   2 percent
Background 2 percent
Kernel 5 percent
Interrupt  0 percent
Idle  91 percent
Model  RE-2.0




-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Patrik Lagerman
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:47 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] M20 / RE2 Full table

Can I run a full BGP table on the M20 with a RE2 with 768MB memory?

Full IPv4 and IPv6 table.

/Patrik

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:21:58AM -0500, Scott T. Cameron wrote:
 You could use gdb.  But the likelihood of any success without source 
 code is slim.

You'd be absolutely amazed how much JTAC stupidity can be avoided by 
looking at the coredump backtrace yourself, without needing source 
access. As I understand it they use some point and click tool for 
automatically identifying PRs which match a coredump, and in my 
experience their tool is on crack a VERY high percentage of the time. 
Being able to say uh no, that's not even close to what I see in the 
backtrace, please try again can literally cut months off the time it 
takes for a case to be resolved.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net   http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] 10.2R4

2011-03-01 Thread Bill Blackford
http://www.juniper.net/alerts/viewalert.jsp?txtAlertNumber=PSN-2010-12-112actionBtn=Search


Is 10.2R4 actually released? The latest I can find for download is
10.2R3.10. I must be missing something.


Thanks,

-b

-- 
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] 10.2R4

2011-03-01 Thread Aviva Garrett
Hi Bill,

No, it's not out yet.

Aviva

In message aanlktikesxjadsbwxdm-dxac0nsshdcj-+cyqkx39...@mail.gmail.comyou wr
ite:
 http://www.juniper.net/alerts/viewalert.jsp?txtAlertNumber=PSN-2010-12-112ac
   tionBtn=Search
 
 
 Is 10.2R4 actually released? The latest I can find for download is
 10.2R3.10. I must be missing something.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 -b
 
 -- 
 Bill Blackford
 Network Engineer
 
 Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp