[j-nsp] QoS EXP Rewrite Rule
Hi Expert, Could please, explain me what are the aim of the two below commands and where can we use them : - exp-push-push-push - exp-swap-push-push Do I need the below Commands in the Carrier's Carrier Solution, to rewrite the exp bits values ?Thanks in advance. BR/ Farhat. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] VC-port over Ethernet
Hi I would recommend Q-in-Q on the intermediate switch. I have seen 4550 VC spanning over metro erhernet, so this should work for 3300 also. Regards Klauzi — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Nick Kritsky nick.krit...@gmail.com wrote: Dear J-NSP, Can anyone confirm/deny if two EX3300 can form virtual-chassis when their vc-ports are connected via third switch? thanks nick ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Best route reflector platform
On Monday, February 25, 2013 04:56:39 PM Benny Amorsen wrote: Dedicating an MX routing engine to the task seems a bit silly, particularly since it would probably have to be an MX240 due to the limitations of the MX80 RE. A long-standing complaint of mine, for those who've seen most of my ranting about the same on this list. Mind you, I know several networks using M120's and MX240's/480's as route reflectors, simply because those are the smallest boxes with the largest memory for dedicated route reflection. I refuse to give in to that nonesense. On the Cisco side the answer is ASR1k, but it seems less clear-cut with Juniper. ASR1001 with 16GB DRAM. What more do you want, really? My only issue with Cisco route reflectors in a Juniper network (or vice versa) was the lack of compatibility in control plane l2vpn NLRI (where Juniper signals BGP NLRI for l2circuit-style (or l2vpn as it's known at Juniper) while Cisco is expecting VPLS-style, for a VPLS environment. I'm currently getting this confirmed as we're planning a major network upgrade, particularly for compatibility between both vendors re: MCAST-NLRI in NG-MVPN deployments (inet-mvpn as they call it at Juniper). Will report back if I find out anything interesting. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Best route reflector platform
On Monday, February 25, 2013 07:20:46 PM Phil Mayers wrote: This depends on routing table size; we manage with an M7i on RE-400, but we've only got ~14k routes in the RIB! The M7i/M10i does have a 4GB RE (RE-1800X1), but I never did get a chance to try it out. Besides, it might still be costly (albeit cheaper than the M120 which can only do 4GB as well anyway). There's also the fact that Juniper will likely cease support for the M7i/M10i at some point. So, YMMV. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] CoS Configuration
On 14/04/2013, at 1:32 PM, Giuliano Medalha giuli...@wztech.com.br wrote: Hi, Does anyone has some experience implementing CoS using Radius for MX Series with PPPoE License ? We are looking for a specific solution that: - Can allocate bandwidth of 1 Mbps for a subscriber user (PPPoE dynamic interface) for the first 1MB. - After the first 1MB we will need to reduce the bandwidth for 512 kbps. Witch mechanism or configuration we could use to do something similar to that ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp Hi Giuliano, Juniper's SRC platform will do this but if you just want something simple, standard RADIUS CoA on the MX will let you change CoS filters on the fly. You would simply trigger the CoA based on external events (such as accounting db information). To shape someone after only 1MB would mean that your accounting interval would have to be pretty short though. Cheers, Ben ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
