Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit (martini) vlan-mismatch

2013-09-19 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-09-19 10:09 +0300), Saku Ytti wrote:

 Now consider in B-END if some of the SVLANs need to go to the L2VPN circuit 
 and
 some SVLAN needs to be locally terminated.

s/SVLAN/CVLAN/g

sorry about that

-- 
  ++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Steel-Belted RADIUS backups

2013-09-19 Thread Terebizh, Evgeny
Hi there,
You might consider using RAID mirroring if your servers support it :)

/ET




On 8/30/13 12:42 PM, Jed Laundry jlaun...@jlaundry.com wrote:

If it's Linux, are you using LVM as a storage layer?

LVM snapshots are your friend for making a consistent backup, regardless
of
if you use a tar script or VM snapshot/image.

Thanks,
Jed.

Sent from a mobile device.
On 29/08/2013 11:12 pm, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 Does anyone out there use SBR?

 We have the Global Enterprise Edition (GEE) version v6.1.7 running on
 Linux.

 I'm putting something in place to back up SBR itself; currently we
 just tar up /opt/JNPRsbr/radius (after stopping sbrd) but it's
 occurred to me that we have never tested a recovery using this method.

 JTAC are telling me there is no automated way to perform the XML
 export function normally performed in the GUI. The product docs don't
 make it clear whether taking a copy of everything in
 /opt/JNPRsbr/radius/ is enough, or whether the XML export is also
 required.

 Looking at what the supplied install/upgrade scripts do, it's just a
 recursive 'cp' with some unnecessary folders excluded.

 We also take backups of the VM guest that's running SBR but I'm not
 familiar enough with SBR's back-end databases to know whether that
 results in a recoverable data set; there'll be open files for sure
 (hence the stop;tar;start method described above).

 What do you do?  use FreeRADIUS instead is a valid but unwelcome
 response :-))

 Cheers,
 Dale
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

2013-09-19 Thread Per Granath
The new MS-MIC is coming too...

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/concept/ms-mic-and-mpc-overview.html

So, it fits in MPC1/MPC2, if you have a free MIC slot.
It costs a lot less than the MS-DPC, although it has about the same capacity.

Fits in the back of MX80 too...


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Tomasz Mikolajek
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:13 PM
To: rkramer
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

Hi.
Now we are testing Juniper device do CGNAT. MX240 with MS-DPC card.
Everything work fine. I heard that in new year will be shipped new service 
card. Can any one say more about new MS-DPC?


2013/9/18 rkramer rkra...@gmail.com

 I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment today, and 
 I'm looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes, which are Cisco ASR's.  
 They are running out of horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's 
 on MX's provide more than enough capacity...  I'm not planning to do 
 any firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat pools and 1:1 nat 
 translations, with some 6to4 thrown in for good measure.


 Anyway, I'm assuming someone on the list has to be running MX's doing NAT?
 How is it working out for you?  Any pitfalls?


 Ryan Kramer
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit (martini) vlan-mismatch

2013-09-19 Thread Alex Arseniev


- Original Message - 
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi

To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Everything works just fine. Only I find it really strange B-END cannot 
push
arbitrary S-VLAN, considering A-END is going to change it anyhow. If it's 
not

101, A-END vill be down with 'vlan-mismatch'.



Use explicit encapsulation-type ethernet under [protocols l2circuit 
interface  ] and You won't be seeing this mismatch.

On both sides of course.
HTH
Thanks
Alex 


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] ICMP Type - IP Unreachable Notification

2013-09-19 Thread Harri Makela
Hi All

I have following ICMP type (ip unreachable notification) and I want to know if 
our MX/J series routers responds to this ICMP type or not. i.e. I have checked 
for another ICMP type  ip mask reply with following command and I don`t get 
anything response back which means JUNOS doesn`t reply for mask request.


sudo nping -icmp --icmp-type mask-request x.x.x.x --count 5


x.x.x.x is our internet facing IP address. 


I am looking for something similar which I can try to get the behavior of 
JUNOS. I know if we want to block this type of ICMP , then we have to apply a 
filter which I really don`t want at the moment.

Thanks in adavance !!
Eddie
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Steel-Belted RADIUS backups

2013-09-19 Thread Michael Loftis
On Aug 30, 2013 1:46 AM, Jed Laundry jlaun...@jlaundry.com wrote:

 If it's Linux, are you using LVM as a storage layer?

 LVM snapshots are your friend for making a consistent backup, regardless
of
 if you use a tar script or VM snapshot/image.

Unless developers have made major structural changes to LVM snapshots
they're nearly useless. They require large swaths of contiguous kernel RAM
for the CoW bitmap so once a machine is running for a while and thus has
fragmented its RAM free space you end up with LVM bailing out while trying
to snapshot.  The other side of that is if your snapshot routine doesn't
shutdown services and unmount the filesystem you're essentially
snapshotting a crashed server and hoping filesystem and database recovery
goes well when you restore that backup


 Thanks,
 Jed.

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] MX104 Power Draw (AC)

2013-09-19 Thread Paul Stewart
Does anyone have an MX104 deployed with dual AC power supplies and using the
4X10G built-in that could give me an idea of how much amperage (AC 110v) it
draws?

I can pull up the specs on it but looking for a reasonable estimate on
amperage draw, hopefully based on real world.

Many thanks,

Paul




___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Automation of EX code upgrade

2013-09-19 Thread Morgan McLean
Unix expect script? SSH keys can make scp'ing files and logging in to run
commands pretty painless.

Good luck!

Morgan


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Mick Burns bmx1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey all,

 I am looking for ideas/previous experience in the best way to automate the
 upgrade of multiple (let's say about a hundred units) EX switches in large
 datacenters.  Let's assume here they are a mix of 3200 and 4200 and all of
 them runs the same JunOS release.  Any failure must be quickly identified
 for a manual upgrade.

 Any help or advice is much appreciated.
 Mick B.
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




-- 
Thanks,
Morgan
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Automation of EX code upgrade

2013-09-19 Thread Ben Dale
If you're talking green fields (out-of-the-box) then there are a couple of ways 
depending on the current Junos release the switch is running:

12.2 - Automatic Software Download

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/ex-series-software-automatic-download-upgrading.html

=12.2 - Zero Touch Provisioning

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/concept/software-image-and-configuration-automatic-provisioning-understanding.html

Try to stagger upgrades if you can, or learn the effects of having a hundred 
switches hitting a TFTP server for a ~110MB image file.  Neither of these 
methods will display the success of the upgrades though.

If your switches are already deployed, then a better way to do it is with Junos 
Space.  

The nice thing about the Space method is that you can upgrade smaller groups of 
switches at a time, pre-stage the images up to each switch and schedule the 
entire process.  Each upgrade is given a Job ID and that Job ID will return 
success or failure depending on the outcome, even in the pre-staging if you 
don't have room on your flash for the image..

This functionality is built into the base Space platform too, which you can 
download and install with a 60(?)-day trial license.

Cheers,

Ben

On 20/09/2013, at 8:04 AM, Mick Burns bmx1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey all,
 
 I am looking for ideas/previous experience in the best way to automate the
 upgrade of multiple (let's say about a hundred units) EX switches in large
 datacenters.  Let's assume here they are a mix of 3200 and 4200 and all of
 them runs the same JunOS release.  Any failure must be quickly identified
 for a manual upgrade.
 
 Any help or advice is much appreciated.
 Mick B.
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Automation of EX code upgrade

2013-09-19 Thread Mick Burns
Hey all,

I am looking for ideas/previous experience in the best way to automate the
upgrade of multiple (let's say about a hundred units) EX switches in large
datacenters.  Let's assume here they are a mix of 3200 and 4200 and all of
them runs the same JunOS release.  Any failure must be quickly identified
for a manual upgrade.

Any help or advice is much appreciated.
Mick B.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Automation of EX code upgrade

2013-09-19 Thread Georgios Vlachos

Junos Space (VM version) is pretty inexpensive as well for required
functionality using the built in application Network Management Platform. 

Thanks,
George

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Ben Dale
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:33 AM
To: Mick Burns
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Automation of EX code upgrade

If you're talking green fields (out-of-the-box) then there are a couple of
ways depending on the current Junos release the switch is running:

12.2 - Automatic Software Download

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/ex-ser
ies-software-automatic-download-upgrading.html

=12.2 - Zero Touch Provisioning

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/concept/software-imag
e-and-configuration-automatic-provisioning-understanding.html

Try to stagger upgrades if you can, or learn the effects of having a hundred
switches hitting a TFTP server for a ~110MB image file.  Neither of these
methods will display the success of the upgrades though.

If your switches are already deployed, then a better way to do it is with
Junos Space.  

The nice thing about the Space method is that you can upgrade smaller groups
of switches at a time, pre-stage the images up to each switch and schedule
the entire process.  Each upgrade is given a Job ID and that Job ID will
return success or failure depending on the outcome, even in the pre-staging
if you don't have room on your flash for the image..

This functionality is built into the base Space platform too, which you can
download and install with a 60(?)-day trial license.

Cheers,

Ben

On 20/09/2013, at 8:04 AM, Mick Burns bmx1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey all,
 
 I am looking for ideas/previous experience in the best way to automate the
 upgrade of multiple (let's say about a hundred units) EX switches in large
 datacenters.  Let's assume here they are a mix of 3200 and 4200 and all of
 them runs the same JunOS release.  Any failure must be quickly identified
 for a manual upgrade.
 
 Any help or advice is much appreciated.
 Mick B.
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp