[j-nsp] SRX240H-POE and SRX240H (non poe) cluster
Hi folks, Is it possible to configure chassis cluster between srx240h-poe and srx240h models? I know, that in chassis cluster scenario all hardware and software should be identical (also card placement), but still, at this moment, no other hardware is available. Is it possible ? Thanks, Misha ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] OSPF question
Which can be the reason why among two MX (using irb) running OSPF there are around 100-150 OSPF Link State Update Packet retransmission per day ? No link is interrupted, no link is fauly/CRC... My customer is receiving traps on its monitoring systems and I've no clear clue about the reason... Any reccomendation/experience ? Thank you ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Feature difference between latest Junos 12 and 13
Found it: http://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/compare-softwares.html?swName=Junos+OStyp=1#bm=cmpswpl=MX80rel1=13.3R2rel2=12.3R6 Sent from my iPad 2 On 31 May 2014, at 19:26, Gavin Henry ghe...@suretec.co.uk wrote: Hi all, I can only find the release notes between point releases on each version. Anyone found a link covering this? We're on latest recommended right now on our mx80's and are happy but wanted to see what we're missing. Thanks. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] OSPF question
On 5 Jun 2014, at 2:35 am, R S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote: Which can be the reason why among two MX (using irb) running OSPF there are around 100-150 OSPF Link State Update Packet retransmission per day ? No link is interrupted, no link is fauly/CRC... My customer is receiving traps on its monitoring systems and I've no clear clue about the reason... Any reccomendation/experience ? OSPF does a complete database update every 30 minutes with default settings. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Small P Router Recommendations
Hi guys! I'm a Juniper fan too, but I'll take a non-Juniper answer today. Seems to be an MPLS heavily oriented list, so I figured you guys would know. I'm sure we'd all love an EX3200 take could run LDP, pack more than 1 label and do it over aggregated interfaces. Is anyone else making a box that can do that? Need to aggregate a bunch of SRXs, and drag it back to the office. I was thinking, would there be any ill-effects to building a larger subnet and connecting all the SRXes together with a standard L2 switch, and then have the switch uplink to the closest P router? Sure would be nice for adding more boxes in the future, no need to touch the P. Oh, and have they got L3VPN/VPLS figured out on the ACX yet? Thanks! Geoff Crawford Central Office In-Charge Direct : 250 627 0943 Fax : 250 627 0904 www.citywest.ca The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from your computer. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Small P Router Recommendations
On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:00 pm, Geoff Crawford geoff.crawf...@cwct.ca wrote: Hi guys! I'm a Juniper fan too, but I'll take a non-Juniper answer today. Seems to be an MPLS heavily oriented list, so I figured you guys would know. I'm sure we'd all love an EX3200 take could run LDP, pack more than 1 label and do it over aggregated interfaces. Is anyone else making a box that can do that? If you're after a switch that'll do MPLS/L3VPN, check out the QFX5100. All 10/40G though which might not be what you're after. Need to aggregate a bunch of SRXs, and drag it back to the office. I was thinking, would there be any ill-effects to building a larger subnet and connecting all the SRXes together with a standard L2 switch, and then have the switch uplink to the closest P router? Sure would be nice for adding more boxes in the future, no need to touch the P. Why not just run another SRX as a PE and aggregate via that? The MPLS feature-set is pretty comprehensive - L2VPN, VPLS, L3VPN, L2Circuit etc. Oh, and have they got L3VPN/VPLS figured out on the ACX yet? L3VPN works just fine, but L2 services are coming soon. Ben ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] OSPF question
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote: On 5 Jun 2014, at 2:35 am, R S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote: Which can be the reason why among two MX (using irb) running OSPF there are around 100-150 OSPF Link State Update Packet retransmission per day ? No link is interrupted, no link is fauly/CRC... My customer is receiving traps on its monitoring systems and I've no clear clue about the reason... Any reccomendation/experience ? OSPF does a complete database update every 30 minutes with default settings. This should not trigger the OSPF LSU Retransmit trap. Traps are only triggered by error events (which sometimes aren't really an error). In previous experiences, I've seen devices that won't respond to packets sent to the multicast address. When an LSU retransmit occurs, that LSU is sent unicast to the peer, at which point it's acknowledged. This has the effect that you get the trap every 30 minutes or so, coinciding with the 30 minute update timer. The 30 minute update timer doesn't cause it, though. In addition to the above, I would perform tcpdumps on the MX that does not acknowledge the LSU and see if it receives the LSU when its sent via multicast and see if it responds to it or not. --tc ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- *Tyler Christiansen | Technical Operations* tyler http://adap.tv/@adap.tv http://adap.tv/ | www.adap.tv *m :* 864.346.4095 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Small P Router Recommendations
On Thursday, June 05, 2014 04:00:39 AM Geoff Crawford wrote: I'm sure we'd all love an EX3200 take could run LDP, pack more than 1 label and do it over aggregated interfaces. Is anyone else making a box that can do that? The Cisco ME3600X is a 1U Metro-E switch with full IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS capabilities. Your limitations will be 10Gbps ports (it only has two, but has 24x Gig-E ports) and a its small FIB. But if you only have a handful of routes (under 30,000, I think), it'll do the job just fine. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
