[j-nsp] Refurbished
Hi! I'm thinking of bying refurshed mx-routers, the bandwidth will be around 5-10Gbps and able to cary 3-4 full tables. is the following good RE/linecards? RE-S-2000-4096 DPC-R-4XGE-XFP DPC-R-40GE-SFP is for example RE-S-2000-4096 still upgradable with recent Junos software? Regards Johan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Refurbished
Should be able to handle the tables ok. The RE will not support 64 bit though. When 32 disappears is when you will have issues. As long as DPC are the only line cards should work well. I am reluctant to mix with MPC in a single chassis. On Oct 20, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Johan Borch johan.bo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm thinking of bying refurshed mx-routers, the bandwidth will be around 5-10Gbps and able to cary 3-4 full tables. is the following good RE/linecards? RE-S-2000-4096 DPC-R-4XGE-XFP DPC-R-40GE-SFP is for example RE-S-2000-4096 still upgradable with recent Junos software? Regards Johan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Spanning tree RJ45 SFP on QFX5100
Dear all, we are not done debugging yet, but as of right now, we are having a rather strange effect... Our setup looks as follows: QFX5100 = CStest sw1 = 2960g sw2 = 2960g sw3 = EX3300 sw4 = 2960g sw5 = 2960S CStest RJ45 1G sw1 CStest SM 1G sw2 CStest SM 10G sw3 CStest RJ45 1G sw4 CStest SM 1G sw5 The effect we're seeing is that Spanning Tree works just fine over the Single Mode links, but not across the RJ45 SFPs. Weirdly enough, LLDP and the like are being transmitted just fine. Yes, we tried all available JunOS releases, even a few beta images. Yes, we also tried 14.1X53-D10. I am kinda stumped as to how this is even possible. While we all hate RF45 SFP for various reasons, this is totally new and unexpected. Yes, we're still having fun, Richard ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Refurbished
On Monday, October 20, 2014 03:36:53 PM Jerry Jones wrote: As long as DPC are the only line cards should work well. I am reluctant to mix with MPC in a single chassis. This should, apparently, be fixed in later code. You certainly never wanted that in Junos 10 :-). Then again, many new features are currently being built for Trio-only situations. It'd be interesting to see what happens if those features had to cross Trio and DPC on the same chassis. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Spanning tree RJ45 SFP on QFX5100
Which version of spanning tree? I've got MST running on SFP-Ts running without issue From: richih.mailingl...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:41:02 +0200 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Spanning tree RJ45 SFP on QFX5100 Dear all, we are not done debugging yet, but as of right now, we are having a rather strange effect... Our setup looks as follows: QFX5100 = CStest sw1 = 2960g sw2 = 2960g sw3 = EX3300 sw4 = 2960g sw5 = 2960S CStest RJ45 1G sw1 CStest SM 1G sw2 CStest SM 10G sw3 CStest RJ45 1G sw4 CStest SM 1G sw5 The effect we're seeing is that Spanning Tree works just fine over the Single Mode links, but not across the RJ45 SFPs. Weirdly enough, LLDP and the like are being transmitted just fine. Yes, we tried all available JunOS releases, even a few beta images. Yes, we also tried 14.1X53-D10. I am kinda stumped as to how this is even possible. While we all hate RF45 SFP for various reasons, this is totally new and unexpected. Yes, we're still having fun, Richard ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Refurbished
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On Monday, October 20, 2014 03:36:53 PM Jerry Jones wrote: As long as DPC are the only line cards should work well. I am reluctant to mix with MPC in a single chassis. This should, apparently, be fixed in later code. We run both MPC and DPC on multiple MX960s in our network without issue. We are currently on 12.3R6.6 and had run previously on 11.4R7 no problem. That said, if I had my choice and unlimited budget, the DPCs would be tossed in favor of the MPC modules. -evt ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Spanning tree RJ45 SFP on QFX5100
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, we are not done debugging yet, but as of right now, we are having a rather strange effect... Our setup looks as follows: QFX5100 = CStest sw1 = 2960g sw2 = 2960g sw3 = EX3300 sw4 = 2960g sw5 = 2960S CStest RJ45 1G sw1 CStest SM 1G sw2 CStest SM 10G sw3 CStest RJ45 1G sw4 CStest SM 1G sw5 The effect we're seeing is that Spanning Tree works just fine over the Single Mode links, but not across the RJ45 SFPs. Weirdly enough, LLDP and the like are being transmitted just fine. Yes, we tried all available JunOS releases, even a few beta images. Yes, we also tried 14.1X53-D10. I am kinda stumped as to how this is even possible. While we all hate RF45 SFP for various reasons, this is totally new and unexpected. Might be interesting to know whose RJ45 SFP's? If third party I'd personally really tend to suspect/blame the third party...might be a coding issue, might be the onboard hardware doing something silly. I'd try a different vendor SFP. It might be something Juniper is making worse and is still willing to fix even if it's not necessarily their problem - like there've been various i2c reading issues they've dramatically improved behavior for. Yes, we're still having fun, Richard ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds. -- Samuel Butler ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] unsubscrive
___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Refurbished
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:18:49 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: We run both MPC and DPC on multiple MX960s in our network without issue. We are currently on 12.3R6.6 and had run previously on 11.4R7 no problem. That said, if I had my choice and unlimited budget, the DPCs would be tossed in favor of the MPC modules. Agree - all the cool features are being coded only for Trio anyway. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
