Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Optics 10G SM XFP

2015-07-07 Thread David Miller


On 7/7/2015 12:01 AM, Dale Shaw wrote:
 Hi David,

 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Miller dmil...@tiggee.com
 mailto:dmil...@tiggee.com wrote:
 
  Can anyone tell me the differences between these two optics?
 
  XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1740-014279
  XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1-C  740-031833

 740-014279 = EX-XFP-10GE-LR (EX-series)  SRX-XFP-10GE-LR (SRX-series)
 740-031833 = XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1 (M/T/MX-series)

 They are similar transceivers but not exactly the same. Perhaps, in
 the past, the part-to-SKU mappings were different.

 The latter part seems to support some additional standards (ITU-T
 G.693 VSR2000-2R1, 8 Gb/s FC 800-SM-LC-L, 10 Gb/s CPRI, and ITU G.709
 FEC OTU1e/OTU2/OTU2e) but it may not work in platforms it hasn't been
 qualified for.

 Cheers,
 Dale


Many thanks for all the replies.

All that I have on hand at the moment are 740-031833 optics, so I can't
do side by side testing.  I have some 740-014279 optics on the way to me
and I'll check them out and report back what I find.

To add to the fun, I have some optics labeled as the 740-031833 part
number with and without the trailing -C
https://imgur.com/2MN8KMa

My first suspicion was that the two optics were designed for different
operating temperature ranges (CO vs DC), but the above part descriptions
lead me to believe that these are essentially the same optics
differentiated mostly by whether they are sold for EX/SRX or M/T/MX.

-DMM


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Basic Implementation of VLAN/LogicalPort across MPLS

2015-07-07 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Levi,

 I've setup an MPLS ring and with your help it's running beautifully. With
 it I can easily make port congruence across the MPLS ring with few issues.
 For example send a single from one side of the MPLS ring to the other if
 the signal lands on a port directly.  I.E a physical interface.

Based on your previous email, I’m assuming your transport labels are all 
RSVP-based.

 Where I'm having trouble now is landing or starting from a logical
 interface such as a VLAN.

For an aggregate interface, make sure you have flexible-ethernet-services 
configure on the physical interface (or vlan-ccc, but if not all units are 
going to be l2circuits, then stick with flexible-ethernet-services), and then 
encapsulation vlan-ccc for all the sub-interfaces you wish to tunnel:

interfaces {
ae0 {
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
active;
}
vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 10 {
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
vlan-id 10;
}
unit 20 {   
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
vlan-id 20;
}
}
}

To bring up an l2circuit, it’s just a simple matter of assigning and ID to the 
port, and mapping it to a remote PE:

protocols {
l2circuit {
neighbor 1.2.3.4 {— the far-side PE loopback where you want the 
other end of the tunnel to come out
interface ae0.10 {   — your local interface
virtual-circuit-id 10;   — unique identifier
}
}
}
}

Cheers,

Ben
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Basic Implementation of VLAN/LogicalPort across MPLS

2015-07-07 Thread Mark Tees
Hi Levi,

Can you please post the relevant config?

show configuration protocols l2circuit
show l2ciruit connections
show configuration interfaces

Of course chop out any sensitive bits there.

Cheers,

Mark

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015, Levi Pederson levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
wrote:

 All,

 I've setup an MPLS ring and with your help it's running beautifully. With
 it I can easily make port congruence across the MPLS ring with few issues.
 For example send a single from one side of the MPLS ring to the other if
 the signal lands on a port directly.  I.E a physical interface.

 Where I'm having trouble now is landing or starting from a logical
 interface such as a VLAN.

 For example.

 I'm receiving the signal onto a port on PE1 and I need to Add it to a Trunk
 Port which is also an aggregate link (ae0 say VLAN 3999).  Each router
 currently holds only 1 switched path to each other PE (3 LSPs per device)
  4 Devices total.

 My thoughts were to use this


 http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.1/topics/task/configuration/mpls-l2-circuit-cli.html#jd0e171

 That turned out to be incorrect or at least I did something that did not
 agree with he system.

 My l2circuit attempts seem to not pull up when attempted.

 Any help or direction would be appreciated.  I'm not looking for massive
 l2VPN or anything like that just the simpler l2circuit

 I can provide a diagram and documents for those with a serious request to
 help.

 Thank you,

 *Levi Pederson*
 Mankato Networks LLC
 cell | 612.481.0769
 work | 612.787.7392
 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net javascript:;
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net javascript:;
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



-- 
Regards,

Mark L. Tees
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp