[j-nsp] MACsec interoperability between MX10003 and Cisco ASR 9k?
Hello, I'm currently trying to find out if somebody has already tested if MACsec can be used on a 100G port between MX10003 and Cisco ASR 9k (required licenses will be installed on both routers). Yes, MACsec is a standard, but... ;-) Unfortunately Juniper currently has no MX10003 available in the loaner pool. They have an MX10003 in their lab in Amsterdam, but no ASR 9k. Therefore I cannot test is by myself and hope somebody else already made some experience. Thanks in advance and regards, Chris ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Use IGP metrics for BGP routes
> Of "Rolf Hanßen" > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 6:23 PM > > Hello, > > we run ibgp over ISIS/MPLS (exchanging loopback IPs only) and run BGP > loopback to loopback (next-hop self). > Can somebody tell me if there is a possibility to use the igp metric for the bgp > routes. > The feature you're looking for is BGP aigp: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/bgp-aigp-up derstanding.html adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Use IGP metrics for BGP routes
Hello, we run ibgp over ISIS/MPLS (exchanging loopback IPs only) and run BGP loopback to loopback (next-hop self). Can somebody tell me if there is a possibility to use the igp metric for the bgp routes. Let's say I have 2 peerings (AMSIX/DECIX) and some kind of ring network. My network is closer to maybe AMSIX and I use km distance for igp metrics. So Amsix is maybe 100km and DECIX 300km away, i.e. igp and lsp metrics of the amsix-router loopback ip is 100 and towards DECIX 300. Now I would like to use those values also for the eBGP routes learned from peers to use the locally nearest exchange. What I am trying to archieve is that in case of an outage of the short connection the traffic of dual connected peers swaps to DECIX because the IGP metric to AMSIX will increase if traffic runs the failover-path (let's say 1000km). I can set it statically, but found no way to use the dynamic values. I thought this would be the result of "set policy-options policy-statement test123 then metric igp", but that's not the case. All routes have "MED 0", in case of nexthop=lsp (IPv4) as well as ISIS-only nexthop (IPv6). If there is no such option, what is the usual ways to solve such issues? kind regards Rolf ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] 6PE static route
Hello, Does anyone know if it's possible to create a 6PE static default route? It tried creating one like this: set routing-options rib inet6.0 static route ::/0 next-hop :::1.2.3.4 set routing-options rib inet6.0 static route ::/0 resolve I have an ISIS-SR label for 1.2.3.4 in inet3.0. When I look at ::/0 it shows a single label push with the same label as 1.2.3.4. However, there is no BGP 6PE label 2 service label. Is there a way to tell the box to add this? Thanks, Serge ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
