Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
> > My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304, > various protocols no longer work. This seems more than just > honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no longer function. This is new to me; > that Juniper is making protocols and technologies tied to license. I > need to understand more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's. > This is news to me as well. Definitely not the case on smaller or much larger MXes. On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 3:20 PM Aaron Gould wrote: > My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304, > various protocols no longer work. This seems more than just > honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no longer function. This is new to me; > that Juniper is making protocols and technologies tied to license. I > need to understand more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's. > > -Aaron > > On 10/24/2023 4:18 AM, Karl Gerhard via juniper-nsp wrote: > > On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote: > >> Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will > >> just grump at you on commits. > > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304, various protocols no longer work. This seems more than just honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no longer function. This is new to me; that Juniper is making protocols and technologies tied to license. I need to understand more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's. -Aaron On 10/24/2023 4:18 AM, Karl Gerhard via juniper-nsp wrote: On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote: Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will just grump at you on commits. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote: Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will just grump at you on commits. It depends. MACSEC on EX and QFX first had a license warning and a permanent minor alert when configured on these platforms. With Junos 18 they introduced MACSEC License Enforcement, i.e. no more MACSEC for you if you don't have a valid license installed. https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/MACsec-license-enforcement-on-EX-and-QFX-Series-Switches?language=en_US Introducing license warnings and minor alerts when conifguring a static route on MX304 might be a sign of things to come. When buying MX304, you are now running the risk of this device only being able to work as a switch after a firmware upgrade, unless you have a valid license installed. Regards Karl On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: On 10/18/23 15:47, Aaron1 via juniper-nsp wrote: Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore Any details on what this license does, and if there is any operational risk if you don't apply it? Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing listjuniper-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing listjuniper-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
