Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QFX5200-32c and QSFP28 channelized optics
Subscription Notice - Knowledge Base (KB) - Juniper Networks Knowledge
* Configure port speed independently on interfaces with channelization
- last modified 2024-01-12,
https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/Configure-port-speed-independently-on-interfaces-with-channelization?language=en_US
* Channelizing Interfaces on QFX5120-32C Switches - last modified 2024-01-15,
https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/Channelizing-Interfaces-QFX5120-32C-Switches?language=en_US
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 16:47, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
>
> I can confirm using a QSFP+ to SFP+ adapter works, too. (Lane 0 being wired
> to the front, lane 1-3 are not used)
>
> With the following configuration
>
> fpc 0 {
> pic 0 {
> /* Set in groups of four, e.g. 0-3, Here 8-11 */
> port 8 {
> channel-speed 10g;
> }
> port 9 {
> channel-speed 10g;
> }
> port 10 {
> channel-speed 10g;
> }
> port 11 {
> channel-speed 10g;
> }
> }
> }
>
> With the following type of converter optic. Example -
> https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72582.html (QSFP+ to 10G SFP+)
> https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/178066.html (QSFP28 to 25G SFP28)
>
> (This is on 5120-32c)
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 15:39, Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
> wrote:
>>
>> For 10G support, you need to use a 40G [proper] Optic and channelize this to
>> 4 x 10G.
>>
>> Just FYI. Rih
>>
>> Richard McGovern
>> Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
>> 978-618-3342
>>
>> I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good
>> I don’t make the news, I just report it
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>
>> On 12/29/23, 12:44 PM, "Lee Starnes" wrote:
>> Thanks for the info and links Tobias. really helpful. It must just be a
>> Juniper thing that it supports only 25G because on Cisco and Mikrotik it
>> supports down to 1G. Anyway, at least I have answers and a solution.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Lee
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 1:31 AM Tobias Heister via juniper-nsp <
>> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > While it sometimes works to let 25G transceivers run at 10G (depending
>> > on Transceiver and Device(s)) i think in this case you will need a
>> > different transceiver.
>> >
>> > See e.g. HCT for reference:
>> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/?prd=QFX5200-32C
>> >
>> > the PSM only lists 25 and 100 as being supported:
>> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/model/?component=JNP-QSFP-100G-PSM4
>> >
>> > For 10G SM Breakout something like
>> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/model/?component=JNP-QSFP-4X10GE-LR would
>> > be the way to go.
>> >
>> >
>> > regards
>> > Tobias
>> >
>> > Am 29.12.2023 um 02:38 schrieb Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp:
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I am running into an issue on our QFX5200 switches where I have
>> > installed a
>> > > QSFP-100G-PSM4 optic. This can do 1G/10G/25G on the 4 channels. My issue
>> > is
>> > > that I am not able to get the interfaces to go to 10G even though I have
>> > > set them as such.
>> > >
>> > > If setting all 4 channels to 10G only a single interface shows at 100G.
>> > If
>> > > I set them all to 25G, all 4 show as 25G. Then if I change one of the
>> > > channels to 10G, all 4 remain as 25G.
>> > >
>> > > Is this an issue with how I am setting this up or an issue with the type
>> > of
>> > > Optic being used? Below is the config for the ports in the last state I
>> > > tested.
>> > >
>> > > chassis {
>> > > fpc 0 {
>> > > pic 0 {
>> > > port 0 {
>> > > channel-speed 10g;
>> > > }
>> > > port 1 {
>> > > channel-speed 25g;
>> > > }
>> > > port 2 {
>> > > channel-speed 25g;
>> > > }
>> > > port 3 {
>> > > channel-speed 25g;
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for any info or documents you can point me to.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > >
>> > > -Lee
>> > > ___
>> > > juniper-nsp mailing list
>> > > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AbnHWywEEDeGUttHzSqPdMr77UVBTZwTxHBmbOc2aX4jAbP3ToR5pp5zbJKE4mWA89WcIYMO_abVAdgp-9LYpIuFQd48K9FI$
>> > >
>> > ___
>> > juniper-nsp mailing list
>> > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> >
Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 14:18, chiel via juniper-nsp wrote: > > Is there a difference between "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"? > > I thought the "MX204" has honored based license, which isn't sold > anymore. Where the "MX204-HW-BASE" (also end of sale but still widely > available) enforces the license after version 22.2R1 for BGP. Is this > assumption correct? > > If there is indeed this difference how can I distinguish these two > platforms from the CLI? > > I have a MX204 with version 22.3R3.8 without a license installed on it > and its doing BGP just fine. So I guess I have the older MX204 model? Last I heard back from a contact at VAR we use at $dayjob was to downgrade to <= 22.1R2-S1 (H1/2023). I.e. 22.2 and above will enforce the new license schema. No clarification have had been received what Juniper intends to do concerning MX204 owners with the "old" perpetual license. Wishing to upgrade to newer 22.2 or 22.4 releases. If you have a support contract with them. I recommend estacalting the question with them. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QFX5200-32c and QSFP28 channelized optics
I can confirm using a QSFP+ to SFP+ adapter works, too. (Lane 0 being wired
to the front, lane 1-3 are not used)
With the following configuration
fpc 0 {
pic 0 {
/* Set in groups of four, e.g. 0-3, Here 8-11 */
port 8 {
channel-speed 10g;
}
port 9 {
channel-speed 10g;
}
port 10 {
channel-speed 10g;
}
port 11 {
channel-speed 10g;
}
}
}
With the following type of converter optic. Example -
https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72582.html (QSFP+ to 10G SFP+)
https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/178066.html (QSFP28 to 25G SFP28)
(This is on 5120-32c)
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 15:39, Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp <
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> For 10G support, you need to use a 40G [proper] Optic and channelize this
> to 4 x 10G.
>
> Just FYI. Rih
>
> Richard McGovern
> Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
> 978-618-3342
>
> I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good
> I don’t make the news, I just report it
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> On 12/29/23, 12:44 PM, "Lee Starnes" wrote:
> Thanks for the info and links Tobias. really helpful. It must just be a
> Juniper thing that it supports only 25G because on Cisco and Mikrotik it
> supports down to 1G. Anyway, at least I have answers and a solution.
>
> Best,
>
> -Lee
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 1:31 AM Tobias Heister via juniper-nsp <
> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > While it sometimes works to let 25G transceivers run at 10G (depending
> > on Transceiver and Device(s)) i think in this case you will need a
> > different transceiver.
> >
> > See e.g. HCT for reference:
> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/?prd=QFX5200-32C
> >
> > the PSM only lists 25 and 100 as being supported:
> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/model/?component=JNP-QSFP-100G-PSM4
> >
> > For 10G SM Breakout something like
> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/model/?component=JNP-QSFP-4X10GE-LR would
> > be the way to go.
> >
> >
> > regards
> > Tobias
> >
> > Am 29.12.2023 um 02:38 schrieb Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I am running into an issue on our QFX5200 switches where I have
> > installed a
> > > QSFP-100G-PSM4 optic. This can do 1G/10G/25G on the 4 channels. My
> issue
> > is
> > > that I am not able to get the interfaces to go to 10G even though I
> have
> > > set them as such.
> > >
> > > If setting all 4 channels to 10G only a single interface shows at 100G.
> > If
> > > I set them all to 25G, all 4 show as 25G. Then if I change one of the
> > > channels to 10G, all 4 remain as 25G.
> > >
> > > Is this an issue with how I am setting this up or an issue with the
> type
> > of
> > > Optic being used? Below is the config for the ports in the last state I
> > > tested.
> > >
> > > chassis {
> > > fpc 0 {
> > > pic 0 {
> > > port 0 {
> > > channel-speed 10g;
> > > }
> > > port 1 {
> > > channel-speed 25g;
> > > }
> > > port 2 {
> > > channel-speed 25g;
> > > }
> > > port 3 {
> > > channel-speed 25g;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Thanks for any info or documents you can point me to.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > -Lee
> > > ___
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AbnHWywEEDeGUttHzSqPdMr77UVBTZwTxHBmbOc2aX4jAbP3ToR5pp5zbJKE4mWA89WcIYMO_abVAdgp-9LYpIuFQd48K9FI$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AbnHWywEEDeGUttHzSqPdMr77UVBTZwTxHBmbOc2aX4jAbP3ToR5pp5zbJKE4mWA89WcIYMO_abVAdgp-9LYpIuFQd48K9FI$
> >
> > >
> > ___
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AbnHWywEEDeGUttHzSqPdMr77UVBTZwTxHBmbOc2aX4jAbP3ToR5pp5zbJKE4mWA89WcIYMO_abVAdgp-9LYpIuFQd48K9FI$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AbnHWywEEDeGUttHzSqPdMr77UVBTZwTxHBmbOc2aX4jAbP3ToR5pp5zbJKE4mWA89WcIYMO_abVAdgp-9LYpIuFQd48K9FI$
> >
> >
>
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / EVPN-VXLAN with IPv6 underlay
Dennis, On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 15:26, Denis Fondras via juniper-nsp wrote: > Can you give a clue ? I haven't found any information on wether it could work > on > QFX5110. Looking at the two pages below. 1. The QFX5120 (assuming this also applies to the QFX5120-32C model) *only* supports the default-switch forwarding instance. 2. And IPv6 underlays seem to be *exactly not* supported for the default-switch forwarding instance. If I take this from what it reads. It looks like you cannot archive what you are trying atm. Try asking JTAC to confirm this? From: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/evpn-vxlan/topics/concept/mac-vrf-routing-instance-overview.html#xd_4081e20476f017c2--1e138ae7-1795628658a--7dbc__subsection_mac-vrf-service-types """ EX4400, QFX5100, QFX5110, QFX5120, QFX5200, QFX5130-32CD, and QFX5700 switches, and PTX10001-36MR, PTX10004, PTX10008, PTX10016 routers These devices support only one forwarding instance (default-switch). (...) """ From: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/evpn-vxlan/topics/topic-map/vxlan-ipv6-underlay-overview.html """ (QFX Series switches) You must use MAC-VRF routing instances with EVPN protocol and VXLAN encapsulation. We don't support IPv6 underlays with other instance types such as evpn, evpn-vpws, virtual-switch or the default switching instance. """ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
