Hi, I wonder what kind of redundancy the community would prefer for small-medium sized PoPs. This is what I have come up with so far:
a) 2xMX80 Pro: Two seperate devices so less prone to config errors and chassis failure Con: Using redundant uplinks is more complicated (LB would need to be done via routing protocol) b) 1xMX240/480 with redundant SCB and RE Pro: Easier to use redundant uplinks (LACP) Con: Config error as well as chassis failure brings the whole PoP down Any further arguments? Best practices? What did you deploy? Best regards, Markus _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp