Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool

[Randy Manning]

Get a demo of Packet Design Route Explorer as well. Www.packetdesign.com


Thanks,
-
Randy Manning
Systems Engineer
Packet Design | 7801 N. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 230 | Austin, TX 78731
Office: +1.301.395.1772 | Fax: +1.512.865.6950
Visit our Website http://www.packetdesign.com/ | Follow us on Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/packetdesign | Join us on LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/company/packet-design










On 12/24/14, 11:40 AM, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com wrote:

Junosphere doesn't do that type of modeling and simulation but WANDL
does.  Juniper may be working on Junosphere/WANDL integration now that
they own WANDL. They used to support Cariden MATE within Junosphere but
stopped when Cisco bought Cariden.

WANDL will certainly do what you want, I would talk to your sales rep
about it.  The other popular tools are Cariden MATE now owned by Cisco
and OpNet now owned by Riverbed.

Cariden was the easiest to use in my previous experience.

Phil

-Original Message-
From: jjsyed--- via juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: ?12/?23/?2014 7:52 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool

Hello,

can somebody give me  feedback on the two tool I am thinking about using
and cannot decide which one to use. I think the answer depends on what
needs to be done? I am planning to decommission some services from my
backbone and like to move over those existing ckt to pt to pt link. I am
pretty sure there will be change in traffic pattern , flows etc, so I
need to know which tool can help me or give me good picture of the
network in present and future state.  I am looking at wandl or
Junosphere. 
 
thanks 






___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] juniper qfx5100 vs ex9200

[Randy Manning]

People,

Any advice on a distribution layer switch for campus networks?  juniper
qfx5100 vs ex9200?  I am not sure what the requirements need to be a
priority.  The core is MX 960 and currently routing.  I am thinking about
campus distro¹s becoming PE with TE and allowing the core¹s to label
switch only?  Given the current network and possible change, which
platform is the best?  Qfx or ex?

Data centers are working well with q-fabric, but I understand that has
been abandoned by juniperŠ. Which is sadŠ I liked the eVPN BGP NLRI design.


Thanks,
-
Randy








___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp