Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Martin
One reason to do this is to use a different egress PE classification  
scheme and rewrite ruleset than what is used in the core.  This  
allows for setting different core EXP values than what would be  
preserved at egress and then, potentially, used for egress marking,  
thus maintaining TOS transparency end-to-end.  I believe this is  
called the short-pipe model.


C

On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Lynch, Tomas wrote:

Why would you want to do that? Labels are used only inside your  
backbone
where you have the same QoS policy in all the routers. It's going  
to be

a burden to configure QoS policies on interfaces because you will have
to think is this router doing the PHP or not?

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Li Zhu
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:46 PM
To: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

Masood, Nugroho

Thank you for the reply. I agree with both of you that rewrite takes
effect
on both inner and outer mpls label. My next question is:
what if I want to mark inner and outer MPLS label differently? Say I
want
mark the inner exp with 5 and outer exp with 6? Is it possible to
achieve
this?

Thanks,

Li

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:


the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in

label

stack.

Regards,
Masood


All,

There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is

from

CE
to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets

out

PE

(then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer

tag?


Thanks,

Li
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp






___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Martin
One possibility would be to manually set the MPLS exp bit on your  
RSVP tunnel under edit protocols mpls label-switched-path.  This  
overrides the CoS setting for rewrite (but not the scheduler  
config).  If you are using LDP, you use the set protocols mpls  
interface name label-map label-val command.  Note that this is a  
crude method and not exactly what you are probably looking for.


C



On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Lynch, Tomas wrote:

Why would you want to do that? Labels are used only inside your  
backbone
where you have the same QoS policy in all the routers. It's going  
to be

a burden to configure QoS policies on interfaces because you will have
to think is this router doing the PHP or not?

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Li Zhu
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:46 PM
To: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

Masood, Nugroho

Thank you for the reply. I agree with both of you that rewrite takes
effect
on both inner and outer mpls label. My next question is:
what if I want to mark inner and outer MPLS label differently? Say I
want
mark the inner exp with 5 and outer exp with 6? Is it possible to
achieve
this?

Thanks,

Li

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:


the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in

label

stack.

Regards,
Masood


All,

There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is

from

CE
to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets

out

PE

(then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer

tag?


Thanks,

Li
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp






___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-08 Thread masood

With the current hardware/software arch, I'm afraid you can't do that (I'm
not sure though).

Regards,
Masood


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Li Zhu
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 11:46 PM
To: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

Masood, Nugroho

Thank you for the reply. I agree with both of you that rewrite takes effect
on both inner and outer mpls label. My next question is:

what if I want to mark inner and outer MPLS label differently? Say I want
mark the inner exp with 5 and outer exp with 6? Is it possible to achieve
this?

Thanks,

Li

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:

 the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in label
 stack.

 Regards,
 Masood

  All,
 
  There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from
  CE
  to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out
 PE
  (then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
  rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
  will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer tag?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Li
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 



___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-08 Thread Lynch, Tomas
Why would you want to do that? Labels are used only inside your backbone
where you have the same QoS policy in all the routers. It's going to be
a burden to configure QoS policies on interfaces because you will have
to think is this router doing the PHP or not?

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Li Zhu
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:46 PM
To: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

Masood, Nugroho

Thank you for the reply. I agree with both of you that rewrite takes
effect
on both inner and outer mpls label. My next question is:
what if I want to mark inner and outer MPLS label differently? Say I
want
mark the inner exp with 5 and outer exp with 6? Is it possible to
achieve
this?

Thanks,

Li

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:

 the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in
label
 stack.

 Regards,
 Masood

  All,
 
  There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is
from
  CE
  to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets
out
 PE
  (then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
  rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
  will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer
tag?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Li
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 



___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-07 Thread Li Zhu
All,

There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from CE
to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out PE
(then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer tag?

Thanks,

Li
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-07 Thread masood
the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in label
stack.

Regards,
Masood

 All,

 There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from
 CE
 to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out PE
 (then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
 rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
 will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer tag?

 Thanks,

 Li
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-07 Thread Nugroho WH Adisubrata
Hi Li Zhu,
It should be rewrite both inner and outer mpls label.
If it is only rewrite into the outer label, then you will get a problem in
PHP router.

My 2c.

Resend and CC into the mailist.


On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Li Zhu l...@njit.edu wrote:

 All,

 There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from CE
 to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out PE
 (then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
 rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
 will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer tag?

 Thanks,

 Li
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

2009-06-07 Thread Li Zhu
Masood, Nugroho

Thank you for the reply. I agree with both of you that rewrite takes effect
on both inner and outer mpls label. My next question is:
what if I want to mark inner and outer MPLS label differently? Say I want
mark the inner exp with 5 and outer exp with 6? Is it possible to achieve
this?

Thanks,

Li

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:

 the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in label
 stack.

 Regards,
 Masood

  All,
 
  There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from
  CE
  to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out
 PE
  (then to P), it is double-tagged with MPLS lable. There is a exp
  rewrite-rule applied on PE link to P router. My questions is
  will the rewrite-rule take effect on both tags or only the outer tag?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Li
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 



___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp