Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/12/2016 05:46 PM, Giuliano Medalha wrote: > It is an excelent option > > We are testing it like metro router righ now > > It has a lot of good mpls/vpls implementation ( packet mode ) and > works fine > > Good interfaces layout > > But the problem is related to the business unit ... Of this box > > The main function is ng firewall and not metro router > > When the mpls functions have some problems of junos code the > juniper business and development tesm unit could not help so much > ... Or put it to solve in a low priority development queue in > function to solve security problems first > > But we will try ... It is an excelent box for that > > Thanks a lot > > Giuliano > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 12, 2016, at 11:33, Roger Wiklund >> wrote: >> >> What about the new SRX1500, x86 platform, 2m routes: >> >> https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000551-en. pdf >> >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky >> wrote: >>>> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com] Sent: >>>> Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:30 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: Satish >>>> Patel; Aaron; jnsp list; Vincent Bernat Subject: Re: [j-nsp] >>>> MX80 base model >>>> >>>> I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold >>>> full routes, and the MX104 does. >>> Yes you're correct, especially since OP is looking for a >>> peering box, unfortunately ASR903 can hold max 256K routes in >>> FIB. But other than the # of prefixes that FIB can hold i.e. >>> comparing these as PE routers these boxes are pretty similar. >>> >>> adam >>> >>> >>> Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer >>> >>> T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: >>> www.gamma.co.uk >>> >>> This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. >>> The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary >>> user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email >>> is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else >>> may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any >>> of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive >>> this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be >>> obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 >>> 178 9652 or email postmas...@gamma.co.uk >>> >>> Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and >>> Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, >>> and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD >>> and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings >>> Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. >>> >>> >>> ___ juniper-nsp >>> mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> ___ juniper-nsp >> mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing > list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > Have you played with it with full table ? How fast does it take it in ? Georg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXYlptAAoJEFDOdES6xIFjZWYP/0ULhED3/PsdRHF6Vrc1Y94U neS2ad6hJpFwV90gPlgw1p7euUAtfDJBifpwrcA9iBWdk1rp7y35OoUCZd91cydT WHSrQhW4KMVIw0ejwrjVYJTmUDzVBIpJ/7K2LlOqCEhp8lOBTBUAwS25k6b9SPlO pMFH9NhaMoOVhGjElUXiPBC0W0E4ZUX8Ha4YOnmLAATEh4Okd56c69BqOWh5klP2 UVS9Bp79JJg00wMC+hFILhGgHO34dtFQvvlD7iWiFLQvDb8ZPaiI6t2LRDxk4TnT rZH27NJZdvKp9xV5kUsrH+9fEzGu2MZr4hiU4NfAN6i6bZaOdkKxt6rJeO5DjLye PzJ4dgIP7SEyrefr3HlKNfOzTLbZBgmn7Qj/ruSRWByAx8AebtWzppipcLcuKaK2 xlV/0JXvPqC+rb5n2RNEgvsnBHXJL5NEDhWOVcENP8bBqam/aXSjx/CKhDlwE/5u 1DCkDr6/ENqknpvS6QWmjTQ9T3xAPNvGXB2dNDf9lqqdI/LnxeZ0MRVzQCmiUGM2 S/CMzIngKA7/Sx1xlsis8nwmE0upz4lANImmj+tcPeKG5RjWBa6irxK65YxlJL/Y cDHOCPQyLMYvGd90THcAtjYz/rRSDmzJGqE8ukHSusCwALKsv6uxNohnGCg12CHn puWdMgwnhJ7K0T1vT6zv =XR6C -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
Packet mode is working in srx1500 ? This box is pretty new, and on the paper look a very versatile toolbox. -- Raphael Mazelier Le 12/05/2016 à 16:46, Giuliano Medalha a écrit : It is an excelent option We are testing it like metro router righ now It has a lot of good mpls/vpls implementation ( packet mode ) and works fine Good interfaces layout But the problem is related to the business unit ... Of this box The main function is ng firewall and not metro router When the mpls functions have some problems of junos code the juniper business and development tesm unit could not help so much ... Or put it to solve in a low priority development queue in function to solve security problems first But we will try ... It is an excelent box for that Thanks a lot ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
It is an excelent option We are testing it like metro router righ now It has a lot of good mpls/vpls implementation ( packet mode ) and works fine Good interfaces layout But the problem is related to the business unit ... Of this box The main function is ng firewall and not metro router When the mpls functions have some problems of junos code the juniper business and development tesm unit could not help so much ... Or put it to solve in a low priority development queue in function to solve security problems first But we will try ... It is an excelent box for that Thanks a lot Giuliano Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2016, at 11:33, Roger Wiklund wrote: > > What about the new SRX1500, x86 platform, 2m routes: > > https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000551-en.pdf > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky > wrote: >>> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:30 PM >>> To: Adam Vitkovsky >>> Cc: Satish Patel; Aaron; jnsp list; Vincent Bernat >>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model >>> >>> I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold full routes, >>> and >>> the MX104 does. >> Yes you're correct, especially since OP is looking for a peering box, >> unfortunately ASR903 can hold max 256K routes in FIB. >> But other than the # of prefixes that FIB can hold i.e. comparing these as >> PE routers these boxes are pretty similar. >> >> adam >> >> >>Adam Vitkovsky >>IP Engineer >> >> T: 0333 006 5936 >> E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk >> W: www.gamma.co.uk >> >> This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of >> this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to >> which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal >> relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward >> all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive >> this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you >> would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email >> postmas...@gamma.co.uk >> >> Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with >> limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered >> office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of >> business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. >> >> >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
What about the new SRX1500, x86 platform, 2m routes: https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000551-en.pdf On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: >> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:30 PM >> To: Adam Vitkovsky >> Cc: Satish Patel; Aaron; jnsp list; Vincent Bernat >> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model >> >> I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold full routes, and >> the MX104 does. >> > Yes you're correct, especially since OP is looking for a peering box, > unfortunately ASR903 can hold max 256K routes in FIB. > But other than the # of prefixes that FIB can hold i.e. comparing these as PE > routers these boxes are pretty similar. > > adam > > > Adam Vitkovsky > IP Engineer > > T: 0333 006 5936 > E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk > W: www.gamma.co.uk > > This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of > this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to > which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal > relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward > all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this > email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would > telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email > postmas...@gamma.co.uk > > Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with > limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered > office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of > business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:30 PM > To: Adam Vitkovsky > Cc: Satish Patel; Aaron; jnsp list; Vincent Bernat > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model > > I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold full routes, and > the MX104 does. > Yes you're correct, especially since OP is looking for a peering box, unfortunately ASR903 can hold max 256K routes in FIB. But other than the # of prefixes that FIB can hold i.e. comparing these as PE routers these boxes are pretty similar. adam Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: www.gamma.co.uk This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmas...@gamma.co.uk Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold full routes, and the MX104 does. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Satish Patel > > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:15 PM > > To: Aaron > > Cc: jnsp list; Vincent Bernat > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model > > > > should i compare MX104 with ASR1006 or ASR9001 ? > > > You should compare MX104 with ASR903 > > adam > > > Adam Vitkovsky > IP Engineer > > T: 0333 006 5936 > E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk > W: www.gamma.co.uk > > This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents > of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to > which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal > relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or > forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you > receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be > obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or > email postmas...@gamma.co.uk > > Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with > limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered > office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of > business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
> Satish Patel > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:15 PM > To: Aaron > Cc: jnsp list; Vincent Bernat > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model > > should i compare MX104 with ASR1006 or ASR9001 ? > You should compare MX104 with ASR903 adam Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: www.gamma.co.uk This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmas...@gamma.co.uk Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
On 26/Apr/16 19:14, Satish Patel wrote: > should i compare MX104 with ASR1006 or ASR9001 ? ASR1000. Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
should i compare MX104 with ASR1006 or ASR9001 ? On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Aaron wrote: > On that google site, they appear to have their 40 gig number wrong for the > ACX5048... (6) 40 gig interfaces... then 6*4 = 24 + 48 = 72 total 10 gig > interfaces > > https://60d0d3c5-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/juniperbuilder/home/juniper-routers/acx-routers/Slide2.JPG?attachauth=ANoY7crvXWR72e5hO4sOrZjpNq4jfRupmmZuj6WjOZM7UI1JiS_HzC_877rEX0yxqKbh8BLO-Rs-GKd4D1FLuLio4kJJEeOCHLN-H7rx4dy0C4b8N3ABVagirXcyGTpQaN0LI-njDYr0YJMOjpcFkL1-HiPmUXNvFT-3B02XCNoyswly-5goWsezlxu684dfw90EMu8jR6hk7aRXfh-3fZYR38_6Zqu5QnWmmiDHHh7Ek8PrJzp6G2rVxHWuBgBPhXcbVaMpS_uB&attredirects=0 > > > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Vincent Bernat > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:03 AM > To: Satish Patel > Cc: jnsp list > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model > > ❦ 25 avril 2016 19:34 -0400, Satish Patel : > >> Does MX104 base model has 10G ports are lock? Also do I need to pay to >> run BGP? > > The MX104 comes in a lot of (license) derivatives. Some of them have the > ports unlocked, some other needs a licence to use the ports and some of them > can't use them (eg MX5). There is a presentation with all the info you could > ask from a Juniper representative. Also, the following link seems to contain > an accurate summary: > https://sites.google.com/site/juniperbuilder/home/juniper-routers/mx104 > > -- > He hath eaten me out of house and home. > -- William Shakespeare, "Henry IV" > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
On that google site, they appear to have their 40 gig number wrong for the ACX5048... (6) 40 gig interfaces... then 6*4 = 24 + 48 = 72 total 10 gig interfaces https://60d0d3c5-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/juniperbuilder/home/juniper-routers/acx-routers/Slide2.JPG?attachauth=ANoY7crvXWR72e5hO4sOrZjpNq4jfRupmmZuj6WjOZM7UI1JiS_HzC_877rEX0yxqKbh8BLO-Rs-GKd4D1FLuLio4kJJEeOCHLN-H7rx4dy0C4b8N3ABVagirXcyGTpQaN0LI-njDYr0YJMOjpcFkL1-HiPmUXNvFT-3B02XCNoyswly-5goWsezlxu684dfw90EMu8jR6hk7aRXfh-3fZYR38_6Zqu5QnWmmiDHHh7Ek8PrJzp6G2rVxHWuBgBPhXcbVaMpS_uB&attredirects=0 -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent Bernat Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:03 AM To: Satish Patel Cc: jnsp list Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model ❦ 25 avril 2016 19:34 -0400, Satish Patel : > Does MX104 base model has 10G ports are lock? Also do I need to pay to > run BGP? The MX104 comes in a lot of (license) derivatives. Some of them have the ports unlocked, some other needs a licence to use the ports and some of them can't use them (eg MX5). There is a presentation with all the info you could ask from a Juniper representative. Also, the following link seems to contain an accurate summary: https://sites.google.com/site/juniperbuilder/home/juniper-routers/mx104 -- He hath eaten me out of house and home. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry IV" ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
❦ 25 avril 2016 19:34 -0400, Satish Patel : > Does MX104 base model has 10G ports are lock? Also do I need to pay to > run BGP? The MX104 comes in a lot of (license) derivatives. Some of them have the ports unlocked, some other needs a licence to use the ports and some of them can't use them (eg MX5). There is a presentation with all the info you could ask from a Juniper representative. Also, the following link seems to contain an accurate summary: https://sites.google.com/site/juniperbuilder/home/juniper-routers/mx104 -- He hath eaten me out of house and home. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry IV" ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
A Google search for "juniper MX used" and some phone calls to some of the vendors in the top 10 would be a good place to start, if you are not going to buy from an authorized reseller. > On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:13 PM, Satish Patel wrote: > > How much it cost to activate 10G ports on MX104? > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Josh Baird wrote: >> The bundle that I purchased included S-MX104-ADV-R2, so no extra licensing >> for BGP or additional routes was necessary. >> >> Josh >> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Mat Perkins wrote: >>> >>> Well, if you are happy running it against the licencing terms you don't. >>> If you want to run over 20k routes? They want you to buy the full layer3 >>> license, and under the light one. So it will work, but don't expect support >>> on it. >>> >>> Mat >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Josh Baird wrote: No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This requires additional licensing. You don't need additional licensing for BGP. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel wrote: > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k > > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just > 10g > link with BGP support. > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > >>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk >> wrote: >> >> No. >> >> >>> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
You should really talk to your Juniper partner or sales rep. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Satish Patel wrote: > How much it cost to activate 10G ports on MX104? > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > > The bundle that I purchased included S-MX104-ADV-R2, so no extra > licensing > > for BGP or additional routes was necessary. > > > > Josh > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Mat Perkins wrote: > >> > >> Well, if you are happy running it against the licencing terms you don't. > >> If you want to run over 20k routes? They want you to buy the full layer3 > >> license, and under the light one. So it will work, but don't expect > support > >> on it. > >> > >> Mat > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Josh Baird > wrote: > >>> > >>> No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This > >>> requires > >>> additional licensing. > >>> > >>> You don't need additional licensing for BGP. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k > >>> > > >>> > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in > base > >>> > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is > just > >>> > 10g > >>> > link with BGP support. > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Sent from my iPhone > >>> > > >>> > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > No. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? > >>> > > > >>> > ___ > >>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > >>> > > >>> ___ > >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > >> > >> > > > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
How much it cost to activate 10G ports on MX104? On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > The bundle that I purchased included S-MX104-ADV-R2, so no extra licensing > for BGP or additional routes was necessary. > > Josh > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Mat Perkins wrote: >> >> Well, if you are happy running it against the licencing terms you don't. >> If you want to run over 20k routes? They want you to buy the full layer3 >> license, and under the light one. So it will work, but don't expect support >> on it. >> >> Mat >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Josh Baird wrote: >>> >>> No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This >>> requires >>> additional licensing. >>> >>> You don't need additional licensing for BGP. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel >>> wrote: >>> >>> > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k >>> > >>> > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base >>> > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just >>> > 10g >>> > link with BGP support. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > No. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? >>> > > >>> > ___ >>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> > >>> ___ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
The bundle that I purchased included S-MX104-ADV-R2, so no extra licensing for BGP or additional routes was necessary. Josh On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Mat Perkins wrote: > Well, if you are happy running it against the licencing terms you don't. > If you want to run over 20k routes? They want you to buy the full layer3 > license, and under the light one. So it will work, but don't expect support > on it. > > Mat > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > >> No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This >> requires >> additional licensing. >> >> You don't need additional licensing for BGP. >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel >> wrote: >> >> > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k >> > >> > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base >> > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just >> 10g >> > link with BGP support. >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > No. >> > > >> > > >> > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? >> > > >> > ___ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
Well, if you are happy running it against the licencing terms you don't. If you want to run over 20k routes? They want you to buy the full layer3 license, and under the light one. So it will work, but don't expect support on it. Mat On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This requires > additional licensing. > > You don't need additional licensing for BGP. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel > wrote: > > > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k > > > > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base > > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just > 10g > > link with BGP support. > > > > -- > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk > > wrote: > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel > wrote: > > >> > > >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? > > > > > ___ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
No 10G interfaces are unlocked on the base MX104-MX5 bundle. This requires additional licensing. You don't need additional licensing for BGP. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Satish Patel wrote: > I check price on Internet it cost around $44k > > Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base > model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just 10g > link with BGP support. > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk > wrote: > > > > No. > > > > > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel wrote: > >> > >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
I check price on Internet it cost around $44k Now I need to check how many ports are open and how many locked in base model because I don't want to pay money because out requirement is just 10g link with BGP support. -- Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Chris Kawchuk wrote: > > No. > > >> On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel wrote: >> >> Also do I need to pay to run BGP? > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
No. On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:34 am, Satish Patel wrote: > Also do I need to pay to run BGP? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
Does MX104 base model has 10G ports are lock? Also do I need to pay to run BGP? -- Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > > Go with a MX104 not a MX80. New a MX104 is less expensive than a MX80. > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:20:45PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote: >> > I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does >> > MX80 base model support 20G throughput? or do i need to buy license to >> > use more 20G? >> >> The MX80 allows 40Gbps throughput (or 80Gbps in Marketing speak). >> >> > in around $17k price. i will get following. Does 4x10GE fix port are >> > locked or i need to unlock them? >> >> The MX80 come with all ports licensed. You are confusing the MX20/MX40 >> with the MX80, which are the port license restricted models, that are >> usually more expensive than the bas MX80 to start with. >> >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
Go with a MX104 not a MX80. New a MX104 is less expensive than a MX80. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:20:45PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote: > > I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does > > MX80 base model support 20G throughput? or do i need to buy license to > > use more 20G? > > The MX80 allows 40Gbps throughput (or 80Gbps in Marketing speak). > > > in around $17k price. i will get following. Does 4x10GE fix port are > > locked or i need to unlock them? > > The MX80 come with all ports licensed. You are confusing the MX20/MX40 > with the MX80, which are the port license restricted models, that are > usually more expensive than the bas MX80 to start with. > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:20:45PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote: > I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does > MX80 base model support 20G throughput? or do i need to buy license to > use more 20G? The MX80 allows 40Gbps throughput (or 80Gbps in Marketing speak). > in around $17k price. i will get following. Does 4x10GE fix port are > locked or i need to unlock them? The MX80 come with all ports licensed. You are confusing the MX20/MX40 with the MX80, which are the port license restricted models, that are usually more expensive than the bas MX80 to start with. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MX80 base model
I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does MX80 base model support 20G throughput? or do i need to buy license to use more 20G? in around $17k price. i will get following. Does 4x10GE fix port are locked or i need to unlock them? MX80 Chassis with 2 MIC slot 4x10GE fixed port MIC 3D-20GE-SFP, 20x10/100/1000MIC ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
