Re: [j-nsp] REGEX
Try [0-9]{12,}
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:53 AM, craig washington
wrote:
> Hello all, hope this is the right place for this.
>
> I am not the best with Regex and was looking for an expression in a Juniper
> that will match on only so many numbers.
>
> Meaning, I am looking at the mpls lsp statistics "show mpls lsp transit
> statistics" and I only want to see the LSP's that have larger Bytes, for
> instance I only want to see stuff that has at least 12 digits or longer.
>
>
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated, and if this is the wrong thing to ask
> here, I have no qualms with that either
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] REGEX
Hello all, hope this is the right place for this. I am not the best with Regex and was looking for an expression in a Juniper that will match on only so many numbers. Meaning, I am looking at the mpls lsp statistics "show mpls lsp transit statistics" and I only want to see the LSP's that have larger Bytes, for instance I only want to see stuff that has at least 12 digits or longer. Any help would be greatly appreciated, and if this is the wrong thing to ask here, I have no qualms with that either Thanks again. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Regex
Hi All, Can anyone confirm, are regular expressions of Cisco exactly same as those in Juniper? for example ^123$ or 456_678 will be same in Cisco and Juniper? Regards, *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410 603 531 facebook.com/eintellego PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Regex
On (2012-11-25 20:26 +1100), Ali Sumsam wrote: Can anyone confirm, are regular expressions of Cisco exactly same as those in Juniper? No. There is major difference, regexp atom in JunOS is ASN not byte/char/digit. It may sound like simple difference, but I've found lot of people with previous regexp people struggling to grasp it. JunOS design decision is superior to any other implementation I've seen, having ASN as atom makes perfect sense. Consider you want to define private ASNs, in JunOS simple as [65412-65534], in IOS horrible. Study these examples http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-policy/defining-as-path-regular-expressions.html -- ++ytti ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Regex
The first one could be used with Juniper and could be written without ^? and the second one could be written like this: 456 678 On 11/25/2012 11:26 AM, Ali Sumsam wrote: Hi All, Can anyone confirm, are regular expressions of Cisco exactly same as those in Juniper? for example ^123$ or 456_678 will be same in Cisco and Juniper? Regards, *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410 603 531 facebook.com/eintellego PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Regex
Thanks Mihai. *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410 603 531 facebook.com/eintellego PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Mihai mihaigabr...@gmail.com wrote: The first one could be used with Juniper and could be written without ^? and the second one could be written like this: 456 678 On 11/25/2012 11:26 AM, Ali Sumsam wrote: Hi All, Can anyone confirm, are regular expressions of Cisco exactly same as those in Juniper? for example ^123$ or 456_678 will be same in Cisco and Juniper? Regards, *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410 603 531 facebook.com/eintellego PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM __**_ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
