Re: [j-nsp] VLAN sub-interfaces in VRR em0?
My situation might be different than yours, but, I'm using vlan tags in junos vMX on eve-ng... (17.4R1.16) root@sabn-960-e> show interfaces ae161.0 Logical interface ae161.0 (Index 344) (SNMP ifIndex 546) Flags: Up SNMP-Traps 0x20004000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.10 ] Encapsulation: VLAN-Bridge StatisticsPacketspps Bytes bps Bundle: Input : 6278792 0 5253885840 Output: 5878898 0 497667878 256 Adaptive Statistics: Adaptive Adjusts: 0 Adaptive Scans : 0 Adaptive Updates: 0 Protocol bridge, MTU: 1522 root@sabn-960-e> show configuration interfaces ae161.0 | display set set interfaces ae161 unit 0 encapsulation vlan-bridge set interfaces ae161 unit 0 vlan-id 10 root@sabn-960-e> show arp interface irb.10 no-resolve MAC Address Address Interface Flags 02:05:86:71:20:00 172.223.10.30 irb.10 [.local..8] permanent remote 02:05:86:71:3e:00 172.223.10.31 irb.10 [ae161.0] permanent remote Total entries: 2 root@sabn-960-e> show configuration interfaces irb.10 | display set set interfaces irb unit 10 family inet address 172.223.10.1/24 set interfaces irb unit 10 mac 00:00:00:00:00:0a root@sabn-960-e> ping 172.223.10.31 PING 172.223.10.31 (172.223.10.31): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 172.223.10.31: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=106.272 ms 64 bytes from 172.223.10.31: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=144.518 ms 64 bytes from 172.223.10.31: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=180.567 ms ^C --- 172.223.10.31 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.272/143.786/180.567/30.335 ms - Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] VLAN sub-interfaces in VRR em0?
❦ 4 novembre 2019 11:02 -05, Jason Lixfeld : > Running the JunOS VRR image on EVE-NG trying to get a vlan > sub-interface working on em0: It doesn't work when using virtio, but it works with e1000. Dunno if EVE-NG allows you to pick which NIC device to use. -- Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first. -- Mark Twain ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] VLAN sub-interfaces in VRR em0?
Jason, I don't think vlan sub-interfaces are supported. We used multiple
interfaces mapped to different vlans via the Hypervisor. You can map em0 to
vlan 14 and em1 to vlan 45, ...
--
Clinton Work
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Running the JunOS VRR image on EVE-NG trying to get a vlan
> sub-interface working on em0:
>
> root@R4# show interfaces em0
> traps;
> vlan-tagging;
> mtu 1614;
> hold-time up 1 down 0;
> unit 14 {
> vlan-id 14;
> family inet {
> address 100.1.4.4/24;
> }
> family iso;
> family inet6 {
> address 2607:f0c8::100:1:4:4/112;
> }
> family mpls;
> }
> unit 45 {
> vlan-id 45;
> family inet {
> address 100.4.5.4/24;
> }
> family iso;
> family inet6 {
> address 2607:f0c8::100:4:5:4/112;
> }
> family mpls;
> }
>
> [edit]
> root@R4#
>
> R4 can ping itself at 100.1.4.4. While capturing on em0 and tying to
> ping 100.1.4.1 from R4, I see correctly tagged ARP request/reply, but
> the ARP table is empty, so no pingy.
>
> Is this not supported, or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] VLAN sub-interfaces in VRR em0?
Hey,
Running the JunOS VRR image on EVE-NG trying to get a vlan sub-interface
working on em0:
root@R4# show interfaces em0
traps;
vlan-tagging;
mtu 1614;
hold-time up 1 down 0;
unit 14 {
vlan-id 14;
family inet {
address 100.1.4.4/24;
}
family iso;
family inet6 {
address 2607:f0c8::100:1:4:4/112;
}
family mpls;
}
unit 45 {
vlan-id 45;
family inet {
address 100.4.5.4/24;
}
family iso;
family inet6 {
address 2607:f0c8::100:4:5:4/112;
}
family mpls;
}
[edit]
root@R4#
R4 can ping itself at 100.1.4.4. While capturing on em0 and tying to ping
100.1.4.1 from R4, I see correctly tagged ARP request/reply, but the ARP table
is empty, so no pingy.
Is this not supported, or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance!
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
