Re: [j-nsp] dual stack bandwidth limitation on E-series

[David Lockuan]

Hi Roman,

About your question, the LM10 for E320 and E120 don't support, for the
moment, external-parent group, this feature should be for the release
14.1.x of JunoSE.

In my case, we are using QoS profile to limit the downstream traffic and
the limit of upstream will be done in the DSLAM.

Hope I had help you.

---
David


On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Roman A. Nozdrin  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I'm trying to introduce commercial IPv6 services for pppoe customers in my
> network. I realized that I don't know how to put an aggregated limitation
> on both(ipv4/v6) downstreams. I've tried compound shared shaping and
> external parent group policing. Both features don't work the way I want.
> I'll appreciate any ideas how to put aggregated shaper or policer using
> E-120 with LM-10 cards.
>
> Roman
> __**_
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] dual stack bandwidth limitation on E-series

[Roman A. Nozdrin]

Hello All,

I'm trying to introduce commercial IPv6 services for pppoe customers in 
my network. I realized that I don't know how to put an aggregated 
limitation on both(ipv4/v6) downstreams. I've tried compound shared 
shaping and external parent group policing. Both features don't work the 
way I want. I'll appreciate any ideas how to put aggregated shaper or 
policer using E-120 with LM-10 cards.


Roman
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp