Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool
Junosphere doesn't do that type of modeling and simulation but WANDL does. Juniper may be working on Junosphere/WANDL integration now that they own WANDL. They used to support Cariden MATE within Junosphere but stopped when Cisco bought Cariden. WANDL will certainly do what you want, I would talk to your sales rep about it. The other popular tools are Cariden MATE now owned by Cisco and OpNet now owned by Riverbed. Cariden was the easiest to use in my previous experience. Phil -Original Message- From: jjsyed--- via juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: 12/23/2014 7:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool Hello, can somebody give me feedback on the two tool I am thinking about using and cannot decide which one to use. I think the answer depends on what needs to be done? I am planning to decommission some services from my backbone and like to move over those existing ckt to pt to pt link. I am pretty sure there will be change in traffic pattern , flows etc, so I need to know which tool can help me or give me good picture of the network in present and future state. I am looking at wandl or Junosphere. thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool
-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Bedard Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 11:41 AM To: jjs...@aol.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool Junosphere doesn't do that type of modeling and simulation but WANDL does. Juniper may be working on Junosphere/WANDL integration now that they own WANDL. They used to support Cariden MATE within Junosphere but stopped when Cisco bought Cariden. WANDL will certainly do what you want, I would talk to your sales rep about it. The other popular tools are Cariden MATE now owned by Cisco and OpNet now owned by Riverbed. Cariden was the easiest to use in my previous experience. All these are great until you see the price tag. If you're a huge telco or NSP and money is no object, go for it. It might be better for most smaller shops to just purchase some Junosphere time, as there is a virtualized WANDL VM that can be hooked up to your topology in Junosphere. -evt ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool
Get a demo of Packet Design Route Explorer as well. Www.packetdesign.com Thanks, - Randy Manning Systems Engineer Packet Design | 7801 N. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 230 | Austin, TX 78731 Office: +1.301.395.1772 | Fax: +1.512.865.6950 Visit our Website http://www.packetdesign.com/ | Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/packetdesign | Join us on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/packet-design On 12/24/14, 11:40 AM, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com wrote: Junosphere doesn't do that type of modeling and simulation but WANDL does. Juniper may be working on Junosphere/WANDL integration now that they own WANDL. They used to support Cariden MATE within Junosphere but stopped when Cisco bought Cariden. WANDL will certainly do what you want, I would talk to your sales rep about it. The other popular tools are Cariden MATE now owned by Cisco and OpNet now owned by Riverbed. Cariden was the easiest to use in my previous experience. Phil -Original Message- From: jjsyed--- via juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: ?12/?23/?2014 7:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool Hello, can somebody give me feedback on the two tool I am thinking about using and cannot decide which one to use. I think the answer depends on what needs to be done? I am planning to decommission some services from my backbone and like to move over those existing ckt to pt to pt link. I am pretty sure there will be change in traffic pattern , flows etc, so I need to know which tool can help me or give me good picture of the network in present and future state. I am looking at wandl or Junosphere. thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] experience with modeling tool
Hello, can somebody give me feedback on the two tool I am thinking about using and cannot decide which one to use. I think the answer depends on what needs to be done? I am planning to decommission some services from my backbone and like to move over those existing ckt to pt to pt link. I am pretty sure there will be change in traffic pattern , flows etc, so I need to know which tool can help me or give me good picture of the network in present and future state. I am looking at wandl or Junosphere. thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
