Re: [j-nsp] SRX doing IPv6 on DSL
(Thunderbird crashed taking away my first response) Skeeve's post is spurred by a post of mine to Ausnog earlier today looking for a new reliable home ADSL CPE. In fact although I can now set family inet6 on a PPPoE interface, I can't do something similar to family inet negotiate-address which makes it useless for consumer circuits, even if I could avoid the need for DHCP-PD (previously my ISP required DHCP-PD before they'd route a static block, this may have changed). The fact that I can't even do SLAAC on an Ethernet port means it's also not usable if I was on FTTH. On 10/12/12 23:26, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know is the SRX110 is capable of doing DHCP-PD or 6RD yet? If not, does anyone know of a X release or when it may hit mainline? IPv6 is starting to get popular with engineers and at the moment all they seem to be able to use are Cisco 877/887 and ISR's with DSL WIC cards. Surely Juniper has some plans afoot? ...Skeeve * * *Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellego ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Brocade - Cloud - Check out our Juniper promotion website! eintellego.mx Free Apple products during this promotion!!! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Julien Goodwin Studio442 Blue Sky Solutioneering signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] SRX doing IPv6 on DSL
SRX can't do it, yet. http://forums.juniper.net/t5/SRX-Services-Gateway/Branch-SRX-as-a-DHCPv6-prefix-delegation-client/m-p/158172#M20307 On Tuesday 11 December 2012 00:17:44 Julien Goodwin wrote: (Thunderbird crashed taking away my first response) Skeeve's post is spurred by a post of mine to Ausnog earlier today looking for a new reliable home ADSL CPE. In fact although I can now set family inet6 on a PPPoE interface, I can't do something similar to family inet negotiate-address which makes it useless for consumer circuits, even if I could avoid the need for DHCP-PD (previously my ISP required DHCP-PD before they'd route a static block, this may have changed). The fact that I can't even do SLAAC on an Ethernet port means it's also not usable if I was on FTTH. On 10/12/12 23:26, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know is the SRX110 is capable of doing DHCP-PD or 6RD yet? If not, does anyone know of a X release or when it may hit mainline? IPv6 is starting to get popular with engineers and at the moment all they seem to be able to use are Cisco 877/887 and ISR's with DSL WIC cards. Surely Juniper has some plans afoot? ...Skeeve * * *Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellego ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Brocade - Cloud - Check out our Juniper promotion website! eintellego.mx Free Apple products during this promotion!!! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Mike Williams ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] SRX and IPv6
Martin,
I am running IPv6 Tunnelbroker from Huricane Electric on my SRX 210
10.3R1.9 no issues.
The IPv6 configuration is similar to IPv4 on your SRX.
Here is some examples off my SRX, hope it helps, more/better stuff out
on google.
--
#My Inside interface, dual-stack
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 192.168.0.1/24;
}
family inet6 {
address 2001:470:5:fff::1/64;
}
}
}
#IPv6 Tunnel interface to Huricane Electric
ip-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
tunnel {
source 98.1.2.4;
destination 209.1.2.4;
}
family inet6 {
address 2001:470:4:fff::2/64;
}
}
}
#IPv6 Default Route
routing-options {
rib inet6.0 {
static {
route ::/0 next-hop 2001:470:4:fff::1;
}
}
}
#For Zones, just add the interface under the security-zone section
like normal ipv4
#Also under security section, add in ipv6 forward, then reboot (check
out
http://blog.kramse.org/blojsom/blog/default/IPv6/Juniper-SRX210-Junos-10-2-flow-based-IPv6-forwarding?smm=y)
security {
zones {
security-zone trust {
tcp-rst;
address-book {
}
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0.0 {
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
ssh;
ping;
}
}
}
}
}
forwarding-options {
family {
inet6 {
mode packet-based;
}
}
}
--Matt
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:38 PM, martin papik pa...@utia.cas.cz wrote:
Hi,
We have SRX device.
I need to configure 3 zones (Trust, Untrust, DMZ) and each zone will have
one interface in inet6.
The DMZ is for DNS IPv6 server and Untrust for Inet and Trust for LAN (ipv6
also).
And as second I will need maybe trunk interface for inet6.
Please if you have any trivial example ??? of this conf send it.
Thanks
Martin
IT staff
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
