Hi,
You should really do
show route forwarding-table destination 69.165.166.240/28 detail|extensive
show route only shows the RPD's (routing process) view of the route.
Load balancing policy is applied when the routes are installed in the
kernel forwarding-table (same as PFE forwarding-table). Only there you
can see the 2 next-hops for the route.
The other problem of router using only one agg ethernet link while
forwarding traffic is related to load balance hash calculation which in
turn depends on the traffic type. If source/destination pairs are not
varying much, router may not yield good hash values.
Another thing to add is, if you are using multiple agg ethernet links
for load balancing, you might want to try this knob.
set forwarding-options load-balance indexed-next-hop
Depending upon the release this knob may or may not be hidden. This knob
produces better hashing results for load balancing over multiple agg
ethernet links.
Thanks,
Nilesh.
Joe Abley wrote:
A router of my acquaintance in Toronto has:
jab...@agg01.tor-switch show version | grep Base
JUNOS Base OS boot [8.5R4.3]
JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [8.5R4.3]
jab...@agg01.tor-switch
and also
routing-options {
static {
route 69.165.166.240/28 next-hop [ 69.165.167.156
69.165.167.20 ];
}
forwarding-table {
export load-balancing-policy;
}
}
policy-options {
policy-statement load-balancing-policy {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
}
}
The idea is to do some crude load-sharing of outbound traffic from
this router towards 69.165.166.240/28. Both 69.165.167.156
69.165.167.20 are reachable via interface/connected routes.
The router only ever seems to select one next-hop. Interface counters
elsewhere confirm that only one path is being used for traffic towards
the customer.
jab...@agg01.tor-switch show route 69.165.166.240/28 detail
inet.0: 326067 destinations, 886829 routes (325604 active, 70
holddown, 453765 hidden)
69.165.166.240/28 (1 entry, 1 announced)
*Static Preference: 5
Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 262255
Next-hop reference count: 3
Next hop: 69.165.167.20 via ae0.146
Next hop: 69.165.167.156 via ae0.115, selected
State: Active Int Ext
Local AS: 5645
Age: 4d 18:54:21
Task: RT
Announcement bits (4): 0-KRT 2-RT 5-BGP RT Background
6-Resolve tree 1
AS path: I
AS path: Recorded
jab...@agg01.tor-switch
jab...@agg01.tor-switch show route 69.165.167.20 detail
inet.0: 326088 destinations, 886857 routes (325655 active, 47
holddown, 453807 hidden)
69.165.167.16/29 (1 entry, 1 announced)
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Next-hop reference count: 2
Next hop: via ae0.146, selected
State: Active Int
Local AS: 5645
Age: 4d 19:09:55
Task: IF
Announcement bits (3): 2-RT 5-BGP RT Background 6-
Resolve tree 1
AS path: I
AS path: Recorded
jab...@agg01.tor-switch show route 69.165.167.156 detail
inet.0: 326096 destinations, 886861 routes (325655 active, 55
holddown, 453813 hidden)
69.165.167.152/29 (1 entry, 1 announced)
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Next-hop reference count: 2
Next hop: via ae0.115, selected
State: Active Int
Local AS: 5645
Age: 4d 19:06:28
Task: IF
Announcement bits (3): 2-RT 5-BGP RT Background 6-
Resolve tree 1
AS path: I
AS path: Recorded
jab...@agg01.tor-switch
What am I missing?
Joe
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
