Re: [kaffe] Problem with Jetty
Hi Helmer, Helmer Krämer wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:06:32 -0800 Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, : == Syed Mudasir ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: :i am try to set up jetty web server : when i run the following command i get the following : error : --- Error --- : kaffe -jar start.jar etc/demo.xml Which version of kaffe are you using? Here on my machine, Jetty-4.2.12 works fine with the CVS version of kaffe whose ChangeLog head is: 2003-10-22 Ito Kazumitsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] There has been some regression with the latest CVS (x86), Jetty 4.2.9 starts for me, but it can't find the default webpage: http://localhost:8825/jetty/index.html I've got this in the logs: 09:00:53.872 WARN!! Error 404 while serving error page for 404 It worked before - if nobody else gets to it, I'll try to chase it down in the next few days... the problem is that classpath's gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Connection doesn't override getPermission. Thanks for the hint. I've checked in a fix to the CVS. cheers, dalibor topic ___ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
[kaffe] distribution/license question
Can I redistribute Kaffe as part of a commercial app as does Sun allowing integration with your application w/o requiring a separate installation? But more so than Sun, do I have to include the whole distro? I'm looking to include only a subset (personal java equivalent) thanks dario ___ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
Re: [kaffe] [RFC] Upcoming Apache Software Foundation License changes
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:39:03 +0100 Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, excuse me for cross-posting the following e-mail to so many diverse projects. As I'm subscribed to all those projects mailing lists, I was surprised to notice a lack of discussion on the effect of the upcoming Apache Software Foundation (ASF) license changes [1] on them. Naughty, naughty. Very bad netiquette. I almost didn't moderate that email through, since it was held by mailman for the excessive amount of cross-posting. Instead of cross-posting to so many lists, I'd recommend sending individual emails to the various lists, and refer the conversation to some other list. I see you sort of do that in the email, encouraging people to join the Apache license mailing list. I encourage followups to go to the Apache list, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's info on how to describe: http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/ I'm all in favour of trying to make all the licenses play more nicely together. However, as we're in the situation where we can't really change our license, I'd prefer the discussion be held there, rather than here. Cheers, - Jim ___ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
[kaffe] [RFC] Upcoming Apache Software Foundation License changes
Hi all, excuse me for cross-posting the following e-mail to so many diverse projects. As I'm subscribed to all those projects mailing lists, I was surprised to notice a lack of discussion on the effect of the upcoming Apache Software Foundation (ASF) license changes [1] on them. Most of you know ASF for their great work on free java software. ASF is increasingly becoming the testbed, and reference implementation provider for Java APIs, which end up in the implementations provided by Sun. The ASF is trying to modify its licenses to ensure GPL compatibility on one hand, and satisfy JSPA (Java Specification Participation Agreement) [2] requirements on the other hand, among other goals. A new set of licenses replaces the single Apache license by 3 separate licenses, that inted to cover general Apache projects [3], reference implementation of a JSR (Java Specification Request) [4], and testing compatibility kits (TCKs) of a JSR [5]. As many of you are involved in projects that provide free implementations of parts of the runtime environment for Java programs, it would be nice if you could take some time to comment on the proposed licenses to the Apache license discussion mailing list. Instructions how to join that mailing list are povided on [1], the archives are on [6]. The effect of the upcoming ASF license change *could* be beneficial to the free software java world and the ASF wants to achieve that. The availability of RIs and TCKs under a liberal license seems particularly attractive to free software Java projects. You can help fixing problems with the next apache licenses if you take some time to comment on them. If you intend to so so, make sure to submit your comment today. Yes, today is the last day, therefore you get this cross-posted e-mail, and so on. Anyway, comment on what you percieve as problematic, and your grandgrandchildren may thank you ;) For another take on this issue, please take a look at Mark Wielaard's (GNU Classpath maintainer) reply [7] to an earlier version of this RFC sent to the debian-java mailing list, who asks developers to take a look at the RI and TCK licenses, as the ASF hasn't received many comments on those. thanks, dalibor topic [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/ [2] http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA.pdf [3] http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/LICENSE-2.0.txt [4] http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/ri-license.txt [5] http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/tck-license.txt [6] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]by=thread [7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2003/debian-java-200311/msg00102.html ___ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
