BUG (small) in java.util.Vector

2000-01-14 Thread jan grant 


Since this class now implements java.util.List, it's worth pointing out
that
java.util.Vector doesn't supply an implementation for add (although it
has the
functionally identical addElement)

It's a trivial fix; what's the state-of-play regarding the 1.2-ness of
Kaffe's
classes?

jan
-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, I have a very good idea of how fast my keys are moving.

Re: BUG (small) in java.util.Vector

2000-01-14 Thread Archie Cobbs 


jan grant writes:
 Since this class now implements java.util.List, it's worth pointing out
 that
 java.util.Vector doesn't supply an implementation for add (although it
 has the
 functionally identical addElement)

It's implemented in the superclass, AbstractList. Is there a functional
reason we should override it (versus just to do the same as JDK does)?

 It's a trivial fix; what's the state-of-play regarding the 1.2-ness of
 Kaffe's classes?

We try to be 1.2 compliant.. it's mostly true but not completely true.

-Archie

___
Archie Cobbs   *   Whistle Communications, Inc.  *   http://www.whistle.com