Re: Talk on Kallithea at OSCON
On 19 June 2015 at 07:09, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > On 06/04/2015 03:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: >> >> I am writing to let you all know that my talk on Kallithea was accepted >> at OSCON: >> http://www.oscon.com/open-source-2015/public/schedule/detail/42015 >> >> Some of you saw an earlier version of this talk at FOSDEM earlier this >> year. As you may recall, at the end, I usually have at least one slide >> explaining the current state of Kallithea. Is there anything specific >> you'd like me to include? The talk is in late July. > > > I guess this talk is so much in your department that we don't have much to > say, other than "cool" ;-) > > I don't think there has been any "big" news in the Kallithea world. The > community is growing and many of us are using it in production so we like to > keep it stable and scratch our biggest itches. Getting the help from the pytest folks on the test suite improvements/migration was hopefully useful :) No progress on the forge.python.org front at this point - Donald Stufft has been focusing on the next generation of pypi.python.org, and I've been focused on Python 3.5 and Fedora, so whether that forward motion will be Phabricator based or Kallithea based is still an open question. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
Re: Talk on Kallithea at OSCON
On June 18, 2015 11:09:48 PM CEST, Mads Kiilerich wrote: >On 06/04/2015 03:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: >> I am writing to let you all know that my talk on Kallithea was >accepted >> at OSCON: >> >http://www.oscon.com/open-source-2015/public/schedule/detail/42015 >> >> Some of you saw an earlier version of this talk at FOSDEM earlier >this >> year. As you may recall, at the end, I usually have at least one >slide >> explaining the current state of Kallithea. Is there anything >specific >> you'd like me to include? The talk is in late July. > >I guess this talk is so much in your department that we don't have much > >to say, other than "cool" ;-) > >I don't think there has been any "big" news in the Kallithea world. The > >community is growing and many of us are using it in production so we >like to keep it stable and scratch our biggest itches. Are there any numbers about the size of the community? Maybe based on number of downloads/clones? ___ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
Re: Talk on Kallithea at OSCON
On 06/04/2015 03:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: I am writing to let you all know that my talk on Kallithea was accepted at OSCON: http://www.oscon.com/open-source-2015/public/schedule/detail/42015 Some of you saw an earlier version of this talk at FOSDEM earlier this year. As you may recall, at the end, I usually have at least one slide explaining the current state of Kallithea. Is there anything specific you'd like me to include? The talk is in late July. I guess this talk is so much in your department that we don't have much to say, other than "cool" ;-) I don't think there has been any "big" news in the Kallithea world. The community is growing and many of us are using it in production so we like to keep it stable and scratch our biggest itches. The biggest "thing" might be what happened elsewhere, with gitorious. https://about.gitlab.com/2015/05/20/gitlab-gitorious-free-software/ can perhaps inspire or ignite a discussion. We saw a number of (presumably) gitorious refugees asking us to change the license to AGPL. None of them seemed to be interested in contributing, so I really don't see why they should care which open source license their software were released under, as long as they had the freedom to choose anything from running their own instance to buying access to an instance hosted by someone else. Also, I find it "interesting" that I and other contributors probably not would have been able to use Kallithea in our $dayjob if it had been under AGPL but are happy with the GPL license. The relevance of AGPL might however be something we should discuss face to face more than a topic that is suitable for this talk ;-) /Mads ___ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
