[kbuild] Re: [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
On 5/31/2020 5:44 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something? It doesn't take time from me. You can ignore the Reported-by tags for new devel work, no one will be offended. There is a way to disable it but I forget how. It should probably be added to the FAQ. https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service Hi all, We have a FAQ for this: https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki/LKP-FAQ Best Regards, Rong Chen ___ kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org
[kbuild] Re: [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get > picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I > still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of > waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something? It doesn't take time from me. You can ignore the Reported-by tags for new devel work, no one will be offended. There is a way to disable it but I forget how. It should probably be added to the FAQ. https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service regards, dan carpenter ___ kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org