[kbuild] Re: [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.

2020-05-31 Thread Chen, Rong A




On 5/31/2020 5:44 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:

I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get
picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I
still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of
waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something?

It doesn't take time from me.  You can ignore the Reported-by tags for
new devel work, no one will be offended.

There is a way to disable it but I forget how.  It should probably be
added to the FAQ.  https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service


Hi all,

We have a FAQ for this: https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki/LKP-FAQ

Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org


[kbuild] Re: [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.

2020-05-30 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get
> picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I
> still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of
> waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something?

It doesn't take time from me.  You can ignore the Reported-by tags for
new devel work, no one will be offended.

There is a way to disable it but I forget how.  It should probably be
added to the FAQ.  https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service

regards,
dan carpenter
___
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org