Re: [kbuild-devel] [git pull] x86 fixes
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * David Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Monday 08 September 2008 17:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > Does this patch fix that for you? > > > > > > > Yes, thanks. > > it fixes build errors in my test setup too. Sam, i've applied Peter's fix (see the commit below) - do you have any objections to us carrying this in x86/urgent? It's needed for the gcc fix/workaround. Ingo ---> >From 095fbc7296ccfe41688e8ef136587b23f0e8c123 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:43:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] kbuild: fix cc-option and cc-option-yn David Sanders wrote: > I'm getting this error: > as: unrecognized option `-mtune=generic32' > I have binutils 2.17. Use -c instead of -S in cc-option and cc-option-yn, so we can probe options related to the assembler. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: kbuild devel Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- scripts/Kbuild.include |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/Kbuild.include b/scripts/Kbuild.include index d64e6ba..982dcae 100644 --- a/scripts/Kbuild.include +++ b/scripts/Kbuild.include @@ -105,12 +105,12 @@ as-instr = $(call try-run,\ # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586) cc-option = $(call try-run,\ - $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(1) -S -xc /dev/null -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2)) + $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(1) -c -xc /dev/null -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2)) # cc-option-yn # Usage: flag := $(call cc-option-yn,-march=winchip-c6) cc-option-yn = $(call try-run,\ - $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(1) -S -xc /dev/null -o "$$TMP",y,n) + $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(1) -c -xc /dev/null -o "$$TMP",y,n) # cc-option-align # Prefix align with either -falign or -malign - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
Re: [kbuild-devel] [git pull] x86 fixes
* David Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 08 September 2008 17:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Does this patch fix that for you? > > > > Yes, thanks. it fixes build errors in my test setup too. Ingo - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
Re: [kbuild-devel] [RFC] kbuild - introduce vdir to make life easier for x86_64
* Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 21:11 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > One of the complaints raised about the current x86_64 Makfiles are > > the ugliness needed to reuse code from i386. Andi asked me if we > > could do something in kbuild to make this less ugly and below are > > the hack I could come up with. > > while in general this is definitely a nice change, it does not really > solve the real problem of code scattered across two architectures. The > Makefile polishing is the least thing we care about. > > Thanks, i'd like to add it here that Makefile polishing is important - it's just that in the context of arch/*x86* the Makefile impact of the current cross-arch code sharing practice is one of the smaller problems and the Makefiles get cleaned up via the arch/x86 merge anyway. Ingo - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
[kbuild-devel] UML & make -j problem
one problem the UML build has in 2.6 is that 'make -j' does not work after a 'make clean'. The problem is the building of two binaries in arch/um/util/, which needs the kbuild infrastructure but which tools are also used for the 'prepare' stage. what would be the cleanest solution? Ingo --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
