Re: [kde] KDE 4.7 System Requirements

2012-01-09 Thread James Tyrer

On 01/07/2012 10:28 AM, Martin (KDE) wrote:

Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2012, 16:35:39 schrieb _:

Hi Everybody,

I'm considering installing the KDE 4.7.4 version on my FreeBSD 8.2 system,
and
I'd like to ask the community about the system requirements to make it run:

The base information for my system looks like this:

Intel P4 1.8 Ghz CPU
512 MB of RAM
Intel Onboard Graphics Chip

It will depend on which Intel chip you have.  The early ones suck while 
the current ones are OK.  It also matters if your motherboard supports 
interleaved memory (you need 4 memory cards for it to work) which will 
minimize the contention for memory between the processor and the GPU in 
North Bridge chip.



Can anybody on this list give me any pointers as to the performance of KDE
under
the above hardware setup?


Get more RAM. :-D


Moreover, how much diskspace will KDE take?



My installation used 882.4 MiB.


I had it running with a similar hardware
- 1.8 GHz Celeron
- onboard AMD x200 Graphic
- 512MB Ram (but later 1GB ram)

It was incredible slow (compared to my core i3) but it was usable. I think the
core problem may be ram. IF you can increase the ram up to 1GB it will be much
better.

Yes, the amount of RAM is the issue.  Probably it isn't anything to do 
with KDE, but it will run quite slowly if it is using virtual memory. 
If you can afford 4 GBytes, that is what I recommend.  Having more RAM 
appears to be more important than a faster processor.



More than a year ago my main computer was a P4 2.4Ghz wit 2GB of ram and it
was quite good.



--
James Tyrer

Linux (mostly) From Scratch
___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] [Okular-devel] [Bug 267350] filling out a PDF form saves data to some file i ~/.kde/share/apps/okular/docdata/

2012-01-09 Thread Dan Armbrust
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM,  jordon...@gmail.com wrote:
 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350

--- Comment #1 from Jackson Peacock pickled kde pepperedpeacock org  
2011-04-04 03:11:36 ---
I just noticed the same issue. I had stored some filled out forms on an
encrypted drive. I ran into a bug where the fields I entered didn't weren't
being displayed after being saved (not even an empty field). I figured the file
had been corrupted so I copied the original blank form over the filled out one.
When I opened it all the information I had entered into the form was there
despite the file having been overwritten. After looking around I found it had
been written to .kde/share/apps/okular/docdata - on an unencrypted drive. This
was quite startling to me and not what I expected.

I can understand if there are limitations to the PDF format that prevent you
from storing the data in the PDF file itself, however you should at least
inform the user of where the data is being stored before writing it.
Preferably, it should be stored in the same directory as the PDF as well.

--- Comment #2 from Jackson Peacock pickled kde pepperedpeacock org  
2011-04-10 20:04:21 ---
Another limitation of doing it this way is that it appears impossible to have
multiple copies of the same form filled out differently, even if saved in
different directories. For example, I filled out my tax forms, and then created
a new directory with the copied blank forms to do my girlfriend's taxes.
However, when I opened them they had my value stored in them.

The workaround was to rename the forms and then edit them, but it would match
user expectations better if each copy of the form had it's own set of values.

Finally, I do think the priority on this bug should be higher as it relates to
user privacy/security.
 --- Comment #3 from  jordonwii gmail com  2012-01-05 05:26:15 ---
 Agree with #2. I know the devs are aware of this because there are other 
 issues
 regarding the opening files and having the form remain being filled out
 (intentional feature). However, unsure if they are aware of the security
 implications of this. Developers have any comment?


I, and several others have pointed this out to the developers of
okular nearly 2 years ago.

They are blind, naive, and dare I say foolish.  They call this a
feature and refuse to acknowledge that it creates security holes all
over the place.  They have shown no desire to even take the report
seriously.

http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/2010-February/006386.html

Meanwhile, anyone that has ever used okular to fill out a form with
sensitive information has had that information dumped, in clear text,
onto whatever computer they happened to be using.  Without their
knowledge, or permission.

KDE shouldn't even include this program until they fix this.

It's a bad, bad, bad design.  Shame on the okular developers for
continuing to ignore the problem.
___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] Workspaces not working

2012-01-09 Thread heathmatlock
Solution: remove the activity and create another one with the template
search and launch. I thought I had done this, but I guess not.
Problem solved.

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, heathmatlock heathmatl...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm trying to figure out why search and launch workspace isn't showing
 me the notebook interface. Here's some video:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD0yofMTJOo

 --
 Heath Matlock
 +1 256 274 4225



-- 
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.