[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #10 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- @Lrnt, This problem still reproducible with the new digiKam 8.2.0 pre-release Windows installer available at usual place: https://files.kde.org/digikam/ This new bundle is based on last Qt framework 5.15.11 and KDE framework 5.110. Thanks in advance Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #9 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- @Lrnt digiKam 8.0.0 is out. This entry still valid with this release ? Best regards Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 MarcP changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #8 from Lrnt --- Hello Gilles both disks are NTFS disks. For the sidecar I do not know. Actually the command ls -al, isn't this a unix command? I am on W10. But I would say no, as the files come from Picasa3 where I used the option "write faces to xmp". So the data is in the photo itself. Am I wrong? Currently I still keep using both SW, and Picasa3 because it is so much quicker than Digikam for the tag and face features search that I use a lot. Digikam is great too and I will move there slowly and especially when the smaller faces are detected like it will be as Maik explained. Hope this helps. Kind regards Laurent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- Which kind of file systems do you use on SDD and HDD. It's the same ? Do you have any extra sidecar file stored in album from on disk and not from the other one ? Check with 'ls -al' on both devices... Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #6 from Lrnt --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #5) > No images are skipped when the drive is slow. > > Maik thank you Maik. Still not understanding why reading the same directory from the HDD it skips faces and from the SDD it does not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #5 from Maik Qualmann --- No images are skipped when the drive is slow. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #4 from Lrnt --- Hi Maik, I tried to move one test directory to a sdd hd internal. Of course it went about 2-3 times faster than the normal hdd. But also all the faces were imported properly. Could it be that Digikam just skips reading the metadata of certain files or that the DB SQlite just times out and skips the entries? Best regards Laurent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #3 from Lrnt --- Hi Maik, I guess using a VM and the real W10 might not be the same. Still no clue why it did not import the picasa3 faces? thanks Laurent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #2 from Lrnt --- Hello Maik, I am not sure to understand the relation between the antivirus and Digikam but I use Norton as an Antivirus and Zonealarm as firewal. Best eregards Laurent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann --- A test here when importing a few thousand images under my Windows 10 VM in various ways shows no problems. All metadata and face rectangles were correctly scanned by digiKam. I also suspect an external cause such as anti virus programs that block digiKam in the scanning process. Which anti virus program do you use? Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 428187] first user experience scares (non technical) people away and picasa3 faces imported but not as faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428187 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metzping...@gmail.com Component|Albums-Engine |Database-Scan Platform|Other |Microsoft Windows OS|Other |Microsoft Windows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
