[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Giboudeaux--- Reminder: if we add an option and menu entry each time a user thinks his must-have functionality deserves one, KMail would have a few more buttons bars and countless options in the menu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 --- Comment #11 from Kamil Dudka--- It is not important where I work. I am a user of kmail (call me enduser if you like). I do not package kmail for any distribution if that is your concern. I have been using kmail since 2005. Now I have serious doubts about the future of kmail. The problem is that your decisions about removing "not useful" features are not backed up by any facts (like user survey's results). You keep removing features that are considered useful by many kmail's users, which I think is not beneficial for this community project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Till Schäferchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #10 from Till Schäfer --- I am reopening this bug for the following reasons: 1. Your answer is a clear validation of KDEs Community Code of Conduct [1]: - The answer is not respectful. Quote: "stop to cry" is a clear assault on somebody else who is committed to the project. The code of conduct sais: "We do not tolerate personal attacks"! - Your answer is not considerate. It is no problem to disagree and I would accept a decision you make as a package maintainer. However, having multiple voices, from major open source contributors, that have politely pointed out issues with your position should not be put down without at least a few word acknowledging the others issues and explaining why you still think you position is right. - I also think, even as a maintainer one should not act as a dictator. The code of conduct says: "We value tangible results over having the last word in a discussion." 2. This bug was not fixed. If you do not want to fix the issue, this would go in the category WONTFIX and should be marked as such. [1] https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Laurent Montelchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Laurent Montel --- (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #8) > Laurent, could you please stop removing or hiding kmail's features which you > think are not useful or important? > > Those features were originally implemented for a reason and kmail's users > have been successfully using them for quite some time. If you keep the > current pace of downgrading user experience with each subsequent release of > kmail, you are going loose existing users of kmail for no real benefit. > > You should really focus on fixing existing bugs instead of removing existing > stable features that nobody complains about. Just a question: Are you the kmail maintainer ? no I don't think. I am. So if I think that it's better to reduce menu or hide not useful feature for enduser it's my choice. You work on redhat so make your work as packager and stop to cry. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Kamil Dudkachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||kdu...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Kamil Dudka --- Laurent, could you please stop removing or hiding kmail's features which you think are not useful or important? Those features were originally implemented for a reason and kmail's users have been successfully using them for quite some time. If you keep the current pace of downgrading user experience with each subsequent release of kmail, you are going loose existing users of kmail for no real benefit. You should really focus on fixing existing bugs instead of removing existing stable features that nobody complains about. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Christoph Feckchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||kdeb...@customcdrom.de --- Comment #7 from Christoph Feck --- *** Bug 388080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 --- Comment #6 from Laurent Montel--- (In reply to Till Schäfer from comment #5) > I use it as an end user, e.g. to verify that a newsletter format of my > wordpress instance is correct. For sure you are the first people which searched it. > > I also think, that "toolbar" \subseteq "menu" is a typical pattern and > therefore is the expectation of users. Thus, having items randomly appearing > only for the on or the other place will only create more confusion. > > I also do not think that this menu item is very confusing for other users. > Alternatively it may be possible to hide advanced features and only show > them if you choose the advanced mode? I.e. similar to the vlc approach. An advanced mode no it will be very hard to test 2 modes. But I can create a plugin (disable by default) which can add action in menu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 --- Comment #5 from Till Schäfer--- I use it as an end user, e.g. to verify that a newsletter format of my wordpress instance is correct. I also think, that "toolbar" \subseteq "menu" is a typical pattern and therefore is the expectation of users. Thus, having items randomly appearing only for the on or the other place will only create more confusion. I also do not think that this menu item is very confusing for other users. Alternatively it may be possible to hide advanced features and only show them if you choose the advanced mode? I.e. similar to the vlc approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 --- Comment #4 from Laurent Montel--- For me it's not a end user feature. It's for power user feature. If we want to clean up menu we don't need to add more extra menu entry for power user. There is a shortcut for it, and we can add it from toolbar if we want. Otherwise it's not necessary to try to simplify kmail if we keep some power user feature in menu, for sure I don't use by default this feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Daniel Vrátilchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||dvra...@kde.org --- Comment #3 from Daniel Vrátil --- I don't think that's acceptable - we can't just have some options "hidden" in the toolbar, especially when they are not enabled by default and not accessible from the menu at all. I had to actually look into the source code to find where the option is, that's simply not something we can expect our users to do... IMO toolbars should be like "favorites". They should contain actions from menus that are very often used by users so that they can just click on the button in the toolbar instead of having to open the menu to get to those actions, but toolbars should *never* hide additional actions that are not accessible from the menu. There's just *NO WAY* users will ever find those options. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Laurent Montelchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||mon...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Laurent Montel --- As wrote in comment 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Colin J Thomsonchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||colin.thom...@g6avk.co.uk --- Comment #1 from Colin J Thomson --- Looks like it has been moved now, a shortcut is available in the Toolbar. FYI heres the commit: https://cgit.kde.org/kmail.git/commit/?id=24c46184c27407a9224b11697c094d6a71e2cf7c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Till Schäferchanged: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |Gentoo Packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Till Schäferchanged: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |5.7.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 387931] KMail 5.7.0 is missing the message structure option
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387931 Till Schäferchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|KMail 5.7.0 is missing the |KMail 5.7.0 is missing the |Message Structure Option|message structure option -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.