[ksysguard] [Bug 253742] ksysguardd: inefficient read loop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253742 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Feck --- ksysguardd was written explicitely with minimal dependencies (glibc only) in mind, so that it can be installed on any system to be remotely monitored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[ksysguard] [Bug 253742] ksysguardd: inefficient read loop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253742 Jiri Palecek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpale...@web.de --- Comment #4 from Jiri Palecek --- Speaking about inefficiency in ksysguardd, is there an actual reason why it doesn't use Qt's normal means for IO, container implementations etc. and instead uses some home brew structures and algos with questionable efficiency and interfaces? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[ksysguard] [Bug 253742] ksysguardd: inefficient read loop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253742 --- Comment #3 from Ortwin Glück --- Still the same in ksysguard-5.13.5. A simple strace on the process immediately shows the series of single-byte read() syscalls. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[ksysguard] [Bug 253742] ksysguardd: inefficient read loop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253742 Andrew Crouthamel changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED --- Comment #2 from Andrew Crouthamel --- Dear Bug Submitter, This is a reminder that this bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version? This bug will be moved back to REPORTED Status for manual review later, which may take a while. If you are able to, please lend us a hand. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[ksysguard] [Bug 253742] ksysguardd: inefficient read loop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253742 Andrew Crouthamel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO --- Comment #1 from Andrew Crouthamel --- Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version? I am setting the status to NEEDSINFO pending your response, please change the Status back to REPORTED when you respond. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
